Originally posted by Gixer
The question was/is that Iraq was invaded for WMD's which has all proven to be false, not that Sadam was a bad man. What makes you so sure that the situation for Iraqis today and in the future will be any better?
...-Gixer
Gixer, why do you think that the WMD (as 'casus belli') were not in Iraq's possession when the USA started the war? Is this because those WMD have not been found until now?
As far as I remember, not all of the WMD (in the amounts existence of which was accepted by Iraq itself) were attested for. Nor were there enough official Iraqi documentation presented to the United Nations about the liquidation of those amounts of the WMD. This can be easily construed as the 'casus belli', especially if one takes into account the well-founded scare in Israel (strategic ally of the USA) of the Iraqi WMD attack, and special intrests in Iraq's oil.
All that said, you can't speak about "WMD's which has all proven to be false".
Iraq has several big lakes, two big rivers confluense of which ends up in marshy delta, and maritime border line in the Persian Gulf.
As a philologist with military background, I can envisage the realization of the popular Russian saying 'kontsy v vodu' ('the ends - into the water'). This ends my post here.
