Author Topic: gun safety  (Read 1770 times)

Offline Monk

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1823
gun safety
« Reply #60 on: March 12, 2005, 01:47:00 AM »
Quote
Originally posted by lazs2
A dea agent shooting himself is not really a huge trajedy in my book but..
Same thing I thought.  DEA, oh that explains it.

Offline culero

  • Persona Non Grata
  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2528
gun safety
« Reply #61 on: March 12, 2005, 02:42:29 AM »
Quote
Originally posted by lazs2
snip
If I had to pick one handgun for every use it would probly be the 44 mag.  
snip
Nothing more fun to plink with than a 44 mag either.


Absolutely, same here. One handgun only, gotta be the .44MAG. Love it, most versatile thing out there. Only reason I choose the 1911 for carry is its size/shape (I'm large, it fits behind my hip almost invisibly, and is low drag on the draw) and the very slight second shot speed advantage it has over the revolver.

Speaking of "small" in .44MAG, ever see a ROHM MOD.57 .44MAG? 4" DA revolver. I have never heard of this, but ran into it in a pawn shop for $200 a few years back. The size aspect was so cool I had to grab it. Its about the size of a typical .357 service revolver, heavier of course. Piece of crap in terms of finish appearance, but I've shot a few rounds through it, it works ~shrug~. I keep it as a curiousity and potential "not essential to retain after use" auxiliary carry piece.

I can't find it by Googling, could take a digital pic if ya haven't seen one and want to.

Quote
Originally posted by lazs2
snip
Alternately... the .357mag is a great round and I have a j frame of scandium that weighs 12 oz in .357... can be fired from inside the pocket if you were so inclined (shrouded hammer) if you didn't mind setting yourself on fire.   a good .357 is my second choice for plinking with the .45 third along with a 22


I like .357 third behind the stated choices (it is still #1 on the one-shot-stop charts, isn't it?). Although I prefer large bore, you can't argue with performance and some would decide its more versatile than .44MAG (I won't digress to .41MAG which IMO is an oddity).

My wife has a SWEET S&W 686-3 6 inch I am really impressed with, its had a custom trigger job somewhere and I've never felt as smooth a double action as this particular individual. Only knock is the damn trigger is TOO hair, prolly 2 ounces with zero creep, so its dangerous as anything but a target piece. Damn shame, the gunsmith shoulda known better. Still, beautiful finish, strong as an ox, nice piece. I just can't get to like the shape of S&W pistol  frames, tho, they simply don't feel natural in my hands, I much prefer Rugers.

My favorite .357 is my stainless 4 5/8ths  Blackhawk, stock grips. Its a knocked-around tool (I've actually used the grip framemember to drive a small nail once, long story but true :)) with stock trigger. I use it to carry in the boat, salt air and all that. Strictly a tool, but I can shoot a 25-cent-piece size group with it at 25 feet, so it works as a defense weapon just fine.


Quote
Originally posted by lazs2
snipYour load sounded way hot even in a carbine but I was thinking 250 grain slug... with a 225 it is still kinda hot for a hndgun tho.  I have settled on loads that run about 1200 fps out of a 4" with 250 grain semi wadcutter or... in the house... 240 grain hydrashock by federal.

lazs


Yeah that load was one I creeped up to from several grains of powder less, yer right its pretty damned hot. Its the max my 7 1/2 Super Blackhawk will eat with no visible signs of case/primer distortion. Matter of fact, my carbine is a Savage 1894 Model and apparently its a tad looser than the pistol, because the same load produces just a teeny hint of a lip around the pin mark in the primer. I use it there with a little trepidation :)

I worked up this load after a shooting incident, only true self-defense with a weapon discharge involved I've been party to. I was motivated to research the load for a quite interesting and amusing reason. Indulge me, you'll like this :D

I awoke one night to the sound of men shouting, about midnight. I went out my back door to investigate.

Parked in the driveway that runs past my house to the pasture behind my house, just in front of the closed gate, I saw a car, engine running, headlights on. Two men were in front of it, between the car and the gate, engaged in a fistfight.

I walked over there, stopped at 50 feet distance, and trained my Maglight on them, announcing my presence in my best drill instructor voice (my life experience includes the command of two different military precision drill teams, one ROTC one USAF Regular) "WTF, OVER???"

The closest subject turned to face me, they stopped fighting, and he told me "Turn that ***** flashlight off!" Of course, I didn't, and repeated myself.

This moron's reaction was to yell "I told you to turn that ***** flashlight off, now I'm gonna whup yer ass!" Then, with that said, he charged me at full speed.

OK. Normally, my protcol by dint of my study of CQB and philosophy of application of force at this point would be to stand my ground, time a sidestep to allow him to begin to pass, and stroke him carefully across the head with the Maglight, being careful to stun him but not create more than maybe a minor skull fracture at most, ideally just a minor concussion. Just put him down, no need to hurt him badly.

But, problem. I've got the Maglight in my weak hand. I can still go, but only 85% confidence of precision as opposed to close to 100% with strong hand.

Reason its weak hand is I have the Super Blackhawk in strong hand.

