Originally posted by rshubert
I'll keep it short and simple, Anton.
If the "concensus" were against hordes, there wouldn't BE ANY HORDES due to a lack of members. Get it? The threads are all started by a minority that thinks they have a monopoly on what constitutes successful gameplay.
Come on into the MA, and watch. You will see what I mean. The real concensus is that concentration of force (what the experten are calling hordes) is the way to capture territory. Some of us play that game, and enjoy it. Obviously, enough to create the dreaded "hordes" some people object to so strongly.
Personally, and I have posted it many times, I think the cooperative tactics and concentration of force make for a more enjoyable experience. I HATE getting gang-raped by two or four enemy planes when I fly around alone. I almost never go plane hunting by myself, since even the experten run for the ack or a friend when they are disadvantaged in a fight. And I think fighting at 1000 feet alt is silly, unrealistic, and counterproductive.
This may come as a shock to you shubie, so brace yourself. Many people have been coming here (for years) to engage in simulated dogfights. The bases were just somthing to fight ABOUT.
Unfortunately I have to say you are correct, the horde is the majority. It boggles my mind that they find capturing undefended bases entertaining. But night after night, month after month, the majority heads to the nearest undefended tool shed, and opens fire!
Maybe we need an arena designed to cater to the hordes. It could have a valley of neutral bases, and a outside perimeter of high bases for the masses to lift off from. Then the object would be to capture as many bases as possible. When the last neutral base is captured, the country with the most abso*****lutely useless bases, WINS!!!!!!!
WHOOPPEEEEEE that sounds like some fun don't it???