Originally posted by lazs2
karnak... you really can't see the difference between coulter and moore?
coulter doesn't drive voters away... she is ded right on the following...
"To Michael Moore, George Soros, Terry McAuliffe, Dan Rather, Al Franken and the whole gang at Air America Radio – you were great, guys! Thanks for the help! We couldn't have done it without you! "
you can't pretend that these people are helping your party and wink and nod at their behaviour. People really do see who is backing them.
lazs
That's like claiming Ann Coulter, Rush Limbaugh and Michael Savage drive people voters away.
Both sides extremists do so to some moderates and lots of Conservatives/Liberals.
I could no more concieve of voting for a party that thinks the likes of Coulter is reasonable than you could of a party that thinks the likes of Moore is reasonable. She drove me away and he drove you away equally.
I think you're letting your bias get in the way of honestly looking at what she says and how she says it.
There are certainly reasons why the Dems lost this election, but those you listed had very little to do with it. A much bigger factor, I think, was the reaction of Evangelical Christians to the gay marriage issue that really motivated them to get out and vote. Three million more of them voted in this election than in the last and they voted overwhelming for Bush.
There are some interesting exit polls showing the tremendous divergence in the concerns of Kerry voters and Bush voters. The radical spigots of vileness on both sides have more effect in motivating their respective extremes than in influencing anybody on the other side, though I grant you that Michael Moore may have managed to cross that line to a limited degree.