Author Topic: B-29 vs. Ta152  (Read 1861 times)

Offline Vudak

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 4819
B-29 vs. Ta152
« on: August 23, 2004, 06:56:58 PM »
How would the B-29 fare against the Ta152?  Would its introduction make the Ta152 make sense?
Vudak
352nd Fighter Group

Offline GRUNHERZ

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 13413
B-29 vs. Ta152
« Reply #1 on: August 23, 2004, 07:16:33 PM »
That matchup is about the only WW2 (sort of) related reason I would want to have B29 in AH.

I think that the B29 would have an easy time with Ta152 in AH. Ta 152 has weak wings and weak anti buff armament that requires getting in close.  It has poor acceleration so it wouyld take it a long time to re position for attacks against very fast B29s.

Offline B17Skull12

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3839
B-29 vs. Ta152
« Reply #2 on: August 23, 2004, 07:23:25 PM »
if a good 152 was in control of the 152 then hand down 152 even with a great bomber pilot.
II/JG3 DGS II

Offline MiloMorai

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 6864
B-29 vs. Ta152
« Reply #3 on: August 23, 2004, 07:36:54 PM »
Depends on which Ta152.

The Ta152H was developed in response to the B-29 but the Ta152C would have wrecked murder on the B-29.

Offline Nefarious

  • Aces High CM Staff
  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 15858
B-29 vs. Ta152
« Reply #4 on: August 23, 2004, 07:42:19 PM »
It would be good in the hands of a skilled pilot.

The Matchup would be fun to see in Aces High, Although I'd rather go against it with a Me262, 163.
There must also be a flyable computer available for Nefarious to do FSO. So he doesn't keep talking about it for eight and a half hours on Friday night!

Offline Angus

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 10057
B-29 vs. Ta152
« Reply #5 on: August 23, 2004, 07:52:53 PM »
What alt and cruising speed does a loaded B29 have?
It was very interesting to carry out the flight trials at Rechlin with the Spitfire and the Hurricane. Both types are very simple to fly compared to our aircraft, and childishly easy to take-off and land. (Werner Mölders)

Offline F4UDOA

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1731
      • http://mywebpages.comcast.net/markw4/index.html
B-29 vs. Ta152
« Reply #6 on: August 23, 2004, 08:30:08 PM »
It would be very difficult for any fighter in AH to destroy a B-29 with a compatent pilot simply because of it's speed.

This aircraft will buzz along at 25K at around 350MPH+/- (Without looking up any performance numbers).

Intercepting it will be hard enough. Tail chases will have low closure speeds meaning more time in the bomber sights.

Even if you have alt. you may only be able to make one run and then you are chasing again.

Barring the 262 or 163 very difficult unless flown at low alt and what would be the point of that.

Offline Krusty

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 26745
B-29 vs. Ta152
« Reply #7 on: August 23, 2004, 09:08:56 PM »
You've just outlined the reasonse why the B-29 should NEVER enter AH2. *Ever.*

Offline Karnak

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 23048
B-29 vs. Ta152
« Reply #8 on: August 23, 2004, 10:12:03 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by Krusty
You've just outlined the reasonse why the B-29 should NEVER enter AH2. *Ever.*

Sure it should, as an expensive perk bomber.
Petals floating by,
      Drift through my woman's hand,
             As she remembers me-

Offline GScholz

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 8910
B-29 vs. Ta152
« Reply #9 on: August 23, 2004, 10:24:39 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by F4UDOA
It would be very difficult for any fighter in AH to destroy a B-29 with a compatent pilot simply because of it's speed.

This aircraft will buzz along at 25K at around 350MPH+/- (Without looking up any performance numbers).

Intercepting it will be hard enough. Tail chases will have low closure speeds meaning more time in the bomber sights.

Even if you have alt. you may only be able to make one run and then you are chasing again.

Barring the 262 or 163 very difficult unless flown at low alt and what would be the point of that.


Your numbers would give the Ta152H-1 a 100 mph speed advantage. The B-29s were more susceptible to damage than earlier bombers like the B-17 and B-24. The pressurized hull for instance would make the German cannons much more effective in ripping the skin off the plane.
"With the first link, the chain is forged. The first speech censored, the first thought forbidden, the first freedom denied, chains us all irrevocably."

Offline Glasses

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1811
B-29 vs. Ta152
« Reply #10 on: August 23, 2004, 11:56:26 PM »
...and Kurt Tank.
Sorry but, no thread can't end talking about the Ta152 without mentioning him ,it just can't :D

Offline simshell

  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 786
B-29 vs. Ta152
« Reply #11 on: August 24, 2004, 04:09:21 AM »
i can see the B29 being the King HQ raider if it ever made in AH
known as Arctic in the main

Offline B17Skull12

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3839
B-29 vs. Ta152
« Reply #12 on: August 24, 2004, 04:54:45 AM »
GScholz i got the same impression, but since i am the ubber n00b at that type of physic's, i wouldn'r know what the damage to the plane i would be.  im but i think the damage would be fatal to say the least because doesn't when a pressurized cabin get a crack that opens up, the plane just about falls apart?:confused:
II/JG3 DGS II

Offline MiloMorai

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 6864
B-29 vs. Ta152
« Reply #13 on: August 24, 2004, 06:20:07 AM »
Quote
Originally posted by GScholz
Your numbers would give the Ta152H-1 a 100 mph speed advantage. The B-29s were more susceptible to damage than earlier bombers like the B-17 and B-24. The pressurized hull for instance would make the German cannons much more effective in ripping the skin off the plane.


The hull was not pressurized, only the crew stations were > cockpit, middle gunners and rear gunner.

They can be seen in this diagram


Offline VO101_Isegrim

  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 577
B-29 vs. Ta152
« Reply #14 on: August 24, 2004, 06:48:04 AM »
Hmm, the Ta 152 would be at least 300 km/h faster than a cruising B-29. Even the Japanese could catch it a number of times.

And, since when a bomber stands much of a chance against an interceptor?