Author Topic: Invasion of Crete: A disaster or a succes  (Read 390 times)

Offline patrone

  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 608
Invasion of Crete: A disaster or a succes
« on: January 21, 2005, 11:49:19 PM »
Just Finish reading this Book about the German Airborn Invasion of Crete. Everywhere have I heard how big disaster this was to the Germans. But is that really true?

I consider it to be a great succes.

What do you guys think?

Offline genozaur

  • Parolee
  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 562
Invasion of Crete: A disaster or a succes
« Reply #1 on: January 22, 2005, 12:49:02 AM »
Crete was a huge tactical success for the Axis.
But it was not followed (or preceded) with the seizure of Malta. And that became a prelude to disaster.

Offline patrone

  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 608
Invasion of Crete: A disaster or a succes
« Reply #2 on: January 22, 2005, 01:04:03 AM »
Quote
Originally posted by genozaur
Crete was a huge tactical success for the Axis.
But it was not followed (or preceded) with the seizure of Malta. And that became a prelude to disaster.



I agree with you. Yet Hitler abandond the Parachute option, for the rest of the war. This must have been an accomplishment for the Allies? Imagine Parachutes in Ardennes or in Stalingrad?
(maybe not stalingrad, its a to complicated story)

Offline genozaur

  • Parolee
  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 562
Invasion of Crete: A disaster or a succes
« Reply #3 on: January 22, 2005, 01:48:32 AM »
Quote
Originally posted by patrone
I agree with you. Yet Hitler abandond the Parachute option, for the rest of the war. This must have been an accomplishment for the Allies? Imagine Parachutes in Ardennes or in Stalingrad?
(maybe not stalingrad, its a to complicated story)


The strange thing is that the 'parashutists' scare in the high echelons of the Red Army in the summer of 1941 allowed the Germans to capture the Crimean peninsular, a landmass aircraft-carrier.
The Soviet divisions in the Crimea were dispersed
in order to be ready to fend off the enemy marine AND PARACHUTE landings, with the unsufficient force left at Perekop (landstrip "bottleneck" connecting the peninsular to the mainland). So the Manstein army broke through Perekop (which still was not easy).
Urgent reinforcements, including the Primorskaya Army (evacuated from Odessa) under general Petrov, started to arrive too late and had no choice but withdrew to Sevastopol and Kerch region of the Crimea.

The 'abandonement' of PARACUTE after heavy losses on Crete was just one more of multiple mistakes of Der Fuhrer.    
:D

Offline patrone

  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 608
Invasion of Crete: A disaster or a succes
« Reply #4 on: January 22, 2005, 01:56:48 AM »
I can not more then agree.

But how the English defence of Crete could fail so fataly as it did, I can not really understand. They knew all about it,  when it was going to launch, even where they where landing. They had 4 times as big force. Tanks, cars, trucks.....they lacked but one thing............. Airsupport

Offline genozaur

  • Parolee
  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 562
Invasion of Crete: A disaster or a succes
« Reply #5 on: January 22, 2005, 02:25:50 AM »
Quote
Originally posted by patrone
I can not more then agree.

But how the English defence of Crete could fail so fataly as it did, I can not really understand. They knew all about it,  when it was going to launch, even where they where landing. They had 4 times as big force. Tanks, cars, trucks.....they lacked but one thing............. Airsupport


Patrone, search info about "The Art of Winning" by the Russian generalissimo Aleksandr (Alexander) Suvorov. You'll find the answer there.

Offline patrone

  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 608
Invasion of Crete: A disaster or a succes
« Reply #6 on: January 22, 2005, 02:33:54 AM »
Sovarov....lol, like "duck sovarov", sovarov? Think it is a pot with peices of duck covered with dough placed in a oven left to bake for 20 min.....

Just kidding, The guy at Stalingrad or one of the guys?

Offline Gixer

  • Persona Non Grata
  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3189
Invasion of Crete: A disaster or a succes
« Reply #7 on: January 22, 2005, 03:05:24 AM »
Quote
Originally posted by patrone
I can not more then agree.

But how the English defence of Crete could fail so fataly as it did, I can not really understand. They knew all about it,  when it was going to launch, even where they where landing. They had 4 times as big force. Tanks, cars, trucks.....they lacked but one thing............. Airsupport


And the Jerry Can, not having a simple  effective container for fuel during the North Africa campaign was a big problem for the Brits. They lost endless amounts of fuel and time because of it and scavanged the "Jerry Cans" when and where ever they could.

It's always the little things.



