Author Topic: Job offer. (Read 1091 times)

JBA · « **on:** August 19, 2004, 04:01:21 PM »

As a citizen of the US and therefore an Employer of public officials, I would like for the Democrats on the board to present to me your candidate for the job of President.

I already have a person hired and therefore you cannot badmouth my previous choice, this will not get you hired.

So tell me why I should hire your candidate, John Kerry.

ravells · « **Reply #1 on:** August 19, 2004, 04:20:00 PM »

Apart from being on a fixed term contract, the present employee may well be guilty of gross misconduct which merits a summary dismissal (without notice).

Employees who work in conflict of interest, who perform poorly and whose CV makes terrible reading really ought not to have their contracts renewed.

Perhaps you ought to tell us why a renewal of the present employee's contract is in order?

Ravs

p.s. I do understand that he has a great future after this period of employment of running further organisations into the ground.

Dago · « **Reply #2 on:** August 19, 2004, 05:26:07 PM »

Come on JBA, you know the dems tried to stop selling Kerry, all they can do now is try to convince you not to vote Bush. Too funny.

Ravells just illustrated that point better than I could have hoped too.

dago

Gunslinger · « **Reply #3 on:** August 19, 2004, 05:54:50 PM »

Quote

Originally posted by ravells
Apart from being on a fixed term contract, the present employee may well be guilty of gross misconduct which merits a summary dismissal (without notice).

Employees who work in conflict of interest, who perform poorly and whose CV makes terrible reading really ought not to have their contracts renewed.

Perhaps you ought to tell us why a renewal of the present employee's contract is in order?

Ravs

p.s. I do understand that he has a great future after this period of employment of running further organisations into the ground.

WOW I realize you are from the UK and all and your application really doesnt count

But dodging a question and then answering said question with a question will never get you hired in the US.

capt. apathy · « **Reply #4 on:** August 19, 2004, 06:01:02 PM »

Quote

Originally posted by Dago
Come on JBA, you know the dems tried to stop selling Kerry, all they can do now is try to convince you not to vote Bush. Too funny.

Ravells just illustrated that point better than I could have hoped too.

dago

why do we not spend more time selling Kerry? very simple, the fact that he isn't Bush is more than enough. to point out specifically why Kerry would be more qualified would just be bragging.

the country was in damn good shape before Bush ran it into the ground (I guess thats where his business experience helped him find the fastest and most efficient way to deplete funds with no gain).

to just undo whatever we can that he has done would be an ideal plan.

Gunslinger · « **Reply #5 on:** August 19, 2004, 06:05:25 PM »

Quote

Originally posted by capt. apathy
why do we not spend more time selling Kerry? very simple, the fact that he isn't Bush is more than enough. to point out specifically why Kerry would be more qualified would just be bragging.

the country was in damn good shape before Bush ran it into the ground (I guess thats where his business experience helped him find the fastest and most efficient way to deplete funds with no gain).

to just undo whatever we can that he has done would be an ideal plan.

wow another one.

anyone but Bush.

What if anyone doesnt cut it? what makes kerry so speacial?

truth is....without mentioning Bush you cant answer those questions.

OTOH....I dont need to mention Kerry to define Bush.

capt. apathy · « **Reply #6 on:** August 19, 2004, 06:23:30 PM »

Quote

Originally posted by Gunslinger

What if anyone doesnt cut it?

maybe he won't, at least I have a chance. we already know that Bush don't cut it.

Gunslinger · « **Reply #7 on:** August 19, 2004, 06:27:13 PM »

Quote

Originally posted by capt. apathy
maybe he won't, at least I have a chance. we already know that Bush don't cut it.

so you'd vote for bozo the clown to the office of the presidency? What about David Duke if he was a dem?

I dont see how you can just blindly replace somone just cause you think ANYONE can do a better job.

How do you know they will do a better job than Bush if you know nothing about them?

again what does Kerry have to offer other than the fact that his name is not George W. Bush?

Trell · « **Reply #8 on:** August 19, 2004, 07:32:12 PM »

Quote

Originally posted by Gunslinger
so you'd vote for bozo the clown to the office of the presidency? What about David Duke if he was a dem?

I dont see how you can just blindly replace somone just cause you think ANYONE can do a better job.

How do you know they will do a better job than Bush if you know nothing about them?

again what does Kerry have to offer other than the fact that his name is not George W. Bush?

