What are are choices with N Korea?

[WhiteHawk]

Do we allow them to accumulate nukes?  Do we bend over backwards to bribe them not to develope nukes?  Or do we attack them and make sure they dont have nukes?

[lada]

muheee... why should you do something about NK ? There are much more important places like Syria and Iran.

Forget NK, it doesnt suit to your economical interests.


Did you hear any single word about NK in Bush's last speach ?

[Staga]

Well US attacked against Iraq because alleged WMDs; I can't see any reason how they couldn't attack against NK now that they have even admitted they have WMDs and they're also a real threat to US.

I know that will be the campaign even Yeager and other nutcases in this board support wholeheartedly

[WhiteHawk]

Originally posted by lada
muheee... why should you do something about NK ? There are much more important places like Syria and Iran.

Forget NK, it doesnt suit to your economical interests.


Did you hear any single word about NK in last Bush's speach ?

No, not in his last speech, but , remeber the 'axis of evil'speech?  I didnt hear any speech by Bush that brought down the tensions that that speech created?  Didi you?

  but the question still remains.  If we allow NK to accumulate Nukes, we will be unable to deal with them in any fashoin, especially if they are hell bent on building suitcase nukes that can easily be smugled into other countries.
   I dont know that they are, but how stupid is it to try to butt heads with the US nukes trying to launch them conventionally?
  They would certainly try to smuggle them into the US (or its allies) cities for an 'ace up the sleeve'.

[WhiteHawk]

Originally posted by Staga
Well US attacked against Iraq because alleged WMDs; I can't see any reason how they couldn't attack against NK now that they have even admitted they have WMDs and they're also a real threat to US.

I know that will be the campaign even Yeager and other nutcases in this board support wholeheartedly

I agree staga, war with NK could be averted easily, as could the iraq war, but that damm 'axis of evil' speech still botheres the hell out of me.

[lada]

Originally posted by WhiteHawk
but that damm 'axis of evil' speech still botheres the hell out of me.

Then speech were effective.

Did you hear Kim Chong Il's speach about Nukes ?

[Jackal1]

Originally posted by WhiteHawk
Do we allow them to accumulate nukes?  Do we bend over backwards to bribe them not to develope nukes?  Or do we attack them and make sure they dont have nukes?

  Well I think the satellite photos that have been being posted evrywhere in the media of the facility might give ya a hint.
  I`m pretty sure it is intended to do so for NK.
 

[ygsmilo]

China will take care of the NK's.

With NK getting nukes, the Japanese will now have to have nukes, the Chinese will not allow the Japanese to have nukes. The thought of Japanese nationalism must give the cronies in China a bad case of Deja Vu.    Look how much China trades with SK, do you think they want a ready market for their goods to vanish?

Look for a political change in NK from within the next year via the hammer or the feather.

[john9001]

NK is no problem, clinton got them to sign a paper promising peace in our time.

[DREDIOCK]

Originally posted by ygsmilo
China will take care of the NK's.

With NK getting nukes, the Japanese will now have to have nukes, the Chinese will not allow the Japanese to have nukes. The thought of Japanese nationalism must give the cronies in China a bad case of Deja Vu.    Look how much China trades with SK, do you think they want a ready market for their goods to vanish?

Look for a political change in NK from within the next year via the hammer or the feather.

I agree with this.
China is the best one to deal with NK.
Its not in the best interests of China for NK to be nuclear capable.

[Jackal1]

Originally posted by john9001
NK is no problem, clinton got them to sign a paper promising peace in our time.

[Reschke]

Well the choices are simple. Option A: Special ops activity targeting high value military and civilian targets including government leaders. Option B: US Navy attack subs hunting down the NK sub navy and then launching nuke tipped tomahawks Option C: US Navy missle boats opening up their launch tubes for some ICBM love on the NK territoy.

All of these are just the beginning the end of man as we know it.

[Staga]

Originally posted by Reschke
Well the choices are simple. Option A: Special ops activity targeting high value military and civilian targets including government leaders. Option B: US Navy attack subs hunting down the NK sub navy and then launching nuke tipped tomahawks Option C: US Navy missle boats opening up their launch tubes for some ICBM love on the NK territoy.

All of these are just the beginning the end of man as we know it.

You forgot ground attack from South Korea; it worked in Iraq so it should work in NK too.

It's kinda funny to see how GWB reacts to that threat; he has been quite adamant when talking about WMDs and now it's time to either put up or shut up.
Are you guys ready to be drafted?

[NUKE]

NK already had nukes. The estimates are between two and up to two dozen.

[Staga]

Originally posted by NUKE
NK already had nukes. The estimates are between two and up to two dozen.

And? IIRC also Iraq had WMDs ?