Author Topic: Commonwealth Boomerang  (Read 4837 times)

Offline Angus

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 10057
Commonwealth Boomerang
« Reply #15 on: December 21, 2004, 12:27:21 PM »
Oh, and if we ever have NIGHT, or a NIGHT zone, there would be a place for the Beau, the Mossie, 110, Ju88 and many many bombers.
HTC would have to model some radar before, but I bet it is nothing they can't do if they choose.

Was flying a sim online with some crude radar on a 486 some 10 years ago...
It was very interesting to carry out the flight trials at Rechlin with the Spitfire and the Hurricane. Both types are very simple to fly compared to our aircraft, and childishly easy to take-off and land. (Werner Mölders)

Offline Vudak

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 4819
Commonwealth Boomerang
« Reply #16 on: June 28, 2006, 01:33:31 AM »
Although HTC has said no new plane development until post-CT makes this an absurd time to bump this, I figured I'd do it anyway :D

It just looks so purdy :) check out those pix, they're still available :aok
Vudak
352nd Fighter Group

Offline Slash27

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 12798
Commonwealth Boomerang
« Reply #17 on: July 06, 2006, 05:24:17 AM »
Quote
Originally posted by Jester
ZERO BAIT - plain and simple.  :rolleyes:



Zero killer:aok

Offline Angus

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 10057
Commonwealth Boomerang
« Reply #18 on: July 07, 2006, 09:39:58 AM »
Boomerang and the I-16 would be interesting
It was very interesting to carry out the flight trials at Rechlin with the Spitfire and the Hurricane. Both types are very simple to fly compared to our aircraft, and childishly easy to take-off and land. (Werner Mölders)

Offline SMIDSY

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1248
Commonwealth Boomerang
« Reply #19 on: July 10, 2006, 08:50:24 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by Jester
ZERO BAIT - plain and simple.  :rolleyes:




BUT ITS SOOO CUTE!!! I WANT TO HUG IT!!



Offline Reynolds

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2031
      • http://flyingknights.csmsites.com
Commonwealth Boomerang
« Reply #20 on: July 11, 2006, 05:40:51 AM »
Quote
Originally posted by SMIDSY
BUT ITS SOOO CUTE!!! I WANT TO HUG IT!!




It is... but that russian I-16 with the ram-jet is cuter!!! But yeah, it seems like a nice plane. Any more pictures?

Offline SMIDSY

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1248
Commonwealth Boomerang
« Reply #21 on: July 11, 2006, 05:58:01 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by Reynolds
It is... but that russian I-16 with the ram-jet is cuter!!! But yeah, it seems like a nice plane. Any more pictures?


why yes!




want some more punk? sure thing!!! QUAH QUAH QUAH!!!!


Offline Simaril

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 5149
Commonwealth Boomerang
« Reply #22 on: July 11, 2006, 08:37:26 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by Vudak
Although HTC has said no new plane development until post-CT makes this an absurd time to bump this, I figured I'd do it anyway :D

It just looks so purdy :) check out those pix, they're still available :aok



Don't worry about the bump, Vudak -- everyone expects a Boomerang to keep coming back......











Maturity is knowing that I've been an idiot in the past.
Wisdom is realizing I will be an idiot in the future.
Common sense is trying to not be an idiot right now

"Social Fads are for sheeple." - Meatwad

Offline Reynolds

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2031
      • http://flyingknights.csmsites.com
Commonwealth Boomerang
« Reply #23 on: July 12, 2006, 12:58:30 AM »
That is a WIERD looking aircraft...

Offline Debonair

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3488
Commonwealth Boomerang
« Reply #24 on: July 12, 2006, 11:33:52 PM »



and some more stubby australians


Offline FTJR

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1996
Commonwealth Boomerang
« Reply #25 on: July 16, 2006, 07:38:28 AM »
Nice Photo's Debonair, of the boomerang as well :)

Just got a book last week, which dealt in some part with the boomerangs. They spent most of their time marking for artillery and fighter/bombers.

They also spent a lot of time trying to avoid being shot down by their Allies.

I am quoting from the book here, one boomerang was set upon by a p38 flown by a well know American ace (not named) and was so badly shot up that he forced landed and got out without a scratch. The aircraft burnt . The 38 driver returned to base, and promptly painted an aussie flag on his victory tally. He was forced to remove it some time later due to some ill will it created .

Soon after all allied aircraft were ordered to paint their tail section white to avoid  such incidences.

60 years removed I can see the funny side, but I guess it wasn't a joking matter in those days.
Bring the Beaufighter to Aces High
Raw Prawns      

B.O.S.S. "Beaufighter Operator Support Services" 
Storms and Aeroplanes dont mix

Offline BaDkaRmA158Th

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2542
Commonwealth Boomerang
« Reply #26 on: July 17, 2006, 07:29:53 AM »
Origin:Comonwealth aircraft Corperation, Austrailia.

