Author Topic: Bf 109F-4 performance research page  (Read 4024 times)

Offline Kweassa

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 6425
Bf 109F-4 performance research page
« Reply #60 on: February 10, 2005, 08:34:52 PM »
So we're gonna have to fight SpitVs with +16 boost with F-4 using 1.30 ata?

 God help us!

Offline GRUNHERZ

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 13413
Bf 109F-4 performance research page
« Reply #61 on: February 10, 2005, 09:19:33 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by Wmaker
For example in finnish 109s the use of the WEP (1.42ata setting)was prevented at least in two different ways. One was wire to prevent the throttle quardant's movement and the other was this bolt which was fastened on a bent metal plate which attached in the throttle quardant.

Before the power settings were cleared for use LW used same kind of methods to prevent the pilots from over boosting the engine.

So, at a point in time with certain engines and certain planes there were no WEP. Sure you can find take off and emergency settings listed in books but that doesn't mean they were always available because of engine problems.

When I moved the throttle I could bent it sightly and move it past the bolt to full throttle. And of course wire can be broken. So there were ways to go past these but if the engines weren't able to handle these settings the results weren't pleasant.



I most definately would like to see so called early an late sub-variants for many planes we have in AH. IMO that would be the best way to handle this problem of differing boost pressures at different times during the war. Would be great for events and wouldn't require any new art work either. But until HTC makes a decision to implement variants like these I like the primary adversaries' performances to match.


Finland never used Bf109F.

Offline Angus

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 10057
Bf 109F-4 performance research page
« Reply #62 on: February 11, 2005, 03:29:08 AM »
"So we're gonna have to fight SpitVs with +16 boost with F-4 using 1.30 ata?

God help us!"

Hehe, just pray if there will be a boosted up Merlin 66/70 Spit.
It was very interesting to carry out the flight trials at Rechlin with the Spitfire and the Hurricane. Both types are very simple to fly compared to our aircraft, and childishly easy to take-off and land. (Werner Mölders)

Offline Wmaker

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 5743
      • Lentolaivue 34 website
Bf 109F-4 performance research page
« Reply #63 on: February 11, 2005, 07:53:54 AM »
Quote
Originally posted by GRUNHERZ
Finland never used Bf109F.


And?
Wmaker
Lentolaivue 34

Thank you for the Brewster HTC!

Offline Angus

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 10057
Bf 109F-4 performance research page
« Reply #64 on: February 11, 2005, 08:47:09 AM »
Finland had the 109G :D
It was very interesting to carry out the flight trials at Rechlin with the Spitfire and the Hurricane. Both types are very simple to fly compared to our aircraft, and childishly easy to take-off and land. (Werner Mölders)

Offline Angus

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 10057
Bf 109F-4 performance research page
« Reply #65 on: February 11, 2005, 08:48:11 AM »
And, might I add, there, exactly THERE, the 109 achieved their finest record.
The Fins knew their stuff ;)
It was very interesting to carry out the flight trials at Rechlin with the Spitfire and the Hurricane. Both types are very simple to fly compared to our aircraft, and childishly easy to take-off and land. (Werner Mölders)

Offline HoHun

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2182
Bf 109F-4 performance research page
« Reply #66 on: February 11, 2005, 01:34:44 PM »
Hi Kweassa,

>So we're gonna have to fight SpitVs with +16 boost with F-4 using 1.30 ata?

Well, I reckon the +16 lbs/sqin Spitfire V should be competitive below 4 km with a small speed advantage near the ground. Above 4 km, the 1.30 ata Messerschmitt would be clearly superior though.

Regards,

Henning (HoHun)