....-Gixer

Offline Wotan

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 7201
Invasion of Crete: A disaster or a succes
« Reply #8 on: January 22, 2005, 06:54:36 AM »
Freyberg was overly cautious.

There's speculation that he (according to Freyberg's son) was given verbal instructions to not act completely in accordance with intelligence. I doubt this because after being expelled from Greece and the course of the war so far a victory over the Germans in Crete would have made for great propaganda and a morale boost. From post war released 'ultra messages' it seems they Brits knew all about the invasion of Crete.

Check this thread

Ultra Messages Sent to Crete Before the Battle

Some of the problems the Germans ran into had to do with some paras being dropped too high or getting scattered. For instance, Fallshirm-Jäger-Regiment 3  ended up widely scattered to form effective battle groups and were nearly all killed before they reached the ground.

They had dropped in an area of the countryside containing as many as 15,000 men of the 10th New Zealand Brigade.

Also the Germans lacked suitable transports. After the initial waves of gliders and paras the intention was to re-enforce them with seaborne troops. These mostly consisted of commandeered vessels called 'caiques' (fishing boats dependent on a sail and a small auxiliary engine).

As plans were adapted to the new situation these re-enforcements were delayed and had a best speed of 7 knots. This gave the Royal Navy time to hunt these boats down and sink many, the rest were re-called.

But whatever losses the Germans suffered it was worth it for the to take Crete.

 For the Germans, the island of Crete would provide forward base to conduct offensive air and naval operations and to support the ground offensive in Egypt.  

Taking Crete would deny the Allies airfields closer to the Ploesti oil fields in Romania.

The Germans averted a real 'disaster' only because of the poor command and show of the commonwealth forces defending Crete. They made one critical mistake after another.

Offline Angus

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 10057
Invasion of Crete: A disaster or a succes
« Reply #9 on: January 22, 2005, 07:37:23 AM »
Crete was a bold move and succeded, - well it was a Phyrric victory.
Axis would have needed Malta as well, but it never got that far.

Although, it was a tad close.
It was very interesting to carry out the flight trials at Rechlin with the Spitfire and the Hurricane. Both types are very simple to fly compared to our aircraft, and childishly easy to take-off and land. (Werner Mölders)

Offline Otto

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1566
      • http://www.cris.com/~ziggy2/
Invasion of Crete: A disaster or a succes
« Reply #10 on: January 22, 2005, 07:43:33 AM »
Crete...!?   I thought it was going to be Iran...  I better check the News...

Offline lazs2

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 24886
Invasion of Crete: A disaster or a succes
« Reply #11 on: January 22, 2005, 09:36:20 AM »
wouldn't hitler have had to have airplanes to drop em out of?   Seems he didn't have a lot to spare.

lazs

Offline genozaur

  • Parolee
  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 562
Invasion of Crete: A disaster or a succes
« Reply #12 on: January 23, 2005, 03:41:20 AM »
Quote
Originally posted by patrone
Sovarov....lol, like "duck sovarov", sovarov? Think it is a pot with peices of duck covered with dough placed in a oven left to bake for 20 min.....

Just kidding, The guy at Stalingrad or one of the guys?


The guy who drove Napoleon's generals out of the Northern Italy.

Offline genozaur

  • Parolee
  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 562
Invasion of Crete: A disaster or a succes
« Reply #13 on: January 24, 2005, 01:12:12 AM »
Quote
Originally posted by genozaur
The strange thing is that the 'parashutists' scare in the high echelons of the Red Army in the summer of 1941 allowed the Germans to capture the Crimean peninsular, a landmass aircraft-carrier.
The Soviet divisions in the Crimea were dispersed
in order to be ready to fend off the enemy marine AND PARACHUTE landings, with the unsufficient force left at Perekop (landstrip "bottleneck" connecting the peninsular to the mainland). So the Manstein army broke through Perekop (which still was not easy).
Urgent reinforcements, including the Primorskaya Army (evacuated from Odessa) under general Petrov, started to arrive too late and had no choice but withdrew to Sevastopol and Kerch region of the Crimea.

The 'abandonement' of PARACUTE after heavy losses on Crete was just one more of multiple mistakes of Der Fuhrer.    
:D


In the addition to the above-said I can say that
the MERCUR operation (capture of Crete) was a tactical Nazist success which had strategic influence on the initial success of the operation BARBAROSSA. Mercur paved the way for the capture of the Crimea ('landmass aircraft- carrier') by the German army under the command of Manstein, thus allowing the Germans to most effectively provide the air support for their ground operations in the Caucasus.