Engine:1,200Hp Pratt&Whitney R-1830-S3C4G Twin Wasp 14-Cylinder Two-Row radial.
Dimentions:Span 36Ft 3in (11m); Length 25Ft 6in (7-77m);Height 11Ft 6in (3-5m)
Wights:Empty 5,450Lb  (2474Kg) Loaded 7,600Lb (3450kg)
Performance: Max speed 296Mph (474Km/h) : Service ceiling 29,000Ft (8845m) : Range at 190Mph (304Km/h) 930miles (1490Km)
Armament:Normaly two hispano 20mm and four 0-303in browning machineguns in wings.
History:First flight 29 may 1942; first delivery August 1942; Final deliveries Early 1944.
User's:Austrailia.

All the info i got.

Imageing a slow p40,with 20mm that can turn better than a zeke!
and unlike the zeke,wont tear apart like rice paper.
« Last Edit: July 17, 2006, 07:32:28 AM by BaDkaRmA158Th »
~383Rd RTC/CH BW/AG~
BaDfaRmA

My signature says "Our commitment to diplomacy will never inhibit our willingness to kick a$s."

Offline Iron_Cross

  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 431
Commonwealth Boomerang
« Reply #27 on: July 17, 2006, 12:30:39 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by BaDkaRmA158Th

Imageing a slow p40,with 20mm that can turn better than a zeke!
and unlike the zeke,wont tear apart like rice paper.


Hmmm!!  Sounds good to me, bring it.  We just might have another base defender, or a Vulch Queen in the works for the MA.

Offline Angus

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 10057
Commonwealth Boomerang
« Reply #28 on: July 18, 2006, 03:34:08 AM »
For the PAC the Japanese also need some aircraft to fill in (Oscar and Nate).
That would give new life to Hurry I, P40, F4F, and then call for P38F, P39 and the Boomerang ;)
Same goes with bombers. Betty, Mavis, B25, etc etc.
It was very interesting to carry out the flight trials at Rechlin with the Spitfire and the Hurricane. Both types are very simple to fly compared to our aircraft, and childishly easy to take-off and land. (Werner Mölders)

Offline Col. Flashman

  • Zinc Member
  • *
  • Posts: 58
Commonwealth Boomerang
« Reply #29 on: October 17, 2006, 02:05:48 AM »




COMMONWEALTH BOOMERANG - Single-seat 'stop-gap' fighter initiated late 1941 to make good RAAF's foreseen lack of imported fighters of better performance. Design based on using components of Wirraway trainer, combined with 1,200 hp Pratt & Whitney R-1830-S3C4-G radial engine and two-speed supercharger.
Initial five CA-12 aircraft built early 1942, followed by first production batch of 100 ordered February 1942. First CA-12 flown May 29, 1942, and deliveries began July 1942. Further production comprised 95 CA-13, delivered from August 1943, 49 CA-19, delivered from May 1944, and single CA-14, making total of 250 by early 1945.
Differences between variants minor.
CA-12 Boomerang Mk I; The first single-seat fighter version, 105 built
CA-13 Boomerang Mk II; Improved version of the CA-12, 95 built
CA-14; One aircraft fitted with a turbo-supercharged engine, did not enter production.
CA-14A; The CA-14 prototype was later modified to have a square tail & rudder.
CA-19 Boomarang Mk II; Tactical reconnaissance variant with a single vertical camera in the fuselage, 49 built .
Armament comprised eight 0.303-in (7.7-mm) Browning guns in first five CA-12s, changed to four Brownings with two 20-mm Hispano cannon in production aircraft. CA-13s had metal (instead of fabric) covered ailerons and CA-19s had single F.24 camera in rear fuselage for tac-R role. Single CA-14 had General Electric B-2 turbo-supercharger in rear starboard fuselage side and R-1830-S1C3-G engine;
It first flew on January 13, 1943. Boomerangs entered service at 2 OTU late 1942, and flew operationally with Nos 4 (August 1943 - August 1945), 5 (November 1943 - August 1946), 83 (September 1943 - August 1945), 84 (April 1943 - October 1943) and 85 (May 1943 - January 1945) Sqns. Of these, Nos 4, 5 and 84 saw service against Japanese forces in New Guinea and Borneo; other two squadrons remained in Australia.

Max speed, 305 mph (491 km/h) at 15,500 ft (4,724 m). Cruising speed, 190 mph (305 km/h) at 15,000 ft (4,572 m). Rate of climb, 2,940 ftlmin (14.9 mlsec). Time to 25,000ft (7,620 m), 13.2 min. Service ceiling, 34,000 ft (10,363 m). Range (internal fuel), 930 mis (1,496 km). Range (drop tank), 1,600 mis (2,575 km). Empty weight, 5,373 Ib (2,437kg). Gross weight, 7,699 Ib (3,492 kg). Max overload, 8,249 Ib (3,742 kg). Span, 36 ft 0 in (10.97 m). Length, 25 ft 6 in (7.77 m). Wing area, 225 sqfi (20.90 m2).

History of the 27 year Restoration of the Boomer "Suzy-Q".
http://boomerang-flight.com/

Air Show Pix of the Restored "Milingimbi Ghost".
http://www.kiwiaircraftimages.com/boomer.html
http://www.classicfighters.co.nz/ac/boomerang/index.shtml

History of All Production Boomerrangs
http://www.adf-serials.com/2a46.shtml

Details of the Inner Workings of a Boomer.
http://www.clubhyper.com/reference/ca12bg_1.htm

Chart on Performance Capabilities of the Boomer
http://uncleted.jinak.cz/pdf/ca12.pdf