Author Topic: What is so wrong with the Perk Plane system? Its a good thing...  (Read 658 times)

Offline Dingy

  • Zinc Member
  • *
  • Posts: 71
      • http://www.33rd.org
What is so wrong with the Perk Plane system? Its a good thing...
« Reply #30 on: December 06, 2000, 09:07:00 AM »
 
Quote
Originally posted by Lephturn:
Oh yeah, and if you think the Jug is ugly, you must like those skinny waif-like model chicks that look like skeletons.  I like my planes and my women with a little more meat on 'em.  My Jug is a beautiful full figured gal.  


So THATS why you have that squad logo of Rosanne Barr on the side of your plane!!  I just thought you were a fan of her show  

-Ding

Offline hblair

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 4052
      • http://www.cybrtyme.com/personal/hblair/mainpage.htm
What is so wrong with the Perk Plane system? Its a good thing...
« Reply #31 on: December 06, 2000, 10:20:00 AM »
What SOB said.

Funny how people can give their opinion on something thats not even here yet. Remember how controversial combat trim and padlock[/b] were before they were implemented? Do you ever hear about them now?

 

[This message has been edited by hblair (edited 12-06-2000).]

Offline Westy

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2871
What is so wrong with the Perk Plane system? Its a good thing...
« Reply #32 on: December 06, 2000, 10:38:00 AM »
.

[This message has been edited by Westy (edited 12-06-2000).]

Offline mrfish

  • Parolee
  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2343
What is so wrong with the Perk Plane system? Its a good thing...
« Reply #33 on: December 06, 2000, 10:56:00 AM »
to me the me-262 looks kinda like a plecostomus - it will be fun shooting them down

Offline Lephturn

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1200
      • http://lephturn.webhop.net
What is so wrong with the Perk Plane system? Its a good thing...
« Reply #34 on: December 06, 2000, 11:05:00 AM »
LOL Dingy.  Hahaha.  Not quite THAT full-figured.    Maybe Anna Nicole Smith. <G>

 

Mr. Pig is much cooler, but still fits the "full figured" image.  

BTW Lazs,
HTC is only implementing the perk system so they can get planes and vehicles in the game that people want.  The trick is to do that without un-balancing the arena too much.  In answer to your question "why do it", it's because HTC will attract more people to the game if there is the ability to pilot some of these late-war killers that don't show up in most other sims.  Just another way for HTC to try to attract more folks to Aces High.  Sure, they'll likely lose a few players because of it, but they think they'll gain far more than they lose.  I think they are right.    What we think is pretty much irrelevant however, since this is purely a business decision that HTC has made.

I'm looking forward to my P-47N!  

------------------
Lephturn - Chief Trainer
A member of The Flying Pigs  http://www.flyingpigs.com
 
"A pig is a jolly companion, Boar, sow, barrow, or gilt --
A pig is a pal, who'll boost your morale, Though mountains may topple and tilt.
When they've blackballed, bamboozled, and burned you, When they've turned on you, Tory and Whig,
Though you may be thrown over by Tabby and Rover, You'll never go wrong with a pig, a pig,
You'll never go wrong with a pig!" -- Thomas Pynchon, "Gravity's Rainbow"

Hans

  • Guest
What is so wrong with the Perk Plane system? Its a good thing...
« Reply #35 on: December 07, 2000, 03:24:00 AM »
HTC may also be trying to get out of the same mold of Air Warrior, Fighter Ace and WarBirds.  Right now those games are cheaper, and are very similar.

HTC doesn't have too much over their competion to draw more customers.

And when WW2Online is out, HTC might even loose customers.

So, maybe HiTech and Pyro are trying something else to get away from the rest of the pack.  The 1945 planeset.

I still think Aces High is boring right now.  I want the Perk system because I want something new to do and a tangible goal to fight for.

Hans.

-lazs-

  • Guest
What is so wrong with the Perk Plane system? Its a good thing...
« Reply #36 on: December 07, 2000, 08:29:00 AM »
lep... that is of course, the crux of it.... It is not my decision.   I am simply stating that the perk plane idea is not well thot out.   I don't see how it would attract new people as they would not be able to fly one of these "perk" planes during their two week free period anyway.   If they could... it would be an even worse implementation than even I imagine.

If the purpose is to get late war planes into the arena and therefor  "attract" new players....Wouldn't it be better to have one day every two weeks where everyone was allowed to "wring out" these so called perk planes?   Wouldn't it be better to have a late (and early) war area whithin the current arena so that people could fly them if they wished?

The idiotic "perk" system is a lopsided dead end.   Unless you feel that early war planes have no following (battle of Britan, Midway, etc.).   The so called "perk" system  takes us even further from getting early war planes and makes flying late war oddballs the whole point of the sim.

With these superplanes available 24/7 but to only a select few... you NEVER have a fair arena plane choice wise.   Even something as bad as a superplane day every two weeks is preferable to a perk system.
lazs

Offline Lephturn

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1200
      • http://lephturn.webhop.net
What is so wrong with the Perk Plane system? Its a good thing...
« Reply #37 on: December 07, 2000, 08:42:00 AM »
lazs,

Where we disagree is in the area of how "well thought out" this perk system is.  Pyro, HT, and the gang at HTC have been in this industry for many, many years.  Their business and livelyhood depend on the success of this game.  I KNOW they have thought, argued, debated, hashed out this idea for a very long time.  They also do things like market research and use the stats they gather from their own business.  Basically, they have a whole lot more information to base this decision on than you or I do, and they've thought about it harder and longer than anybody here.  That's a simple fact IMNSHO.

In short, I trust HTC's judgement in this area over everybody else's.  They have more information, more experience, and more investment in the decision than anybody else.  You can disagree with their ideas if you wish, but you've got to respect the effort they put into it.  On top of that, none of us have even seen this thing actually implemented.  Try to keep an open mind, and we'll see how it goes.  

------------------
Lephturn - Chief Trainer
A member of The Flying Pigs  http://www.flyingpigs.com
 
"A pig is a jolly companion, Boar, sow, barrow, or gilt --
A pig is a pal, who'll boost your morale, Though mountains may topple and tilt.
When they've blackballed, bamboozled, and burned you, When they've turned on you, Tory and Whig,
Though you may be thrown over by Tabby and Rover, You'll never go wrong with a pig, a pig,
You'll never go wrong with a pig!" -- Thomas Pynchon, "Gravity's Rainbow"

lazs

  • Guest
What is so wrong with the Perk Plane system? Its a good thing...
« Reply #38 on: December 07, 2000, 11:51:00 AM »
point taken lep...  Not my call.  

I do feel I have as much right to voice my disgust with the idiotic "perk" idea as the butt smootchers have in praising such a lopsided scheme.   I also feel that I have brought up some legitimate concerns that may not have been addressed during all this "research".   Such as.... the effect on early war plane introduction.  
lazs