Originally posted by Curval
What are these "lords" spending their cash on? Munchies?
like he said, law enforcement agencies have already seized their assets.
thanks to some really stupid laws, the agency that arrests someone can determine that their assets are from drug profit and keep their property or sell it and add the cash to their budgets. depending on the area and the rules they are operating under they often do this before the person ever gets a trial (since the law says your assets can be seized if you are arrested, not convicted)
you get things like corvettes given a coat of ugly paint and being used as cop cars. or they paint them up black, give them some stickers and use them for props in the 'DARE' program.
as I see it there are a few huge problems with these sort of laws.
1. it encourages cops to lie to get a conviction. loss of this money can leave them understaffed or under funded so some will find it worth lying to improve their safety, or in the case of assets that were disposed of before the trial they would be very motivated to make sure the guy was convicted to avoid the risk of these cash cows being canceled due to innocent people having their assets seized.
2. these seized assets increase their operating budgets, so it encourages them to go after criminals who have more money or cooler toys instead of those who are the biggest threat. (this in particular applies to what airhead was saying. law enforcement agencies already have the guys money and toys, so their is no profit to motivate other agencies to do their job.)
one example of this is a local law that says the car you are driving can be confiscated if you are arrested for picking up prostitutes or driving on a license that was suspended for DUI. the cars are sold at a profit, usually before the guy ever gets a trial (so you lose your right to due process), also the car doesn't even have to belong to the driver to be stolen by the city.
another issue that really shows that it's a revenue scam and not any sort of real deterrent is that unless the city can get enough money for a car (to cover the administrative expense in disposing of it) the don't take them. seems to me that if the point was really to take away the car that is being used as a means to break the law, then they would take these cars even if it weren't profitable for the city.