Originally posted by lazs2
beet... if say... all black people or all white people used only guns to commit murder or never used em... I am sure that would be called out... what the study shows is that 55% of homicides are commited with firearms. Are you saying that some races probly don't follow the 66% rule? My guess is that if anything... the minorities use firearms a little more often but not enough to matter.
I'm quoting the FBI sources. For 2003, the last year for which fully compiled stats are available, it is stated that there were 14,408 homicides, of which 9,638 were committed with firearms. Of those 9,638 homicides, a handgun was used in 7,701 cases. So the percentage of firearms homicides is much higher than 55% - more like 67%. These stats are available in the homicide by weapon type .XLS spreadsheet. What's this 66% rule you spoke of?
In another FBI spreadsheet, murders are analysed by age/race/sex of offender. Interestingly, the number of offenders far exceeds the number of victims, so I can only male-donkey-ume that in many homicides, several people are convicted of the same crime.
Of the 16,043 offenders, 5132 were
known to be white. I suspect that it is this figure that you focus on when assessing the number of homicides by white offenders. However, the race of 4,874 of the offenders (more than 30%) is listed as "unknown". What I am saying, and what Nashwan has said in the past, is that it's highly unlikely that all of those 4,874 unknowns are black, or white. By
extrapolation, we could guess that about 2,400 are blacks, and about the same are white, but this male-donkey-umption is based only on the ethnic distribution of
known offenders. So your white homicide crime assessment needs to take account of this, in which case the number of white offenders far exceeds 5132 and is probably closer to 7,500.