Author Topic: Bowling for Columbine on C4 at 11:05 tonight. (five star rating) (Read 1974 times)

Steve · « **Reply #60 on:** February 21, 2005, 05:43:09 PM »

Quote

I'm socially liberal, but fiscally conservative.

Kind of a tight rope act isn't it? I'm not saying it can't be done (I dunno)but don't the two sometimes clash?

Nash · « **Reply #61 on:** February 21, 2005, 05:45:33 PM »

Quote

Originally posted by Steve
Kind of a tight rope act isn't it? I'm not saying it can't be done (I dunno)but don't the two sometimes clash?

The two sometimes clash? Try the one sometimes clashes.

Conservatives are spending like kids in a candy store.

"Fiscal conservative" has a whole new meaning now... and it aint exactly flattering.

Sandman · « **Reply #62 on:** February 21, 2005, 05:46:21 PM »

Quote

Originally posted by Steve
Kind of a tight rope act isn't it? I'm not saying it can't be done (I dunno)but don't the two sometimes clash?

It's easier than you think.

Otto · « **Reply #63 on:** February 21, 2005, 05:46:32 PM »

This is the film Moore should have made.

Super Size....

JB88 · « **Reply #64 on:** February 21, 2005, 05:49:07 PM »

Quote

Originally posted by Nash

Conservatives are spending like kids in a candy store.

"Fiscal conservative" has a whole new meaning now... and it aint exactly flattering.

odd how that works isnt it.

oh, and that the republicans are all for less government.

hey, i got an idea, rather than giving people back thier money, lets create another government beuracracy to handle it. then lets blow all sorts of cash on foreign wars to jack up the profits of our oil business.

ya. wtg republicons.

midnight Target · « **Reply #65 on:** February 21, 2005, 05:49:22 PM »

Quote

Originally posted by Steve
You are mistaken. I could care less what people do w/ Oscars.
I've seem one, it would make a good paper weight. Many films interest me but I could care less about the film industry and who gets what kudos. Did Moore win an oscar? I couldn't tell you.

LOL

JB88 · « **Reply #66 on:** February 21, 2005, 05:51:25 PM »

Steve · « **Reply #67 on:** February 21, 2005, 05:56:11 PM »

Quote

Conservatives are spending like kids in a candy store.

Umm other than the very just war we are waging, spending is DOWN.

Steve · « **Reply #68 on:** February 21, 2005, 05:58:32 PM »

You'll have to teach me a little about libertarian policy. I mean, I am guilty of assuming libertarians are NOT socially liberal. I understand their views on individual liberties and forgein policy.

Martlet · « **Reply #69 on:** February 21, 2005, 06:02:59 PM »

Quote

Originally posted by Sandman
It's easier than you think.

Being fiscally conservative and socially liberal? It isn't that easy, nor is it that libertarian.

Let's talk about Welfare.

Tumor · « **Reply #70 on:** February 21, 2005, 06:21:49 PM »

Quote

Originally posted by Sandman
Like I said... I'm a moderate.

oh good lord!

Tumor · « **Reply #71 on:** February 21, 2005, 06:23:29 PM »

Quote

Originally posted by JB88
odd how that works isnt it.

ya. wtg republicons.

I love sore losers

Tumor · « **Reply #72 on:** February 21, 2005, 06:28:06 PM »

Quote

Originally posted by Steve
Yes, a documentary is supposed to have an unbiased view of the subject matter. Moore is so far to the left that he's almost off the horizon. The only people who consider his work documentary are left wing idiots and whackjobs. Notice the tards that are commenting that it's a documentary, like Thrawn and Nash. They don't get any more Kooky and dangerous than those two wingnuts.

BRILLIANT!

Sandman · « **Reply #73 on:** February 21, 2005, 06:30:13 PM »

Quote

Originally posted by Martlet
Being fiscally conservative and socially liberal? It isn't that easy, nor is it that libertarian.

Sure it is. The term applies to tolerance, not government subsidy.

It's a gross oversimplification but it boils down to the belief that the government has no place in my bedroom and better have a good reason for being in my wallet.

Martlet · « **Reply #74 on:** February 21, 2005, 06:36:24 PM »

Quote

Originally posted by Sandman
Sure it is. The term applies to tolerance, not government subsidy.

It's a gross oversimplification but it boils down to the belief that the government has no place in my bedroom and better have a good reason for being in my wallet.

Unfortunately, there is much about being socially liberal that directly conflicts with being fiscally conservative and even more so, libertarian. Again, I bring up welfare.

I identify more closely with libertarian than I do anything else.