Author Topic: Question about UN (Read 1057 times)

Pongo · « **Reply #45 on:** October 11, 2004, 03:36:35 PM »

You dont invade a country because they have a terrorist problem. You invade them because they are a terrorist problem.

And yes. The whole country was afraid of Sadam. And with Western airpower constantly over his country and him trying as hard as he could to get sanctions lifted he made sure that he had no terrorist problem. The US supported him particularly in QUELLING INSURGENCY that was the big fear and focus of the US all through the 70s and 80s..

You can just admit you know absolutly nothing about the topic and crawl back into your fantasy world.

Staga · « **Reply #46 on:** October 15, 2004, 09:36:17 AM »

Quote

US vetoes Gaza action

THE US has vetoed a resolution demanding Israel immediately end military operations in the northern Gaza Strip and withdraw its troops, saying the measure was "unbalanced".

The vote in the Security Council was 11 in favour, one against, and three abstentions.

And then some are b1tching why UN is ineffective. UN needs a new system where one single veto isn't enough so US won't be able to hamper UN's work

GRUNHERZ · « **Reply #47 on:** October 15, 2004, 01:16:31 PM »

Quote

Originally posted by Staga
And then some are b1tching why UN is ineffective. UN needs a new system where one single veto isn't enough so US won't be able to hamper UN's work

You know staga we seldom agree but here yiu are right. The UN really needs a new way to get its business done without the US gettingin the way.

I propose that the US leaves the UN, then everyting will be fine!

Staga · « **Reply #48 on:** October 15, 2004, 01:27:09 PM »

US was crying when EU decided to built its own army, not dependant of NATO, so do you really think US would leave UN ?

Your new homeland is trying its best to stay in heavy weight series but your economy is about fcked up and China and Russia are advancing fast...
Hell will freeze before US leaves UN, even if we both think it would be good for both