Now, my dilemma is that he's started from 50 feet, closing fast, decision time. I do not believe in pistol whipping, too much bad can happen. Probability of a stop with the Maglight is high, but not certain.

Deciding factor is the possibility he manages to engage and grapple for the weapon somehow. I rate this as unlikely but unacceptable as a risk. So, I did what I do not believe in, but quickly decided was necessary.

I fired a "warning shot".

I just raised the weapon at arm's length straight up and fired it. This is a rural area, I'm OK with the "where's it going" thing for expediency's sake. I want to both announce that he's bringing his unarmed stupid prettythang to a potential gunfight, AND at the same time place the weapon as far away from him as possible if he chooses to continue to close. Next step is back to standard doctrine (engage with the Maglight if necessary). I'm doing my best here to deter contact, OK?

Ever see a rock singer take a run at the audience, then lean back while dropping to his knees and sliding on the stage? That's what this butthead did, screaming "NOOOOOOOOOO DOOOOOOONNNNNN'T SHOOOOOOT MEEEEE!!!!!!!!!!" The change of facial expression from belligerent to panicked beyond imagination was truly remarkable :)

Whole thing played out well, the other guy ran but returned after a while when it became apparent I was yelling lessons at a live and mobile idiot rather than a corpse, they left without further incident and never returned. End of problem.

The whole point of this story was about the handload, tho. See, I was just beginning to learn handloading at that time. I was using something like Unique or Bullseye or something similar, don't remember exactly.

Anyway, the muzzle flash was ENORMOUS, dude! I was flabbergasted. I saw side flame at least 8 inches long in my peripheral vision. I have no clue as to how long the main flame was, but it lit the scene up like a lightning flash. If I hadn't had the weapon high, I woulda been blinded for sure (remember, midnight and pitch friggin dark).

My next opportunity to study the matter focused on researching the subject and obtaining various powder types. IMR4227 proved in my experience to produce the least flash in relation to power I could figure out. I could be wrong, but that's where I got (20+ years ago, I haven't loaded much in the last 18 so you may know something better available now).

So I creeped it up observing case/primers until I saw a problem, and backed down a few tenths of a grain. I never intended this as a round to use a lot of, but rather as a "keep it in the gun for emergency use or hunting" thing, no need to abuse a good weapon.

If I remember right that was a compressed load at that weight.

Side note, I used the same powder and method to max out a load with Hornady  240gr FMJ point. I wanted to experiment with what 44MAG could do in terms of penetration.

There's a 10" creosote post (or was) in good shape with explosive-looking exit wounds from full-diameter penetrations out there in that pasture, I was kinda pleased/amused with that for an afternoon once :lol

culero
“Before we're done with them, the Japanese language will be spoken only in Hell!” - Adm. William F. "Bull" Halsey

Offline culero

  • Persona Non Grata
  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2528
gun safety
« Reply #62 on: March 12, 2005, 02:46:20 AM »
Quote
Originally posted by Monk
Same thing I thought.  DEA, oh that explains it.


Yeah I've met a very few of 'em that were OK, mostly idiots in my experience.

culero (had their local undercover car repair jobs in my shop for a few years, shot with 'em some at the range a few times)
“Before we're done with them, the Japanese language will be spoken only in Hell!” - Adm. William F. "Bull" Halsey

Offline lazs2

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 24886
gun safety
« Reply #63 on: March 12, 2005, 08:57:54 AM »
you can buy a new hammer and trigger for the .357

I can get a second shot in plenty of time with just about any gtun I can think of.   If you do the first one right you won't need it (even shooting straight up in the air is "right" in some cases as your example shows)... If you do the first one wrong... you will have even less chance of making the second one work out... gunfire tends to make people panic and be less than ideal targets.

The reason the .45 acp gets relagated to third for plinking is it's rainbow trajectory and with normal sights... inabilityu to be useful at various ranges.   The .357 is VERY accurate... doesn't throw away the expensive brass and shoots flat like a 44 mag..  A 22 is allways fun and cheap and... a few cylinders or mags full of 22's will settle down a flinch that the 44 gave me.

sciaf... you seem to feel that it is fine for you to own and enjoy guns and even to carelessly handle them or allow your wife to yet... you are against your fellow man having these same rights... Is that a fair assesment?

lazs

Offline culero

  • Persona Non Grata
  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2528
gun safety
« Reply #64 on: March 12, 2005, 09:39:45 AM »
Quote
Originally posted by lazs2
you can buy a new hammer and trigger for the .357


Yeah but she's happy with it as is and I don't wanna use it, so no need. Its mostly a showpiece in her mind (although she is very capable with handguns and does fire a few through it periodically just because).

Quote
Originally posted by lazs2

I can get a second shot in plenty of time with just about any gtun I can think of.   If you do the first one right you won't need it (even shooting straight up in the air is "right" in some cases as your example shows)... If you do the first one wrong... you will have even less chance of making the second one work out... gunfire tends to make people panic and be less than ideal targets.


