Author Topic: Trees are not bunkers (Read 1276 times)

tce2506 · « **Reply #15 on:** October 07, 2004, 01:15:37 PM »

Personally, I don't have a problem with it. It makes up for the Icon giving away your position. Ther's no way a plane should be able to spot a tank hidden under the trees.

Tails · « **Reply #16 on:** October 07, 2004, 09:25:59 PM »

I guess that is one way to look at it. Either having trees you can bomb through but no icon, or an icon and bunker trees.
In truth, the former I would like a little more, but I guess until that gets changed the latter will have to do.

tce2506 · « **Reply #17 on:** October 08, 2004, 07:02:04 AM »

Yes, I would also prefer that the trees weren't so protective. But, I'm not going to complain untill they fix the Icon thing!!

FuBaR · « **Reply #18 on:** October 08, 2004, 10:43:54 AM »

I think we need NAPALM FIRRRREEEE FFFFFIIIIIIIIREEEEEEEEEEEEEEE EEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE EEEE.

Tails · « **Reply #19 on:** October 08, 2004, 06:36:42 PM »

Fubar, did you forget your meds again?

Wolfala · « **Reply #20 on:** October 09, 2004, 12:45:13 PM »

Tree's should be seen as concealment against visual sighting. They should not be considered cover especially against a Line Backer type raid against a panzer.

FuBaR · « **Reply #21 on:** October 09, 2004, 07:28:19 PM »

Wolfala

Wolfala · « **Reply #22 on:** October 10, 2004, 12:23:37 AM »

Hoorah! Nor cal!

Aces High Bulletin Board