for it or against it? (balancing)

[SunKing]

Originally posted by B17Skull12
it has been shown perks aren't enough can't you see that?  most people have over 500 perks anyways so really whats the point of perks?

I think after a month or so the perks would start to work. People would burn most of their PP bank off and Perks would work the way they were intended  eventually. Of course there are those who have 10k + perks , then again they are the community that can fly any plane and have success too. I would really like to see a slight perk cost on late war planes , but I'm dreaming.

[jdpete75]

B17 what about the C-Hog.  perked from 4 to 12 points and now they arent all that common

[jetb123]

I am not against it or like it. Because I havent played yet. All I want to know is what happens when a big mission ups. And half cant up?

[B17Skull12]

lets see.

F4U-1C   2246   905   1.32   0.53   2.48
now lets compare that with the spit9
Spitfire Mk IX   6697   6913   3.94   4.07   0.97
well hot damn 1/3 the use of the spit9.
2nd most used hog.  perks do nonthing.  if you dont understand the fact that people have huge bank rolls in perks and are to timid to fight.  that is why they have utterly failed to balance numbers.  Instead you just have more planes in the air with perks that are to scared to fight.

http://www.innomi.com/ahkillstats/totalstats.php

[tshred]

Against it. Rediculous idea. Life ain't fair, get over it.

ts

[Kev367th]

For it.
Eventually all countries will be affected by it at one time or another.
If HT was to perk LA7, P51 etc we would be getting exactly the same complaints.

[FBRaptor]

Originally posted by tshred
Against it. Rediculous idea. Life ain't fair, get over it.

ts

LOL, exactly tshred, Life aint fair....get over it and adapt :0)

[Hyrax81st]

Originally posted by Kev367th
For it.
Eventually all countries will be affected by it at one time or another.
If HT was to perk LA7, P51 etc we would be getting exactly the same complaints.

Not exactly... because the planes would still be available for a nominal cost - as opposed to now, where they are completely eliminated from the plane-set.

[Roscoroo]

against it ... just because of a number inbalance ... we should lose plane choices ... hell its bad enough when 262's cost 500 perks and every one else gets them for 49 . (us rooks didnt get that perk adv 2 yrs ago )


hell just bribe one or two prime time squads over to the knits or bish and the whining will stop ...( i wish)


A noble Rook never whined when the numbers were the other way .

[Kev367th]

Hyrax I would agree, but perking the Pony and La7 would result in the same complaints but for different reasons.
Kweassa had a post about perking planes, the majority of responses were negative.
HT can't win either way. Lets see how it pans out over a few weeks, like the 75% fuel and no night ( which I don't like ) people will adapt.
For people to say if I can't fly (insert model) plane I am cancelling or whatever is just ridiculous. Bit like cutting your nose off to spite your face. The good/great whatever pilots in this game will adapt to the new style.

[Xargos]

If it gets to the point were I can't fly a Bf109G-10 nor a G-2 I'm out of here.

[Hyrax81st]

Originally posted by Kev367th
For people to say if I can't fly (insert model) plane I am cancelling or whatever is just ridiculous. Bit like cutting your nose off to spite your face. The good/great whatever pilots in this game will adapt to the new style.

I agree that time will tell and there is no reason to quit the game in the first 48 hours after a patch like this.

[zabe]

For it



Zabe

[TBolt A-10]

Neutral.  But, I'd prefer to see planes disabled as a result of a successful bombing mission, not because of numbers.    

[tapakeg]

i like that idea T-bolt