« previous next »
Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 5 6 ... 10   Go Down

Author Topic: US Gives Up On Search For WMD's  (Read 4312 times)

Offline AKS\/\/ulfe

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 4287
US Gives Up On Search For WMD's
« Reply #30 on: January 13, 2005, 10:26:51 AM »
One thing was proven. If they existed, they are still out there waiting to be used.
-SW
Logged

Offline Momus--

  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 651
US Gives Up On Search For WMD's
« Reply #31 on: January 13, 2005, 10:38:38 AM »
Quote
Originally posted by AKS\/\/ulfe
One thing was proven. If they existed, they are still out there waiting to be used.
-SW


Exactly. One of the rationales given for the war was that the risk of some nasty Bio/Chem wepaons being given by the ebil Saddam to the equally nefarious Bin Laden was so great. Yet now Iraq has been turned into a magnet for every Jihadi who wants to earn his one way trip to paradise in the very location where these alleged stocks of WMD are still unaccounted for. Thus the very circumstances the war was ostensibly started to counter have in fact been created.  Doh!

Of course that assumes that one believes said WMD existed in any significant quantity after the mid 1990's. Since Bush, Cheney et al seemed to believe so, you'd think they'd be prosecuting a continued search with a little more vigour. Wouldn't you?
Logged

Offline Staga

  • Parolee
  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 5334
      • http://www.nohomersclub.com/
US Gives Up On Search For WMD's
« Reply #32 on: January 13, 2005, 10:54:18 AM »
De Nile is not a river in Egypt :)
Logged

Offline Red Tail 444

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2497
      • http://www.redtail.org
US Gives Up On Search For WMD's
« Reply #33 on: January 13, 2005, 02:40:00 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by john9001
nothing was "proved", just because they did not find WMD does not mean they are not there,buried in the desert/moved to syria.



x:confused:

Re-reading....

:lol

re-reading....

:rofl

Oh, where do I start with this one....Should we contact Fox Muldr on this? Maybe they were buried in the desert AND moved to Syria?

or, Buried deep in the desert in Syria? I get it now. Gotta go, I think I'm gonna call the police on my neighbor, and tell them that he was dealing crack, and even though it's no longer there, I believe he buried it deep in his backyard, and moved it to Green Bay.

Yeah, THAT will go over real well...










handsomehunk
Logged

Offline Glas

  • Copper Member
  • **
  • Posts: 197
US Gives Up On Search For WMD's
« Reply #34 on: January 13, 2005, 02:46:25 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by JB42
Anyone consider that all those months we tried to go through the UN to get in to Iraq, Saddam didn't have every train, truck, car and camel shipping WMD's out of Iraq before the invasion took place?


I wish people would stop perpetuating the myth that there were any there in the first place.

Colin Powell and Condoleeza Rice both said prior to 9/11 that the sanctions against Iraq had worked and they had no significant weapons capability.

That is two of the most senior people in the US administration admitting there were none to begin with!!

You were lied to.  You'll get over it some day.
Logged

Offline wombatt

  • Parolee
  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1016
US Gives Up On Search For WMD's
« Reply #35 on: January 13, 2005, 02:51:33 PM »
I have a hard time finding every single little terd in my cats sand box.

Now think how hard it would be to find something in that sand box.
Logged

Offline lada

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1810
US Gives Up On Search For WMD's
« Reply #36 on: January 13, 2005, 02:54:52 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by john9001
nothing was "proved", just because they did not find WMD does not mean they are not there,buried in the desert/moved to syria.


IMAO every little child know that all Iraqi nukes were moved to Iran ... you dumb.




Lets see few facts..
Bush claimed that iraq have WMD (deployable in 45 mins).
Bush claimed that Iraq is cooperating with Al-quaida.

Then he went to the US`s congress.... he convinced all those sheeps.. ohh sorry i mean congresman, that Iraq is great danger for world piece. So so so ... all those noble man gave him some mickey mouse money and he started to play.......

Baisicaly all so called evidence were suplied by CIA ( or am i wrong?)

Later on Bush invade Iraq, kill some 10 000 civilist, cause dead of few thousand US citizens.......
Then they found mobile laboratories... OMG it were not chemical laboratories, it were some meteorological stations... dooooh....
OMG Iraq didnt buy Uranium from Nigeria ?... it can not be !!!
Hollyyy... watermelon there is no evidence that SH were linked to Al-quaida as CIA belived.?!

Ohhh and those WMD..... there are not even WMD...  

So regardless what could SH do in future lets make it short.

