Author Topic: MP3 Players (Read 685 times)

NUKE · « **Reply #15 on:** January 25, 2005, 12:43:44 AM »

Nash, think of the player as a signal processor. The .cda file has to be converted and eventually end up as an analog signal......and the software is the signal processor, along with your sound card.

The software and the sound card are going to color that signal.

rpm · « **Reply #16 on:** January 25, 2005, 12:50:14 AM »

Did'nt we have a discussion on alternatives to Real and some other media players the other night? I seem to recall a player called UnReal or something that has none of the side effects of RealPlayer.

Masherbrum · « **Reply #17 on:** January 25, 2005, 09:32:14 AM »

LMAO. You guys are bi^&hing more than the guys in my Home Theater forum. Keep it up please.

All Winamps are resource hogs. Take your pick, they all suck. It has more to do with your SPEAKERS than the programs.

Karaya

Estes · « **Reply #18 on:** January 25, 2005, 09:37:10 AM »

Quote

Originally posted by JB88
i use either i-tunes, or musicmatch.

they both sound pretty decent to me...but then i am not overly gifted in the dumbo department.

I use Musicmatch as well. not the basic, I bought the pro and all future upgrades a long time ago.

Sounds really good to me, but I have high quality speakers. And I never cared for Winamp.

Saintaw · « **Reply #19 on:** January 25, 2005, 09:47:20 AM »

I'm using mediamonkey for the features, but for the plain sound, I use Media player lite (find it on sourceforge). i think it comes in the rawest form possible.

lada · « **Reply #20 on:** January 25, 2005, 09:53:20 AM »

Quote

Originally posted by Saintaw
I'm using mediamonkey

monkey monkey monkey

Im using winamp in evil OS and Xmms at Godlike OS.... btw im sitting in front of the computer with Evil Os right now and winamp is running about 5 hours and it still take only 2.3 Mb of memorry....

Whitch of your resources has been consumed by winamp ?

Masherbrum · « **Reply #21 on:** January 25, 2005, 10:10:37 AM »

lada, Winamp uses more memory than Media Player. Google the chit, I don't have time to argue with you whilst you continually edit your 3 sentence posts.

What's funny about this whole thing is it's a program, it WON'T color the sound, it isn't a Receiver. The two cannot be compared. This is between the file played to the end result out of the speakers. Bottom line. If some use the EQ, they ARE coloring the sound.

Karaya

Masherbrum · « **Reply #22 on:** January 25, 2005, 10:12:55 AM »

Btw, I used to fly AH with Winamp going at all times. AH ran like chit, switched to Media Player on a recommendation, AH ran smoother. Windows Media Players runs smoother in the background than Winamp on it's best day.

Karaya

JB73 · « **Reply #23 on:** January 25, 2005, 10:36:20 AM »

i still use winamp 2.81

have not found a better, cleaner interface (which is most important to me) i hate gaudy bubbly looking windoze media player. i refuse to have anything the with the word "real" on my PC. quicktime sucks, and can't manage playlists at all.

btw this is the skin i use, though i darkened up the fonst, and the backlight in the playlist editor

lada · « **Reply #24 on:** January 25, 2005, 12:18:56 PM »

Quote

Originally posted by Masherbrum
lada, Winamp uses more memory than Media Player. Google the chit, I don't have time to argue with you whilst you continually edit your 3 sentence posts.

lol Karaya you better stop talking BS, coz you have no clue.

memory consumtion by winamp and wmplayer on the top

wmplayer after 40 seconds of running on the top

Both of them minimized, playing from the same source

Both played same URL.

Since 5Mb is < that 9 Mb
2M are < that 7 Mb

Are you drunk or what ?

edit: yeah sorry i had to correct aoubt->about & at->in

but for sure it makes me a terrorist and i made those pictures in photoshop

you better do not use google nor computer at all... and if you dont belive me, just google that watermelon

lada · « **Reply #25 on:** January 25, 2005, 12:22:50 PM »

Quote

Originally posted by Masherbrum
Btw, I used to fly AH with Winamp going at all times. AH ran like chit, switched to Media Player on a recommendation, AH ran smoother. Windows Media Players runs smoother in the background than Winamp on it's best day.

Karaya

well this is another brain related matter.

Baaaaaaa baaaaa baaaa this program doesnt work ... muuummmyyyyyy baaaaaa.

its broken ! bloody programmers.... what a POS....

Ahhh... there are some settings... ummmmm ... i better uninstall it, coz i already claimed it BS.. .... yeah .. damm im soo good and those programmers are sutch dweebs

SOB · « **Reply #26 on:** January 25, 2005, 03:02:44 PM »

It is also going to matter quite a bit what version you are using. Winamp 2.xx or Winamp 5.xx. Version 5.xx uses a hell of a lot more memory than 2.xx does.

lada · « **Reply #27 on:** January 25, 2005, 03:09:17 PM »

Winamp 5.0.1 lite or something like that.

Masherbrum · « **Reply #28 on:** January 25, 2005, 11:01:28 PM »

Quote

Originally posted by SOB
It is also going to matter quite a bit what version you are using. Winamp 2.xx or Winamp 5.xx. Version 5.xx uses a hell of a lot more memory than 2.xx does.

2.95?

Karaya

JB73 · « **Reply #29 on:** January 25, 2005, 11:35:11 PM »

Quote

Originally posted by Masherbrum
2.95?

Karaya

go back to 2.81

i can email it if you need.....

most basic and clean version i have found