Author Topic: for it or against it? (balancing)  (Read 1463 times)

Offline X2Lee

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1074
for it or against it? (balancing)
« Reply #60 on: August 15, 2004, 06:44:14 PM »
for.

Offline eskimo2

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 7207
      • hallbuzz.com
for it or against it? (balancing)
« Reply #61 on: August 15, 2004, 07:48:11 PM »
[SIZE=10]For[/SIZE]

eskimo

Offline Arlo

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 24760
for it or against it? (balancing)
« Reply #62 on: August 15, 2004, 08:40:06 PM »
4
____Q

Offline Captain Virgil Hilts

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 6128
for it or against it? (balancing)
« Reply #63 on: August 15, 2004, 09:22:04 PM »
AGAINST
"I haven't seen Berlin yet, from the ground or the air, and I plan on doing both, BEFORE the war is over."

SaVaGe


Offline Goobman

  • Zinc Member
  • *
  • Posts: 27
for it or against it? (balancing)
« Reply #64 on: August 15, 2004, 09:33:11 PM »
AGAINST

Offline Ironblade

  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 401
for it or against it? (balancing)
« Reply #65 on: August 15, 2004, 10:09:13 PM »
Salute All
Against it
Hay St. Boys

Offline TBolt A-10

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1142
      • http://www.picturehangar.com
for it or against it? (balancing)
« Reply #66 on: August 16, 2004, 12:04:37 AM »
Now that I've actually flown under the new rules for a few hours, I'll change my "Neutral" to an "Against"[/b] even though it doesn't seem to affect my German rides much.

This change upsets and alienates many customer...a bad decision, imho.
« Last Edit: August 16, 2004, 12:08:04 AM by TBolt A-10 »

Offline Hades55

  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 387
for it or against it? (balancing)
« Reply #67 on: August 16, 2004, 12:10:33 AM »
I usualy had 10 lalas and 5 spits in my 6, so,
4 it

Offline TBolt A-10

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1142
      • http://www.picturehangar.com
Re: Re: AGAINST1111
« Reply #68 on: August 16, 2004, 12:10:49 AM »
Quote
Originally posted by Overlag
you can fly the planes just not the p51D/La7 etc, big deal, theres loads of other planes

idiot:rolleyes:


Uhh...overlag?  I noticed that the pony and lgay-7 are not the only a/c affected by this change.  The B-17 is restricted, now.  What else...?

Offline roofer

  • Zinc Member
  • *
  • Posts: 49
for it or against it? (balancing)
« Reply #69 on: August 16, 2004, 12:30:26 AM »
against

Offline tapakeg

  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 599
for it or against it? (balancing)
« Reply #70 on: August 16, 2004, 01:32:10 AM »
the B-17's are restricted?
Ok, what planes are restricted, and when are they unavailable? How much of an offset in numbers does it take to make what plane unavailable?

Tapakeg
You know that your landing gear is up and locked when it takes full power to taxi to the terminal

Online Shane

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 7945
for it or against it? (balancing)
« Reply #71 on: August 16, 2004, 02:15:37 AM »
Quote
Originally posted by tapakeg
the B-17's are restricted?
Ok, what planes are restricted, and when are they unavailable? How much of an offset in numbers does it take to make what plane unavailable?

Tapakeg


the higher the imbalance between the largest and smallest country the higher the eny-limiter goes...  which makes sense it whacks the b-17...  i dunno the exact %, but as an example lets say bish have 180 on, rooks 120 and knits 130... at that point the eny-limiter has probably crept up to the mid 20's due te the % differential being 33%. (100 - (120/180))

now with a 60 player differential, and lets be honest, no side ever has their #'s evenly split bewteen two fronts, removing the b-17 only forces the bish to use lower eny'd buffs like a b-26 or a-20 (which have smaller bomb loads), but with the #'s advantage it slows down that pigpile somewhat, requiring a bit more "teamwork" and strategy as opposed to sheer overwhelming numbers in conjunction with the "best" planes.

« Last Edit: August 16, 2004, 02:18:24 AM by Shane »
Surrounded by suck and underwhelmed with mediocrity.
I'm always right, it just takes some poepl longer to come to that realization than others.
I'm not perfect, but I am closer to it than you are.
"...vox populi, vox dei..."  ~Alcuin ca. 798
Truth doesn't need exaggeration.

Offline kevykev56

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1391
for it or against it? (balancing)
« Reply #72 on: August 16, 2004, 03:00:59 AM »
For it!!!

RHIN0
RHIN0 Retired C.O. Sick Puppies Squadron

Offline Kev367th

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 5290
for it or against it? (balancing)
« Reply #73 on: August 16, 2004, 03:52:06 AM »
It's interesting to see when 2 countries get limited also.
AMD Phenom II X6 1100T
Asus M3N-HT mobo
2 x 2Gb Corsair 1066 DDR2 memory

Offline Edbert

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2220
      • http://www.edbert.net
for it or against it? (balancing)
« Reply #74 on: August 16, 2004, 09:06:02 AM »
Its too early to decide for sure, I think we  have give it at least a whole tour before we can tell if it has the effect of evening out the sides. Too many are posting here that their choices are being limited. You still HAVE a choice. You can choose to fly any plane you want or for any country you want, you just cannot choose BOTH is all that has changed.

Put me down as a "FOR", but I reserve the right to change that vote after a month of this test.