Iran makes Israel glow in the dark...then..

[Arlo]

I wonder if they could add another "octain" for irradiated gasoline? I wonder if it would cost more or less?

(Arlo pulls up to the pumps at night. One of the pumps is glowing. Arlo goes in to pay.)

Arlo: One of your pumps is glowing.

Attendant: Yeah ... that's our new "HFO" fuel.

Arlo: HFO fuel?

Attendent: High Fission Octain.

Arlo: Fission?

Attendant: Yeah ... it's nookalar.

Arlo: Nookalar?

Attendant: Nookalar! Nookalar!

Arlo: Ok .... nookalar. I noticed it costs an extra dollar a gallon. Is it, like, really super high octain or will it clean my valves or give me better gas milage?

Attendant: I don't think so .... but it will make your gums bleed and your hair fall out.

Arlo: Far out! Fill `er up!

[GRUNHERZ]

Hortlund your reasoinig is rearded if you think that Pakistan nukes are not a danger to be stolen by terrorists.

As for Iran nuclear weapons are easy to trace to their source, any country giving them to terrorists (just like you now proposed as your most likely Iranian attack via hezzbollah terrorists) would be found out easily and then dealt with. Not to mention that a transfer through lebanon would most certinly imply syraian knowledge which makes all of it quite cumbersome to pull off withoput mossad getting a wiff of it..
None of it is as simple as you think.. They will be traced to point of origin and the point of origin wull be wiped out..  

But yea Iran is evil now and pakistan (well at least the president of pakistan, while he evades the latest assasinatyion attempt) is our friend now so you are gonna spin yiour little stories to fit the current conditions... IMO thats basically why you dismiss the potential danger of existant pakistani nukes ending up in terror hands and why you hype up the danger of hypothetical future Irianian nukes.  


As for you insults I dont really care, we have all noticed its pretty much SOP for you when somebody doesnt give into your point of view in short order.. So yea go insult people..

[Gixer]

Originally posted by Hortlund
SaburoS

This is the most plausible scenario for Iranian nuke-use.

1) Nuke smuggled into Israel via Lebanon and Hezbollah
2) Nuke detonated in Tel Aviv
3) Someone else (Al Qaeda) takes blame

Actually there would be 5 steps to that scenario.

4) Uranium traces from the blast are identified as coming from   Iranian reactors.
5) Israel and/or US Nukes Iran off the map for good.


And yes they really can trace the source of the uranium used where it was enriched and even the batch date.


...-Gixer

[GRUNHERZ]

Originally posted by Hortlund
SaburoS

This is the most plausible scenario for Iranian nuke-use.

1) Nuke smuggled into Israel via Lebanon and Hezbollah
2) Nuke detonated in Tel Aviv
3) Someone else (Al Qaeda) takes blame

So all this deception effort by luntic Irianian moslem cleric suicide bombers, why? To hide the true origin of the weapons and so avoid a retaliory nuclear strike on Iran? SURELY NOT! I thought you said reciprocal destruction wasnt a concern for said lunatic iranian clerics?  

Pffft hortlund, pretty sloppy there - for an adult...

[Gixer]

"As for you insults I dont really care, we have all noticed its pretty much SOP for you when somebody doesnt give into your point of view in short order.. So yea go insult people.."


I always wonder why people so often resort to personal insults. Especially when arguing over some point on a message board.

I just assume they are menstruating. and carry on.



...-Gixer

[Hortlund]

4) Uranium traces from the blast are identified as coming from   Iranian reactors.
5) Israel and/or US Nukes Iran off the map for good.

---------------------------------------

Steps 4 and 5 would come weeks or months after the fact, and there would not be any retaliatory strike coming from the US after that. Like I said, US public opinion cannot stomach 40 killed wedding guests, but you guys sit here and think you would launch a nuke on Teheran. That is so dumb it boogles the mind.

[GRUNHERZ]

So once agin Hortlund's position is that isreal can be nuked with no reciprocal consequences to the attcakers...

That boggles the mind... In fact thats just plain silly...

BTW before yoiu try to weazel your way out of your comments lets remember that you expressed dounbts about Isreal ability to respond after such an attcak. So its pretty clear where you stand.

[Hortlund]

So, since Im supporting Israel Im a nazi? Read a history book you dumb f**k.

[Hortlund]

My stand is that Iran should never be allowed to have nukes, and Im all for a pre-emptive strike against Iran if that is what it takes to keep them from having nukes. Now go **** yourself you fat ****.

[bozon]

Iran does not build nuclear missiles to hit Israel. They build nuclear missiles as an insurance that the Iraq scenario will not repeat itself in Iran. Once they have them, they will be safe of US invasion.

Israel is just the hostage, plus it sends vibes of joy in the muslim world when someone threatens Israel.

Nuclear weapon is an insurance of not loosing a war - not a mean to start/win it.

Bozon

[SaburoS]

Originally posted by Hortlund
SaburoS

This is the most plausible scenario for Iranian nuke-use.

1) Nuke smuggled into Israel via Lebanon and Hezbollah
2) Nuke detonated in Tel Aviv
3) Someone else (Al Qaeda) takes blame
4) Uranium traces from the blast are identified as coming from Iranian reactors.
5) Israel and/or US Nukes Iran off the map for good.

LOL!!!  

Hey this is almost as "plausible" as your Saddam's Al Quaida Sleeper cells in the US with their mass mail Anthrax attack!

So just how are they gonna smuggle an Atomic bomb into Israel without detection?  How big is it going to be? Will it be a nuclear or atomic warhead? You really think they can manufacture 1 megaton warheads/bombs? How many will they manufature?

They are smart enough to manufacture their own atomic bomb, but stupid enough to leave possible evidence? Pure fiction, dude.

How about we try this more plausible scenario:

After seeing the US plan and execute a major invasion and occupation of Iraq (Iran's long standing, historical enemy), Iran feels that it definately needs to have an "equalizer" to protect itself. They have been publicly targeted by the same administration that has pulled off the Iraq invasion/occupation.
They feel they have no alternative now because if they did have nukes, we wouldn't be rattling our sabres against them.

Iran has more to fear from it's Arab neighbors and the US rather than Israel. Recent to distant history bears this out.

[SaburoS]

Originally posted by Hortlund
My stand is that Iran should never be allowed to have nukes, and Im all for a pre-emptive strike against Iran if that is what it takes to keep them from having nukes. Now go **** yourself you fat ****.

LOL, you know that you are awful "brave" with US troops when it comes to pre-emptive strikes. How about you get off your tush in front of your monitor and show real conviction and get yourself over there?

Here's a tip for you as when Skuzzy gets back, we're going to see a lot of posts by you replaced with "personal attack"

Maybe you're just not as bright as you think you are.

[Hortlund]

And for some reason you think that your posts will not be considered personal attacks... Pot..kettle...all that.

[GRUNHERZ]

Originally posted by Hortlund
My stand is that Iran should never be allowed to have nukes, and Im all for a pre-emptive strike against Iran if that is what it takes to keep them from having nukes. Now go **** yourself you fat ****.

I love it!  Grunherz you are wrong and I am right because you eat too much!!!  

What a moron you are acting like hortlund.. And to think you called for more "adult" behahivor from others..

Loser! Now go get drunk and hope to forget how pitiful your childish behavior is..

[Muckmaw1]

Your fat, Grun?

I always pictured you as being quite wirey.