Its easy, I would rather put bozo the clown in, on the smallest chance he will be better then the ******* in there now. And continue to not reelect anyone for more than one term untill they start getting better.

At work you don't keep a person that you don't think can do the job becasue you are afraid the next guy will be worse. You keep canning them untill you find a good one,

btw I will be voting for Kerry this time. and I will bet I will vote against him in 4 years too.

Gunslinger · « **Reply #9 on:** August 19, 2004, 07:36:29 PM »

Quote

Originally posted by Trell
Its easy, I would rather put bozo the clown in, on the smallest chance he will be better then the ******* in there now. And continue to not reelect anyone for more than one term untill they start getting better.

At work you don't keep a person that you don't think can do the job becasue you are afraid the next guy will be worse. You keep canning them untill you find a good one,

btw I will be voting for Kerry this time. and I will bet I will vote against him in 4 years too.

You can do alot of damage in 4 years. So if there is a 1 in 99% chance that a canidate will do a better chance than the current president he/she has your vote? That's a big gamble when it comes to the fate of the US.

What makes kerry better than Bush?

capt. apathy · « **Reply #10 on:** August 19, 2004, 07:51:48 PM »

Quote

Originally posted by Gunslinger
You can do alot of damage in 4 years. So if there is a 1 in 99% chance that a canidate will do a better chance than the current president he/she has your vote? That's a big gamble when it comes to the fate of the US.

What makes kerry better than Bush?

the odds that he'll do a good job may be 1 in 99% (not sure exactly what that means mathematically but it's your quote. is it 99% chance he'll do good, a 1% chance, or are the odds 99 to 1)

whatever that comes to I could except it, well worth the risk. even if the odds are 100 to 1 that he'd be a good president, the odds that he'd be better than Bush are just about a sure thing.

even if he sets out to completely screw the country, at least we get a bit of a break while he learns how to do it most effectively. on the other hand Bush has 4 years of experience at screwing us and many plans that are already in the works. at least Kerry (if he where to be as bad as you seem to think) would have to start from scratch.

I really can't argue with your first sentence though. Bush has surely proved you right there.

Gunslinger · « **Reply #11 on:** August 19, 2004, 07:59:21 PM »

Quote

Originally posted by capt. apathy
the odds that he'll do a good job may be 1 in 99% (not sure exactly what that means mathematically but it's your quote. is it 99% chance he'll do good, a 1% chance, or are the odds 99 to 1)

whatever that comes to I could except it, well worth the risk. even if the odds are 100 to 1 that he'd be a good president, the odds that he'd be better than Bush are just about a sure thing.

even if he sets out to completely screw the country, at least we get a bit of a break while he learns how to do it most effectively. on the other hand Bush has 4 years of experience at screwing us and many plans that are already in the works. at least Kerry (if he where to be as bad as you seem to think) would have to start from scratch.

I really can't argue with your first sentence though. Bush has surely proved you right there.

what I meant was a 1% chance out of 100 actually but thanks for the correction.

So you think bush is that bad that any level of destruction to this country is that much better?????????

we can trade one idiot for a worse idiot...its only 4 years.....Bush only invaded Iraq....maybe Kerry can be worse?

you can regurgitate this over and over again.

What you cant/wont tell me is what makes kerry better than Bush other than the fact that he's not Bush?

Frodo · « **Reply #12 on:** August 19, 2004, 08:07:24 PM »

" You can do alot of damage in 4 years. "

Gunslinger you are correct indeed. I submit this President and this Administration as proof.

No way they get my vote.

Frodo

Gunslinger · « **Reply #13 on:** August 19, 2004, 08:15:53 PM »

Quote

Originally posted by Frodo
" You can do alot of damage in 4 years. "

Gunslinger you are correct indeed. I submit this President and this Administration as proof.

No way they get my vote.

Frodo

And if John Kerry is worse you vote for him?

Frodo · « **Reply #14 on:** August 19, 2004, 08:44:03 PM »

Well since I can't see into the future as you can, then I will have to base my vote on what I have seen so far from this President and his administration.

So my vote goes to Kerry, and it is not a hard decision at all.

Four more years of this administration scares the heck out of me.

BTW I consider myself an Independent, and have never voted for anything based on political party loyalty. There are way too many people who vote strictly by party on all sides, consequences be damned. This really hurts the country more than we realize I think.

Frodo