« previous next »
Pages: 1 2 3 [4] 5   Go Down

Author Topic: for it or against it? (balancing)  (Read 1445 times)

Offline SFCHONDO

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1817
for it or against it? (balancing)
« Reply #45 on: August 14, 2004, 05:38:37 PM »
AGAINST!!!

Logged
        HONDO
DENVER BRONCOS    
   
  Retired from AH

Offline Overlag

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3888
for it or against it? (balancing)
« Reply #46 on: August 14, 2004, 05:40:32 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by FBRaptor
Too soon to tell.
Logged
Adam Webb - 71st (Eagle) Squadron RAF Wing B
This post has a Krusty rating of 37

Offline Bammer4

  • Zinc Member
  • *
  • Posts: 48
AGAINST1111
« Reply #47 on: August 14, 2004, 05:44:47 PM »
Open Letter to Hitech

I pay good money to play this game and to fly these planes. I just watched 32 Bishops log off in the last 30 minutes (I made 33) in frustration.   i HAVE HAD TWO MISSIONS DISRUPTED AT LAUNCH BECAUSE PLANES THAT WERE OK WHEN THE MISSION WAS ACCEPTED WERE NO LONGER ALLOWED AT MISSION LAUNCH!!  I refuse to pay you ANY MORE money if I cannot fly the planes.

LET ME MAKE IT ABSOLUTELY PERFECTLY CRYSTAL CLEAR.

I REFUSE TO PAY YOU ANY MORE MONEY UNTIL I CAN FLY THE PLANES AGAIN!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Logged

Offline phookat

  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 629
for it or against it? (balancing)
« Reply #48 on: August 14, 2004, 05:45:13 PM »
For.  I'm with DipStick.  The whines are great entertainment.
Logged

Offline rabbidrabbit

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3910
for it or against it? (balancing)
« Reply #49 on: August 14, 2004, 05:50:06 PM »
AGAINST

There are better ways to accomplish the same task.. this is just punishing people to an extreme for something  they can't control.
Logged

Offline Furious

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3243
for it or against it? (balancing)
« Reply #50 on: August 14, 2004, 05:51:25 PM »
I am thoroughly enjoying it.
Logged

Offline killnu

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3056
for it or against it? (balancing)
« Reply #51 on: August 14, 2004, 05:51:44 PM »
um bammer, nobody said you cant fly the planes, just to fly them you must switch countries, or even out the numbers, hence the term balancing.  oh well.  
~S~
Logged
Karma, it follows you every where you go...

++The Blue Knights++

Offline FBBone

  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 549
for it or against it? (balancing)
« Reply #52 on: August 14, 2004, 05:52:03 PM »
FOR
Logged

Offline Overlag

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3888
Re: AGAINST1111
« Reply #53 on: August 14, 2004, 05:57:33 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by Bammer4
Open Letter to Hitech

I pay good money to play this game and to fly these planes. I just watched 32 Bishops log off in the last 30 minutes (I made 33) in frustration.   i HAVE HAD TWO MISSIONS DISRUPTED AT LAUNCH BECAUSE PLANES THAT WERE OK WHEN THE MISSION WAS ACCEPTED WERE NO LONGER ALLOWED AT MISSION LAUNCH!!  I refuse to pay you ANY MORE money if I cannot fly the planes.

LET ME MAKE IT ABSOLUTELY PERFECTLY CRYSTAL CLEAR.

I REFUSE TO PAY YOU ANY MORE MONEY UNTIL I CAN FLY THE PLANES AGAIN!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!


you can fly the planes just not the p51D/La7 etc, big deal, theres loads of other planes

idiot:rolleyes:
Logged
Adam Webb - 71st (Eagle) Squadron RAF Wing B
This post has a Krusty rating of 37

Offline RDSaustinTX

  • Copper Member
  • **
  • Posts: 171
for it or against it? (balancing)
« Reply #54 on: August 15, 2004, 02:27:49 PM »
Against

 
Quote
For so far. Worth it just to hear rookies cry and whine.

 
You ARE a rookie dipsh*t.
 
Mullah
Logged

Offline doobs

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1605
for it or against it? (balancing)
« Reply #55 on: August 15, 2004, 03:00:19 PM »
For it
great idea IMHO
Logged
R.I.P JG44
(founding XO)

68KO always remembered

Offline dragoon

  • Copper Member
  • **
  • Posts: 218
so far
« Reply #56 on: August 15, 2004, 03:36:44 PM »
against 15
for 13
undecided: did not tally
no real for or against respose: did not tally

the thread aint over yet. GO AGAINST yee ha
to bad most of the AGAINST players refuse to post on the BBS due to the people who have nothing better to do than flame. everyone has an opinion on this wether its against, for or neutral. to bad they choose to remain silent.

we do pay our 15 per month. its an investment of our time and money for something we consider alot of fun. that 15 per month also gives us the right to try instagate change. the people who complained about the numbers prompted change but im sure it wasnt exacly what they was looking for. now its our turn to complain about the change and try to reverse it or HELP find another solution EVERYONE can be happy with.:aok
Logged

Offline Murdr

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 5608
      • http://479th.jasminemaire.com
for it or against it? (balancing)
« Reply #57 on: August 15, 2004, 03:45:03 PM »
well I wasnt going to participate, but if you're gonna cheerlead


FOR
« Last Edit: August 15, 2004, 04:27:29 PM by Murdr »
Logged

Offline SFCHONDO

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1817
for it or against it? (balancing)
« Reply #58 on: August 15, 2004, 03:49:11 PM »
Well at first I was against it. Now after seeing it in action I am

FOR IT


Logged
        HONDO
DENVER BRONCOS    
   
  Retired from AH

Offline TDeacon

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1553
for it or against it? (balancing)
« Reply #59 on: August 15, 2004, 06:13:43 PM »
Against.  Balancing should be implemented using positive reinforcement, not negative.
Logged
Pages: 1 2 3 [4] 5   Go Up
« previous next »