« previous next »
Pages: [1]   Go Down

Author Topic: collision survey  (Read 296 times)

Offline rusgates

  • Zinc Member
  • *
  • Posts: 7
collision survey
« on: August 14, 2004, 06:28:07 AM »
simple not here to get in a big discusion just want to know how many people like the new collision update.





I for 1 hate it.
Logged

Offline thrila

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3190
      • The Few Squadron
collision survey
« Reply #1 on: August 14, 2004, 06:38:17 AM »
Well my first 2 sorties after the update ended with me collliding with someone. :D

Collisions are always better on than off though i'm afraid.   Otherwise there will be very unrealistic merges between fighters and attacks on buffs.

However, i'm not entirely sure i did hit the 2 planes i collided with.  At the time i thought i had cleared them.  I'm going to film  all of my sorties to hopefully capture a collision to check.
Logged
"Willy's gone and made another,
Something like it's elder brother-
Wing tips rounded, spinner's bigger.
Unbraced tailplane ends it's figure.
One-O-nine F is it's name-
F is for futile, not for fame."

Offline AKWeav

  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 743
collision survey
« Reply #2 on: August 14, 2004, 06:52:31 AM »
In AH1 I was the ultimate collision recipiant.  When AH2 was first released, had maybe 2.  Had 3 last night, so nah I don't like it.
Logged

Offline Zanth

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1052
      • http://www.a-26legacy.org/photo.htm
collision survey
« Reply #3 on: August 14, 2004, 08:42:31 AM »
If collisions worked Iwould be all for them, but the current implementation isn't working very well.   Surprised HT let it get released in this state actually.
Logged

Offline DREDIOCK

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 17775
collision survey
« Reply #4 on: August 14, 2004, 08:53:32 AM »
Suffered 3 collisions last night.
1 was my own fault and the other two were caused when both of us zigged when we should have zagged.

So far untill I see otherwise I think its the best job they have done yet.

Im for it
Logged
Death is no easy answer
For those who wish to know
Ask those who have been before you
What fate the future holds
It ain't pretty

Offline flyingaround

  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 422
collision survey
« Reply #5 on: August 14, 2004, 09:23:49 AM »
HATE it.  

I'm all for a collision model, but the current one in place flying CLOSE to an nme = collision.  I have 3 films now and on all three there is plenty o' seperation and I get damaged.  

Is there a collision bubble????

Whatever it is, please adjust/tweak it.  Alot of my flying style is to make nme's JUST overshoot me, and instead i'm getin' rammed ( and they missing by a good 50feet)
Logged
WMLute

III/JG26 9th ST WidowMakers

Offline Widewing

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 8801
collision survey
« Reply #6 on: August 14, 2004, 09:32:23 AM »
I suffered a collision last night with a wingless fighter, which was at least 50 feet distant.

Later, I was accused of ramming a guy even though we passed with plenty of seperation on my FE.

The collision model is whacked... Reinstate the bug that eliminated most collisions as it was the only beneficial bug I've ever seen.

Any situation where the connection quality or lack thereof dictates which, if either aircraft, receives damage is untenable and clearly puts some players at a disadvantage they have no control of.

Turn off collisions until a workable solution is devised.

My regards,

Widewing
« Last Edit: August 14, 2004, 09:49:58 AM by Widewing »
Logged
My regards,

Widewing

YGBSM. Retired Member of Aces High Trainer Corps, Past President of the DFC, retired from flying as Tredlite.

Offline Puck

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2980
collision survey
« Reply #7 on: August 14, 2004, 09:39:07 AM »
Does seem to be a pretty big colision bubble.  Got in a few last night; one was a definate hit, a couple seemed to be marginal.

Like the gunnery it will take a bit of getting used to, but once we figure out where the edges are it should be fine.  HT may want to tweak it, they may not; hopefully it'll encourage people to find merge strategy that doesn't involve HO attacks.  In a perfect world the $GANGBANG pilots won't be able to send up their massed La7 HO corps  :D
Logged
//c coad  c coad run  run coad run
main (){char _[]={"S~||(iuv{nkx%K9Y$hzhhd\x0c"},__
,___=1;for(__=___>>___;__<((___<<___<<___<<___<<___
)+(___<<___<<___<<___)-___);__+=___)putchar((_[__
])+(__/((___<<___)+___))-((___&

Offline Redd

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1316
collision survey
« Reply #8 on: August 14, 2004, 09:47:07 AM »
Quote
Originally posted by flyingaround
HATE it.  

I'm all for a collision model, but the current one in place flying CLOSE to an nme = collision.  I have 3 films now and on all three there is plenty o' seperation and I get damaged.  

Is there a collision bubble????

Whatever it is, please adjust/tweak it.  Alot of my flying style is to make nme's JUST overshoot me, and instead i'm getin' rammed ( and they missing by a good 50feet)



Having the same problem here and a have  some film  - cleary missed the other plane and lost a wing.


Not the first time  - started filming as well  to see if I was imagining it.
Logged
I come from a land downunder

Offline Widewing

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 8801
collision survey
« Reply #9 on: August 14, 2004, 09:56:39 AM »
Quote
Originally posted by Puck
In a perfect world the $GANGBANG pilots won't be able to send up their massed La7 HO corps  :D


If the La-7 guy has a slightly faster connection than yours, you will still suffer collisions, while the La-7 takes no damage....

Until an equitable solution is devised that hands out damage to both planes, turn off collisions altogether.

My regards,

Widewing
Logged
My regards,

Widewing

YGBSM. Retired Member of Aces High Trainer Corps, Past President of the DFC, retired from flying as Tredlite.
Pages: [1]   Go Up
« previous next »