Author Topic: Bill Clinton as UN Secretary General? (Read 1509 times)

Vudak · « **on:** October 22, 2004, 11:38:13 PM »

I have no article, no links, no source, no nothing. I' m pretty much useless. But I did see an article that said Bill Clinton would like to be in charge of UN when Annan's term runs out in 2006.

The article also said he'd enjoy overwhelming support from nearly all members, except, of course, an America run by W.

What do you all think of this? I'd personally like to see him in there and don't really see why Bush should have such a problem with it. It's not like he heeds the UN, anyway.

Rip it to shreds, my less moderate republican party-mates, rip it to shreds

Nash · « **Reply #1 on:** October 22, 2004, 11:40:08 PM »

Makes sense to me...

GRUNHERZ · « **Reply #2 on:** October 22, 2004, 11:40:49 PM »

I basically like Clinton and I hope it stays that way, so no, I dont want him anywhere near the UN... However if he can get the UN to act agressively like Clinton acted in Bosnia and Kosovo then I might not mind. But I doubt he could pull it off...

Vudak · « **Reply #3 on:** October 23, 2004, 12:01:59 AM »

You know though he is really respected in many parts of the world and he's a much better persuader then Bush will ever be. He might actually be able to get the UN to do what it was envisioned to do after all...

I'd put money on him doing an alright job. I think he showed he could handle it during his presidency.

rpm · « **Reply #4 on:** October 23, 2004, 12:12:26 AM »

I like the idea.

NUKE · « **Reply #5 on:** October 23, 2004, 12:16:10 AM »

Can you imagine how bad that would be for America?

Clinton as head of the UN would undermine the President by default. Bad idea.

Clinton would be seen as America's voice.... totaly undermining our President.

Nash · « **Reply #6 on:** October 23, 2004, 12:22:05 AM »

What yer saying Nuke, is that next to Clinton, Bush is like, 2" tall.

NUKE · « **Reply #7 on:** October 23, 2004, 12:30:07 AM »

Quote

Originally posted by Nash
What yer saying Nuke, is that next to Clinton, Bush is like, 2" tall.

What I am saying is:

ANY former US President that became UN President would undermine the current US President severely.

Nash, I never mentioned Bush

JB73 · « **Reply #8 on:** October 23, 2004, 01:29:29 AM »

Billary as a seceratary?!?!??!

who'll file the sexual harassment suit????

B17Skull12 · « **Reply #9 on:** October 23, 2004, 01:31:13 AM »

only if health imporves.

FUNKED1 · « **Reply #10 on:** October 23, 2004, 01:55:31 AM »

Weasel In Chief, perfect job for him.
He is very persuasive with women and foreign liberals. They seem to eat up his lies. If he were properly motivated he could be a great help for America.

Vudak · « **Reply #11 on:** October 23, 2004, 01:59:18 AM »

Quote

Originally posted by NUKE
What I am saying is:

ANY former US President that became UN President would undermine the current US President severely.

But... Why?

Or, better yet, How?

By having a better idea then the president, and having that idea be well taken by Americans and the world is the only way I can think of... And that's not neccesarily a bad thing...

Shuckins · « **Reply #12 on:** October 23, 2004, 02:56:27 AM »

As one of Clinton's fellow Arkies I feel free to say that his shreckless, narcicistic, self-aggrandizing, reckless and schmoozing persona would fit the U.N. like a glove.

I think he should go for it.

Fishu · « **Reply #13 on:** October 23, 2004, 03:03:14 AM »

Quote

Originally posted by GRUNHERZ
However if he can get the UN to act agressively like Clinton acted in Bosnia and Kosovo then I might not mind. But I doubt he could pull it off...

Aggressively.. like give mandates to assaults reasoned with lies?
Sounds to me like the very reason which UN was created to prevent.

GRUNHERZ · « **Reply #14 on:** October 23, 2004, 03:07:22 AM »

Fishu how can you justify such a statement when all of us know exactly what happrned in Srebrenica where 8,000 refugees were murdered, excaly what happened (on TV often) in Sarajevo, and what we all saw was staring to happend iall over again n Kosovo?

So are you saying the Un was created to prevent efforts to stop genocides?

How on earth can you be aginst NATO mulinational operations that stopped genocides?????

I know yiu hate america, but do you hate it so much that you support genocides that america intervend in and stopped?