If you will go to the american congress with paper from CIA.... and if you will demand $999999999+E6 because pink elephant is about to terrorise colony of foxs close to  the canadian border, they will simply give you permision to vulch Uganda. [then you only need to explain people that pink elephant is great danger for american home cats and thats it.. no... you must ask god to bless kitecat facotries in US]

In the other words.... Do you realize, what credit do you have in the world now ?
Words like 'CIA' or 'secret services' gave people more laugh that british 'Halo Halo'

But you are to cool to care about it, so i will just finish my cookies.
Logged

Offline Octavius

  • Skinner Team
  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 6651
Re: Re: Re: US Gives Up On Search For WMD's
« Reply #37 on: January 13, 2005, 03:14:30 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by Thrawn
"Probability is in favor of the situation developing for the better.

Pre action = very little chance of change

Post action = very large chance of change."


That doesn't follow.  A very large chance of change doesn't necessarily precipitate a change for the better.


Ya think?  

Should a situation remain completely stagnant, there is zero chance for the better.  Should a situation fluctuate, it has a greater chance for the better.  

That's entirely subjective though.  Throw the pre-war situation at "50%, just ok" then we have an equal chance of better or worse change.
Logged
octavius
Fat Drunk BasTards (forum)
"bastard coated bastards with bastard filling?  delicious!"
Guest of the ++Blue Knights++[/size]

Offline john9001

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 9453
US Gives Up On Search For WMD's
« Reply #38 on: January 13, 2005, 03:14:50 PM »
they found migs buried in the desert after a sand storm exposed them, the "meteorological stations" were also buried in the desert.

so you think that if saddam would go to all the trouble to bury migs and "meteorological stations" in the desert he would not bury WMD?

de-nile is right.
Logged

Offline Sandman

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 17620
US Gives Up On Search For WMD's
« Reply #39 on: January 13, 2005, 03:21:13 PM »
Hmmm... maybe because the MiGs were ineffective against the U.S., but might be useful once our attention turned somewhere else.

I don't think a few MiG-25s are comparable to a WMD capability.
Logged
sand

Offline lada

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1810
US Gives Up On Search For WMD's
« Reply #40 on: January 13, 2005, 03:24:51 PM »
LOL imao would you be so kind and post some of those burried mobile meteorogical laboratories links ?

yeah .. i spoted Migs in the desert.... hmmm they were w/o wings and from cold war era

Man you have big fantasy...
« Last Edit: January 13, 2005, 03:27:01 PM by lada »
Logged

Offline Red Tail 444

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2497
      • http://www.redtail.org
US Gives Up On Search For WMD's
« Reply #41 on: January 13, 2005, 03:34:58 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by Sandman
Hmmm... maybe because the MiGs were ineffective against the U.S., but might be useful once our attention turned somewhere else.

I don't think a few MiG-25s are comparable to a WMD capability.


Yes they are, so...neeener   neeener  neeener:lol

SH filled the fuel tanks w/ WMD, THEN buried them in the Mig25's...and moved them.......to Syria...
Logged

Offline lada

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1810
US Gives Up On Search For WMD's
« Reply #42 on: January 13, 2005, 05:05:39 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by Red Tail 444


SH filled the fuel tanks w/ WMD, THEN buried them in the Mig25's...and moved them.......to Syria...

naaa no Syria Iran Iran ... looks even today we were laughing at home, coz some Emreekaan expert pointed on some satelite picture and said ... iranian could hide Nuke bombs under this rock... coz its big enuf ....

But i accept that Syria could get some part of those WMD... why not... everybody know that SH had plenty of them
Logged

Offline Staga

  • Parolee
  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 5334
      • http://www.nohomersclub.com/
US Gives Up On Search For WMD's
« Reply #43 on: January 13, 2005, 05:41:26 PM »
I have a WMD in my pants; it's a real bringer of the death, destroyer of the worlds and makes girls cry and ask for more :)
Logged

Offline Elfie

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 6143
Re: US Gives Up On Search For WMD's
« Reply #44 on: January 13, 2005, 06:36:25 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by Gixer
Yet Bush still can't admit he was wrong on the fundemental reason for his invasion of Iraq and the subsequent mess it's in today.


What a joke.



....-Gixer


Not once were we ever told that WMD was the only reason for going into Iraq. The list of reaons for going into Iraq has been documented numerous times on this board, not our fault you choose to ignore every reason EXCEPT wmd. It has also been documented that some of Iraq's stockpiles of WMD were NEVER accounted for. Iraq also had a stockpile of uranium, several hundred tons iirc.
Logged
Corkyjr on country jumping:
In the end you should be thankful for those players like us who switch to try and help keep things even because our willingness to do so, helps a more selfish, I want it my way player, get to fly his latewar uber ride.
Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 5 6 ... 10   Go Up
« previous next »