Author Topic: Yak-3  (Read 1063 times)

Offline 1K3

  • Parolee
  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3449
Yak-3
« on: August 14, 2004, 08:31:23 PM »
Does anyone know what year this type entered service and how did they perform against the Luftwaffe?

:confused:

Offline Sikboy

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 6702
Yak-3
« Reply #1 on: August 14, 2004, 09:50:34 PM »
The Yak-3 entered service in the Summer of 1944.

It had great success against the Luftwaffe. Some people will claim that the Yak-9U is the better performer, but really they are different beasts. The 3 was a lightweight fighter, that was supposed to have nearly the equal in speed/climb, but better manueverability. The flipside, was that it was a bit more fragile.

-Sik
You: Blah Blah Blah
Me: Meh, whatever.

Offline Fruda

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1267
Yak-3
« Reply #2 on: August 14, 2004, 11:48:04 PM »
It had better roll/turning characteristics. I'd prefer the Yak-3 over the La-7 for Soviet sorties, if they added it...

Offline Krusty

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 26745
Yak-3
« Reply #3 on: August 15, 2004, 12:03:00 AM »
No, it was not the equal to the Yak9....


The Luftwaffe didn't issue commands to pilots NOT to engage the Yak3 under 15k alt (or so), just the Yak9.

The Yak 3 was underpowered, but was more manuverable, from what I remember. The LW didn't have any problems fighting it (at least not the restrictions placed on fighting the Yak9)

Offline Sikboy

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 6702
Yak-3
« Reply #4 on: August 15, 2004, 12:11:58 AM »
Quote
Originally posted by Krusty
No, it was not the equal to the Yak9....


The Luftwaffe didn't issue commands to pilots NOT to engage the Yak3 under 15k alt (or so), just the Yak9.

The Yak 3 was underpowered, but was more manuverable, from what I remember. The LW didn't have any problems fighting it (at least not the restrictions placed on fighting the Yak9)


Err, I thought the order was to avoid combat with "Yakolev fighters without an oil cooler under the nose" (paraphrasing here) which covers both the 3 and the 9U

-Sik
You: Blah Blah Blah
Me: Meh, whatever.

Offline Krusty

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 26745
Yak-3
« Reply #5 on: August 15, 2004, 12:14:57 AM »
I thought it only applied to the 9? *scratches head*

Offline Sikboy

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 6702
Yak-3
« Reply #6 on: August 15, 2004, 12:15:41 AM »
One other thing:

The Yak-9U and Yak-3 both had the Vk-107 engine, yet the Yak3 was a bit lighter. So I don't think it was underpowered.

Maybe you're thinking of the Yak-7?

-Sik
You: Blah Blah Blah
Me: Meh, whatever.

Offline Karnak

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 23046
Yak-3
« Reply #7 on: August 15, 2004, 12:40:07 AM »
Sikboy,

No, the wartime Yak-3 had the VK-105 engine.  The Yak-3 with the VK-107 engine was too late to see service in WWII.
Petals floating by,
      Drift through my woman's hand,
             As she remembers me-

Offline TimRas

  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 560
Yak-3
« Reply #8 on: August 15, 2004, 12:43:38 AM »
According to http://www.wio.ru/tacftr/yak.htm , Yak-3 with VK-107 was too late for WW2 and only 48 were built.

Comparison of Yak-3 and Yak-9U:

Max speed at sea level: 567 / 575 km/h  (352 / 357 mph)
Max speed at altitude: 646 / 672 km/h (401 / 418 mph)
Altitude of max. speed:  4100 / 5000 m (13450 / 16400 ft)
Climb to 5000m (16400ft): 4.5 / 5 min
Turn time: 17 / 19.5 s
Ready weight: 2692 / 3200 kg ( 5930 / 7050 lb )

Yak-3 was much lighter with less engine power,slightly slower, but better climbing and turning.

Yak-3 pics
« Last Edit: August 15, 2004, 03:27:51 AM by TimRas »

Offline Fruda

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1267
Yak-3
« Reply #9 on: August 15, 2004, 03:59:09 AM »
Yes, German pilots were issued warnings about the Yak-3, before the 9U came around. It's in my Military History of WWII book.

Offline Holden McGroin

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 8591
Yak-3
« Reply #10 on: August 15, 2004, 05:34:06 AM »
This is the Yak I want...

445 mph

Holden McGroin LLC makes every effort to provide accurate and complete information. Since humor, irony, and keen insight may be foreign to some readers, no warranty, expressed or implied is offered. Re-writing this disclaimer cost me big bucks at the lawyer’s office!

Offline Widewing

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 8800
Yak-3
« Reply #11 on: August 15, 2004, 11:40:16 AM »
Quote
Originally posted by Holden McGroin
This is the Yak I want...

445 mph



Very nice, and it's only 96 mph slower than this....

(Image removed from quote.)

541 mph ground speed on second leg of world record run... 9 mph tail wind helped.

My regards,

Widewing
My regards,

Widewing

YGBSM. Retired Member of Aces High Trainer Corps, Past President of the DFC, retired from flying as Tredlite.

Offline GScholz

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 8910
Yak-3
« Reply #12 on: August 15, 2004, 12:53:31 PM »
If it was up to me Holden would get his Yak, and Widewing would get his Bearcat ... I don't think either would be much of a threat since both are unarmed racers. ;)
"With the first link, the chain is forged. The first speech censored, the first thought forbidden, the first freedom denied, chains us all irrevocably."

Offline GRUNHERZ

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 13413
Yak-3
« Reply #13 on: August 15, 2004, 01:22:22 PM »


Rarebear wasnt always so fast. Yikes!

Offline 1K3

  • Parolee
  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3449
Yak-3
« Reply #14 on: August 15, 2004, 03:30:26 PM »
what kind of Yak-3 engine did they use in niemen (or whatever that is:confused:) ? the VK 105 or 107?