Author Topic: can we have....  (Read 885 times)

Offline Panzzer

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2890
can we have....
« Reply #15 on: February 23, 2005, 01:17:49 PM »
Don't forget that we need the Brewster. :) With some Russian planes...
Panzzer - Lentorykmentti 3

Offline 6GunUSMC

  • Parolee
  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 424
      • http://www.fasteasynet.com
can we have....
« Reply #16 on: February 23, 2005, 01:18:36 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by JB42
What i was trying to get at is a plane that served the last 15 months of a 72 month (and one day) war would hardly make it teh bomber of that time-span. If anything, I would argue that the B-29 started a new era on it's own.

The era of I'm to high for you to shoot me down :p

As for "my Ta-152s and Dorkas", i wouldn't consider them post-war, they weren't widely used like the B-29 after 1945 sheesh

In the end, the fact remains, most people want the B-29 so they can afk for an hour and bomb HQs with impunity. There are far more vital planes that still need to be added. Not that I care much, but hell, we don't even have a French plane. They were in that war weren't they?

how about:

PZL P-24
Fokker D.XXI
Arsenal VG-33
Dewoitine D.520
Gladiators and/or Swordfish
Bf410
Fiat G.55
Reggiane Re.2005
VL Myrsky
IAR 80
Lavochkin LaGG-3
Mig-3


I agree that other planes need to be added as well and yes, it was a 6 year conflict and 15 months out of a 72 month conflict may seem minuscule but it is over 20% of that time and those 15 months are a full 33% of the official US involvement in the war.

I think that a bomber of this much historical importance should not be overlooked.  It's service ceiling is 4,000 feet LOWER than the B-17.

I would love to see the Condor and the B-25H added as well, but in this case I believe the historical importance of the B-29 warrants its addition to the planeset.  Remember this plane was so important that the odious Joe Stalin himself ordered that the 3 B-29s that crash landed in siberia after receiving battle damage over japan be copied exactly down to the last detail.  Our "Ally" (using that term VERY loosely) copied this bomber and it became the TU-4 "Bull"

I don't want to get into any arguments based on other post-war planes that are here. (Example 3 gun La-7)  I think this plane deserves better that a petty argument like that, and it has a great enough record to easily stand up for itself.  This plane had good numbers (nearly 3,900), saw PLENTY of combat and was a technological marvel of its day which included computerized gun turrets!  

Seriously, historically - This airplane BELONGS here, it earned that spot.  I am not asking for a 1946 bomber like the B-36! LOL (:::Thinking:::  45K ceiling...  86,000 lb payload...  16 20mm canon defense...   HEy HiTech!!!! Can I pleeeee.......  nah)

Offline Howitzer

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1579
can we have....
« Reply #17 on: February 23, 2005, 01:51:23 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by Panzzer
Don't forget that we need the Brewster. :) With some Russian planes...


That dog just won't hunt  =)

Offline Elfie

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 6143
can we have....
« Reply #18 on: February 23, 2005, 03:35:27 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by Howitzer
That dog just won't hunt  =)


Actually Howi....the Finnish pilots flying Brewster Buffalo's racked up some pretty impressive kill totals. Otoh the Finns are the only ones who seemed to have any real success with it. Kinda like the P-39 Airacobra and the Soviets heh.
Corkyjr on country jumping:
In the end you should be thankful for those players like us who switch to try and help keep things even because our willingness to do so, helps a more selfish, I want it my way player, get to fly his latewar uber ride.

Offline Howitzer

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1579
can we have....
« Reply #19 on: February 23, 2005, 03:56:56 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by Elfie
Actually Howi....the Finnish pilots flying Brewster Buffalo's racked up some pretty impressive kill totals. Otoh the Finns are the only ones who seemed to have any real success with it. Kinda like the P-39 Airacobra and the Soviets heh.


I know they did, but they didn't have la7s, d9s, typhies, and mustangs trying to BnZ them constantly...  I have nothing against the plane, just don't think it has a place in the MA.  Heard different stuff about it, just not sure why we should add another plane with an ENY value of 60.  How many spit Is you see on a given day?  :p

I'm just biased I guess....  But this horse has already been beaten to death anyway, so it really doesn't make a difference what I think.  Just stirring the pot  :aok

Offline StarOfAfrica2

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 5162
      • http://www.vf-17.org
can we have....
« Reply #20 on: February 23, 2005, 04:19:28 PM »
Swordfish!!!!   Swordfish!!!!   Swordfish!!!!   Swordfish!!!!   Swordfish!!!!   :D

Offline Karnak

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 23048
can we have....
« Reply #21 on: February 23, 2005, 06:18:23 PM »
I'd like to see the B-29 just to watch the dweebs try to get a 200 perk point (600 for the formation) bomber with over 80lbs.sq.ft of wingloading off our short runways that a Lanc can barely get off of.

That'd be amusing.  That and the cacophony of BBS whines about how the trees, or hill, or town, ate their 600 perk points and HTC has to give them a refund. :D

Yeah, that'd be fun.
Petals floating by,
      Drift through my woman's hand,
             As she remembers me-

Offline Grits

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 5332
can we have....
« Reply #22 on: February 23, 2005, 06:47:55 PM »
Skua!! 1ts teh Ub3r!!

Offline 2stony

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 892
can we have....
« Reply #23 on: February 24, 2005, 03:28:37 PM »
How about these buffs.

He-111
Betty
B-25
Wellington


and these planes.....

P-39
Laggs
Me-210
Me-410
Beaufighter


:aok