Author Topic: Ki84 (Read 1670 times)

United · « **Reply #30 on:** August 06, 2004, 05:59:21 PM »

Cant be a B-29, they didnt have any Boulton Paul turrets.

Pongo · « **Reply #31 on:** August 06, 2004, 06:00:36 PM »

B17Skull12 · « **Reply #32 on:** August 06, 2004, 06:13:20 PM »

halifax.

Pongo · « **Reply #33 on:** August 06, 2004, 06:17:39 PM »

Quote

Originally posted by United
Control cables as well, very nice indeed.

Are you refering to the radio wires or did I miss something?

Ozark · « **Reply #34 on:** August 06, 2004, 06:28:50 PM »

Holy Cow NATEDOG!!

That is SWEET!! Waited a long time to fly my old ride in Aces High.

Thank you!!

United · « **Reply #35 on:** August 06, 2004, 06:34:41 PM »

Quote

Originally posted by Pongo
Are you refering to the radio wires or did I miss something?

Yes, I misinterpreted them and called them control cables because I couldnt think of the right name for them...

2bighorn · « **Reply #36 on:** August 06, 2004, 06:35:30 PM »

Quote

Originally posted by B17Skull12
halifax.

Liberators had them too, my bet is on b-24

B17Skull12 · « **Reply #37 on:** August 06, 2004, 06:37:58 PM »

to many american planes as it is. i really wanna see a german bomber.

BlueJ1 · « **Reply #38 on:** August 06, 2004, 06:41:39 PM »

mmmmm he111

ra · « **Reply #39 on:** August 06, 2004, 07:37:21 PM »

Quote

Coupled, I can see the Ki-84 being in the top 4 for quite some time.

I'd guess the Ki-84 will be in the top 4 for 1 tour. It seems like a C.205 with better range and a better 6 view. It's good compared to the A6M5 and the Ki-61, but it's not good enough to become a dweeb plane.

ra

Karnak · « **Reply #40 on:** August 06, 2004, 07:42:37 PM »

Quote

Originally posted by ra
I'd guess the Ki-84 will be in the top 4 for 1 tour. It seems like a C.205 with better range and a better 6 view. It's good compared to the A6M5 and the Ki-61, but it's not good enough to become a dweeb plane.

ra

I think it would slaughter C.205s if it is modeled at all like I think it will be. Much faster on the deck than the C.205 and turns better.

nopoop · « **Reply #41 on:** August 06, 2004, 07:51:13 PM »

BEEEEEUTIFUL SKIN !!!

DREDIOCK · « **Reply #42 on:** August 06, 2004, 08:27:26 PM »

A while back on the Beta board I made a suggestion to the skinners to make skins that were.. less then perfect looking.
Skins that showed the wear and tear of war.

THIS is what I was talking about.
Dont get me wrong. You guys that can do skinning do some really rightous work. I only wish I was able to do that
The only downside is theysometimes look too good. That is too perfect

WONDERFUL job Nate.
You got what I ment when I said
"the perfection is in the imperfection"

DREDIOCK · « **Reply #43 on:** August 06, 2004, 08:34:00 PM »

Quote

Originally posted by JB73
from what i have read on this board:

supposed to make la7 look like sissy plane.

BTW <~~> HTC crew TY for the shots, keep up the great work!!!!!~~

Heh,
I've flown the La7.
La7 is already a sissy plane
Too easy.
Thats why I dont fly it much

And I agree. La7 should be perked.
If not then the F4u-1c should be unperked

SirLoin · « **Reply #44 on:** August 06, 2004, 08:53:15 PM »

So the Ki-84 was that flying PT boat HiTech was shootin everyone down in?..lol!:D