Just an observation, from someone who has no stake in this argument.........
In the time I have spent reading posts on this board, under this name and under others, I have had the opportunity to read many posts from both Crumpp and Wotan on many issues. Several FW 190 threads have come and gone, and I always find both of them to be knowledgable and polite, and almost always have references to back up what they have to say.
I never saw that Crumpp really disagreed with Wotan's post, he merely asked for something more than pilot statements to back it up. A pilot writing that the factory made a change to a series of planes (in this case the F-8 variant), and actual factory specifications stating a change was made are two very different things. I think that is all Crumpp was trying to say.
As for Milo, you need medication. You confused posts from different people, exagerrated statements and then denied responsibility when people were led to obvious conclusions of what you meant to say, resorted to name calling and character attacks when your opponent remained calm and polite, and as a topper have not quoted even one source to back up your statements.
I will not say I have never disagreed with a statement Crumpp has posted about the FW 190. However, I admit that the majority of my "knowledge" is secondhand, and questionable in its origins, while Crumpp almost always has data to back up his statements, often from more than one source. I respect that he takes the time to look up those sources and put them in his post.
Milo, perhaps you should re-read all the posts in this thread by both Crumpp and Wotan. If you still havent learned anything about the topic by the end, maybe you will at least have an idea of how to act like an adult instead of a 12 year old ADD poster-child.
