« previous next »
Pages: [1] 2 3 4 5   Go Down

Author Topic: for it or against it? (balancing)  (Read 1448 times)

Offline tapakeg

  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 599
for it or against it? (balancing)
« on: August 13, 2004, 11:45:12 PM »
Ok, if you want to post or read opinions about the new balancing mode by HTC go to another thread.

SO........................... with one word reply's, are you FOR or AGAINST the new system.

me?

AGAINST

Tapakeg
Logged
You know that your landing gear is up and locked when it takes full power to taxi to the terminal

Offline SunKing

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3726
for it or against it? (balancing)
« Reply #1 on: August 13, 2004, 11:57:51 PM »
For



(change is good)
Logged

Offline FBRaptor

  • Copper Member
  • **
  • Posts: 269
      • http://www.freebirdshome.us
for it or against it? (balancing)
« Reply #2 on: August 13, 2004, 11:57:58 PM »
Too soon to tell.
Logged

Offline jdpete75

  • Copper Member
  • **
  • Posts: 115
for it or against it? (balancing)
« Reply #3 on: August 14, 2004, 12:06:00 AM »
against
Logged

Offline yb11

  • Copper Member
  • **
  • Posts: 118
for it or against it? (balancing)
« Reply #4 on: August 14, 2004, 12:36:30 AM »
for it    it has to be beter the gitin run over by the hord
Logged

Offline dragoon

  • Copper Member
  • **
  • Posts: 218
l
« Reply #5 on: August 14, 2004, 12:42:57 AM »
against
Logged

Offline B17Skull12

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3839
for it or against it? (balancing)
« Reply #6 on: August 14, 2004, 12:46:48 AM »
for.  tired of the  down to 5 bases, 200+ rooks spread out over a front of 2 sector's  and radar out, log.
Logged
II/JG3 DGS II

Offline 4510

  • Copper Member
  • **
  • Posts: 302
for it or against it? (balancing)
« Reply #7 on: August 14, 2004, 12:48:56 AM »
Against
Logged

Offline Xargos

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 4281
for it or against it? (balancing)
« Reply #8 on: August 14, 2004, 12:53:34 AM »
If the planes were perked instead of disabled it wouldn't be so bad.  But as it is now I'm against.
Logged
Jeffery R."Xargos" Ward

"At least I have chicken." 
Member DFC

Offline Hyrax81st

  • Copper Member
  • **
  • Posts: 280
for it or against it? (balancing)
« Reply #9 on: August 14, 2004, 01:13:44 AM »
Quote
Originally posted by Xargos
If the planes were perked instead of disabled it wouldn't be so bad.  But as it is now I'm against.



I agree that if a limiting factor is going to be introduced, it should be perking (something everyone already understands and can quickly adapt to) rather than restriction of the plane-set. But the old argument of why certain planes have never been perked will resurface as a result...
Logged

Offline dragoon

  • Copper Member
  • **
  • Posts: 218
against?
« Reply #10 on: August 14, 2004, 01:24:22 AM »
you are against it as of now right hyrax?
Logged

Offline Hyrax81st

  • Copper Member
  • **
  • Posts: 280
Re: against?
« Reply #11 on: August 14, 2004, 01:37:02 AM »
Quote
Originally posted by dragoon
you are against it as of now right hyrax?


Yes, against it as currently implemented. Plane set shouldn't be restricted in MA. That's what the CT (and ToD) would be for.
Logged

Offline B17Skull12

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3839
for it or against it? (balancing)
« Reply #12 on: August 14, 2004, 02:02:20 AM »
it has been shown perks aren't enough can't you see that?  most people have over 500 perks anyways so really whats the point of perks?
Logged
II/JG3 DGS II

Offline Xargos

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 4281
for it or against it? (balancing)
« Reply #13 on: August 14, 2004, 02:06:06 AM »
Most people, realy?  Not I.
Logged
Jeffery R."Xargos" Ward

"At least I have chicken." 
Member DFC

Offline anton

  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 456
      • http://n/a
for it or against it? (balancing)
« Reply #14 on: August 14, 2004, 02:10:02 AM »
For  (twenty) it
Logged
Pages: [1] 2 3 4 5   Go Up
« previous next »