Author Topic: As Kerry demands Bush silence the Swift Boat Veterans (Read 1047 times)

Nash · « **Reply #30 on:** August 25, 2004, 07:29:23 PM »

blah bnlah blah blah blah

Murdr · « **Reply #31 on:** August 25, 2004, 07:32:58 PM »

Quote

Originally posted by Nash
I happen to think that the very existence of this type of an attack is beyond reproach. It goes beyond Kerry/Bush. It ropes in the entire military, past/present/future, and calls everything into doubt. It tarnishes every act of service before and beyond. That may be a little extreme, but hey it's what I think.

And all concocted by a man not fit to polish the shoes of a 16 year-old cadet.

Who is the man you are refering to? Bush? You are completely uninformed if so. Kerrys actions after he returned pissed alot of nam vets off. If anything what you describe as "It ropes in the entire military, past/present/future, and calls everything into doubt. It tarnishes every act of service before and beyond. That may be a little extreme, but hey it's what I think." is exactly the way many feel about Kerrys anti-war activities. You cant blame bush for the enemies that Kerry himself made in the 70s.

These swift boat guys served honorably for their country and have the right to free speech. Meanwhile the Kerry campaign is faxing letters to TV & radio stations around the country hinting at suing them if they run the adds, and trying to stop the publishing and distribution of their book. That is what is beyond reproach. And they call bush a nazi?

GtoRA2 · « **Reply #32 on:** August 25, 2004, 07:34:55 PM »

Nash,
So it is never ok for anyone to question anything about a vets service?

Lets talk hypothetical now.

Say a man claims he is a war hero, he runs for office, and he is in fact not a war hero, never did what he claimed, but did serve. It would be wrong for people to question him if they had evidence of it being faked? )

Case in point was it wrong for people to call out Brian Dennehy (actor first blood etc) when he claimed he was a marine vet and I think he claimed to have served in vietnam?
link

(this is not the case with Kerry, OK the cambodia thing is close, but there is enough questionable stuff out there that I do not know the truth in his case

Gunslinger · « **Reply #33 on:** August 25, 2004, 07:35:56 PM »

Quote

Originally posted by Nash

Now... Me personally... Would I fight Bush on the facts regarding this? I would not. I would call him an arse for this approach. But this angle of attack doesn't merit any substantive point by point defense.

that's just it nash. Most people do not see these as Bush team attack adds. The left and the media have dugg and dugg to find a strong connection and it has been luke warm at best.

Do they (bush/kerry) really dislike these adds against their opponents....I think secretly no but Bush wants all soft money adds to stop and isnt backing down to kerry.

We both agree Kerry is looking like an bellybutton right now.

To top it off the press is just frothing at the mouth at all the juicy political news.

In the end Kerry is screaming and Bush is taking a break nodding his head saying he doesnt like any of this.

What a good day for news!

Nash · « **Reply #34 on:** August 25, 2004, 07:37:33 PM »

Quote

Originally posted by Murdr
Who is the man you are refering to? Bush?

No, this man:

NUKE · « **Reply #35 on:** August 25, 2004, 07:39:44 PM »

blah blah blah

Nash · « **Reply #36 on:** August 25, 2004, 07:40:54 PM »

lol don't cry Nuke.

NUKE · « **Reply #37 on:** August 25, 2004, 07:44:08 PM »

If I cry at all, it's for people like you who see some greatness in Kerry.

Murdr · « **Reply #38 on:** August 25, 2004, 07:50:58 PM »

Quote

Originally posted by NUKE
If I cry at all, it's for people like you who see some greatness in Kerry.

He is great at flip-flopping.

Murdr · « **Reply #39 on:** August 25, 2004, 07:52:41 PM »

Quote

Originally posted by Murdr
Who is the man you are refering to? Carl Rove? You are completely uninformed if so. Kerrys actions after he returned pissed alot of nam vets off. If anything what you describe as "It ropes in the entire military, past/present/future, and calls everything into doubt. It tarnishes every act of service before and beyond. That may be a little extreme, but hey it's what I think." is exactly the way many feel about Kerrys anti-war activities. You cant blame bush for the enemies that Kerry himself made in the 70s.

These swift boat guys served honorably for their country and have the right to free speech. Meanwhile the Kerry campaign is faxing letters to TV & radio stations around the country hinting at suing them if they run the adds, and trying to stop the publishing and distribution of their book. That is what is beyond reproach. And they call bush a nazi?

Still says the same thing doesnt it?

Nash · « **Reply #40 on:** August 25, 2004, 07:55:50 PM »

That only contained what, 4 or 5 non sequiturs? Nice work.

Captain Virgil Hilts · « **Reply #41 on:** August 25, 2004, 07:59:57 PM »

Quote

Originally posted by Lizking
If Kerry was 100% sure of his facts, he would simply reiterate them instead of attacking the persons making the allegations. wouldn't you?

No, if Kerry were 100% sure of his facts, 100% proud of his actions, and 100% convinced it would win him the race, he'd disclose all of his records and prove it. Says all you need to say about it.

Eagler · « **Reply #42 on:** August 25, 2004, 10:18:26 PM »

Quote

Originally posted by Nash
blah bnlah blah blah blah

what skerry speech/promise is that from?

Nash · « **Reply #43 on:** August 25, 2004, 10:24:52 PM »

Whoah Eagler... a lapse?

You forgot to add your signature "LOL".

Too bad, because I liked that "LOL".

I got to picture you, red-faced, with fingers sliding all over the keyboard due to the spit, angry, bitter, and capping the whole rant off with "LOL".

GtoRA2 · « **Reply #44 on:** August 25, 2004, 10:27:31 PM »

Nash
What about my question above man...
I feel so ignored!:D