Author Topic: ki84 speed????  (Read 16990 times)

Offline GRUNHERZ

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 13413
ki84 speed????
« Reply #60 on: November 01, 2004, 04:02:12 PM »
Lets everyone cut the cospiracy crap... Its just retarted from both sides...

Offline humble

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 6434
ki84 speed????
« Reply #61 on: November 01, 2004, 04:02:52 PM »
Karnak,

It's not the speed (which seems low)...it's the pitiful overall performance compared to other similiar planes. Obviously I'm basing this on one flight, but it just bled out E wise vs a poorly flown spitty. I'd of been better of in a P40-B...in a Ki or F6F I'd of eaten the spitty up. I expected the Frank to handle on par with the spitty or even a touch better than the spit IX. Certainly as well as the F6F....didnt seem to be even close to me.

On a seperate "topic" I've seen various mentions of MW-50 or such...I thought this was the "WEP" for the 190. If in fact the Ki-84 had MW-50 isnt that WEP...I thought it was carried in a seperate tank and added as needed for additional performance???

"The beauty of the second amendment is that it will not be needed until they try to take it."-Pres. Thomas Jefferson

Offline Karnak

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 23047
ki84 speed????
« Reply #62 on: November 01, 2004, 04:05:10 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by GRUNHERZ
Lets everyone cut the cospiracy crap... Its just retarted from both sides...

I agree.  It isn't a conspiracy.  There are multiple Allied rides that also seem to be on the low end of their performance specs.


However I am very confused about the Ki-84.  It kinda feels like a kid who expected a bike under the tree for Christmas and found underwear.:p
Petals floating by,
      Drift through my woman's hand,
             As she remembers me-

Offline vorticon

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 7935
ki84 speed????
« Reply #63 on: November 01, 2004, 04:18:52 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by Karnak

However I am very confused about the Ki-84.  It kinda feels like a kid who expected a bike under the tree for Christmas and found underwear.:p


more like hoping for lance armstrongs bike, expecting something reasonably good, and getting a CCM...

Offline Wotan

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 7201
ki84 speed????
« Reply #64 on: November 01, 2004, 04:58:27 PM »
388mph and no water methanol....

WOW!!! :eek:

At least we know it won't be perked.

Can anyone here post the power settings from the clipboard?

Offline eddiek

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1440
Patience, gentlemen.........
« Reply #65 on: November 01, 2004, 05:00:16 PM »
Pyro already commented that he had found the reason for the lower than expected performance, yet we still see folks commenting as if they are seeing the final product.
I would expect to see a patch from Pyro and an attending explanation sometime tonight, or early tomorrow morning.
I too was looking forward to seeing the Ki84, as I had a blast with it in Brand W, but who is gonna quibble over 4 mph (388 vs 392mph)?
As an aside, I too am surprised at the mention of no WEP, but Pyro addressed that also with his comment that Busa is looking into it as we speak.

Be patient..........we'll get that Nipponese superplane you all crave.......:p

Offline Karnak

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 23047
ki84 speed????
« Reply #66 on: November 01, 2004, 05:00:44 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by Wotan
388mph and no water methanol....

WOW!!! :eek:

Worse, it is exactly the same speed as the N1K2-J at SL, 324mph.
:(
Petals floating by,
      Drift through my woman's hand,
             As she remembers me-

Offline Tarmac

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3988
ki84 speed????
« Reply #67 on: November 01, 2004, 05:06:02 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by Wotan
Can anyone here post the power settings from the clipboard?


Military:  2900rpm @ 250mm manifold
Normal:  2650rpm @ 100mm manifold

Offline Tarmac

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3988
ki84 speed????
« Reply #68 on: November 01, 2004, 05:08:38 PM »
Ok check news, patch out.

ed: aren't we all glad it didn't come out Friday afternoon when we'd have had to fly our neutered Ki all weekend?

Offline Karnak

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 23047
Re: Patience, gentlemen.........
« Reply #69 on: November 01, 2004, 05:10:01 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by eddiek
Pyro already commented that he had found the reason for the lower than expected performance, yet we still see folks commenting as if they are seeing the final product.
I would expect to see a patch from Pyro and an attending explanation sometime tonight, or early tomorrow morning.
I too was looking forward to seeing the Ki84, as I had a blast with it in Brand W, but who is gonna quibble over 4 mph (388 vs 392mph)?
As an aside, I too am surprised at the mention of no WEP, but Pyro addressed that also with his comment that Busa is looking into it as we speak.

Be patient..........we'll get that Nipponese superplane you all crave.......:p

No we won't.  All the numbers I've been refering to are Pyro's intended numbers, not the numbers it actually hits.

It is useless as it is.  It brings absolutely no balance to late war Pac setups and is far, far inferior to the N1K2-J for MA purposes when using Pyros numbers.

As to the speed at altitude, who cares.  388mph or 427mph makes no difference as that isn't where the fighting takes place.  The speed that matters on all aircraft is the speed at SL and 324mph does absolutely nothing in the MA.  It is a joke.

I am frankly in utter disbelief about the performance numbers chosen by HTC.  I didn't expect 363mph and 427mph and would have agreed with anybody saying those were too high.  However it is absurd to use the performance numbers on the first prototype from early 1943 as the basis of the performance of the Ki-84 with many improvments and a more powerful engine from mid-1944.
Petals floating by,
      Drift through my woman's hand,
             As she remembers me-

Offline Mitsu

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2763
      • Himitsu no blog (Mitsu's secret blog - written by Japanese)
ki84 speed????
« Reply #70 on: November 01, 2004, 05:11:04 PM »
Full power bug is fixed in Patch 1.
But still NO WEP.

The Ki-84 had Emergency (1 min) Power at 3000rpm/400mm(350mm?).
plane has over boost setting. NO WEP is weird...

Anyway, we need to discuss about this.
« Last Edit: November 01, 2004, 05:24:45 PM by Mitsu »

Offline GRUNHERZ

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 13413
ki84 speed????
« Reply #71 on: November 01, 2004, 05:13:57 PM »
New deck top speed is 323mph with 100% fuel.

Offline john9001

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 9453
ki84 speed????
« Reply #72 on: November 01, 2004, 05:20:11 PM »
i would like to see the poor quailty of the late war japanese aircraft engines modeled, go full throttle and you just might puke your engine.

Offline Wotan

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 7201
ki84 speed????
« Reply #73 on: November 01, 2004, 05:22:21 PM »
Quote
The 388 mph (624 kph) figure is for "standard maximum speed" at +250 boost.


Quote
The same manual gives the aircraft's take off boost as +400mm.


Quote
Clearly the Type 4 fighter could fly faster than 388 mph if the pilot increased power above +250. The question then becomes, how much faster. The manual doesn't answer that question.


Quote
AIREVIEW's General View of Japanese Military Aircraft In ThePacific War, Vol.1,pg.320:

Ha-45/11 NK9-B(IJN-nomenclature)
HP(T.O.): 1,800 @ 400mmHg & 2,900rpm
HP(2,000m/6,562-ft): 1,650 @ 250mmHg & same-rpm
HP(5,700m/18,701-ft): 1,460 @ 250mmHg & same-rpm


So the AH2 Ki-84 can't go above 250mmHg even on take off?

Offline Karnak

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 23047
ki84 speed????
« Reply #74 on: November 01, 2004, 05:28:12 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by john9001
i would like to see the poor quailty of the late war japanese aircraft engines modeled, go full throttle and you just might puke your engine.

Can I have P-40 and F4F engines puking all over the place in the early war too?

What?  That's not OK?
Petals floating by,
      Drift through my woman's hand,
             As she remembers me-