All very true. (Well, I'm trusting you as to your ability ;))

Don't misunderstand me, my point about second shots relative to the decision to use a 1911 for self defense carry isn't the largest factor. I agree the difference in times between semi-auto and revolver for a skillful shooter may be so small as to be relatively insignificant, or even nil. Its a skills thing. In my case, I am marginally faster on target with the 1911, but admittedly only marginally.

The large factor for me is the carry itself. Nothing "fits" me as well as my slabsided friend. It just feels right, and confidence is important. Plus, those flat sides slide like a sled on snow as it draws. I am significantly faster to draw and mount with it than a large revolver in a concealed carry (plus the revolver simply won't conceal as well). First shot wins when all else is equal, and the munition is adequate in power, so I choose 1911. Of course YMMV. Many "right" choices exist :)

Quote
Originally posted by lazs2

The reason the .45 acp gets relagated to third for plinking is it's rainbow trajectory and with normal sights
snip
a few cylinders or mags full of 22's will settle down a flinch that the 44 gave me.


My philosophy regarding CQB for self defense is that my handgun will almost certainly never be used at a range that makes trajectory relevant. If I enjoy distance in a dangerous situation, I'd tend to use cover and all available means of escape rather than stand my ground and lob shots. If a rare situation came up that dictated engagement at all costs, I'd tend to try to use cover and close the range if possible.

In this situation, I'd much prefer a rifle if possible, of course. But I'm not a cop or a soldier, so I rate this possibility as almost nil. I'm lucky enough to say I can control my circumstances and exposures. Therefore my statement regarding the relevance of trajectory to my personal considerations. Of course, again, YMMV.

Agreed as to .22's value as a training aid. I am a lifelong and avid long gun shooter since the age of 8, but never used handguns until age 30. I had a whim to try handguns as a hobby so I bought a couple of Rugers - a Single Six with both cylinders and my Super Blackhawk.

I literally taught myself to shoot by dry firing at the TV while relaxing at night after supper (ID a character in the show as "target", mount and dry fire a head shot whenever target appears, evaluate sight alignment as hammer hits bottom, wash rinse repeat 1000s of times). Weekends I'd go burn as much of a brick in the .22 as I could without getting bored, then finish with a box or two in the .44 for record. Didn't take me long to get where I wanted to be.

Quick anecdote to illustrate I agree totally as to the value of the first shot and the ability of revolver to make second shots: I once shot pins with a group I'm acquainted with, most of whom are federal law enforcement types who are also shooting enthusiasts. I brought the Super Blackhawk as weapon. They all laughed and ribbed me mercilessly when I opened my rug.

I shot last. My times beat every one of theirs (all using their semi-auto service weapons) significantly, plus I only ever expended one shot per pin, period. (Some of these guys had to change magazines, dude. Amazingly, one of 'em  changed a second magazine before he cleared one string.)

I politely chuckled just a tad as the pot holder forked their money over. I'm a polite guy :)

culero
« Last Edit: March 12, 2005, 09:46:01 AM by culero »
“Before we're done with them, the Japanese language will be spoken only in Hell!” - Adm. William F. "Bull" Halsey

Offline lazs2

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 24886
gun safety
« Reply #65 on: March 12, 2005, 09:53:45 AM »
I think we agree... I even used BB guns and the tv for "training" many years ago..

I like the feel of the 1911 a lot.. I like the feel of a good revolver too... for defense, I don't care about trajectory or even accuracy.  If they are more than 20 feet away they are probly not a threat in most cases....  

I was talking about plinking.. that is what I do.  I don't shoot at people very often but I do a lot of plinking and showing people how to shoot (goodwill stuff) and that is what I base a lot of gun buying on.

for defense... you need something you will carry... check out the smith 340pd.. it is 12 oz .357... everyone asks "is this a real gun?" when I hand it to em... it will fit in your front pocket and you won't know it is there... if a cell phone is easy for you to carry then the PD will be no problem... Talk about loud and muzzle blast!!!

The thing will set em on fire at any range you need it.   If someone gets hit with a 125 grain federal HP they are gonna stop being mean to me.  I love the .45 and my 44's but... check one of these babies out... the recoil is horrendous tho and I am not one to be "sensitive" to recoil.

My first 44 was a super blackhawk in '73 ... I still own it.  I have over 50,000 rounds through it and cut the barrel down to 5.5" a 10 years or so ago.

any kind of shooting is fun tho.

lazs

Offline culero

  • Persona Non Grata
  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2528
gun safety
« Reply #66 on: March 13, 2005, 07:32:23 AM »
Quote
Originally posted by lazs2
snip
I was talking about plinking.. that is what I do.  I don't shoot at people very often but I do a lot of plinking and showing people how to shoot (goodwill stuff) and that is what I base a lot of gun buying on.


Rgr all. And we also agree about plinking (can't beat .44 and .22).

Quote
Originally posted by lazs2
snip
for defense... you need something you will carry... check out the smith 340pd.. it is 12 oz .357... everyone asks "is this a real gun?" when I hand it to em... it will fit in your front pocket and you won't know it is there... if a cell phone is easy for you to carry then the PD will be no problem... Talk about loud and muzzle blast!!!

The thing will set em on fire at any range you need it.   If someone gets hit with a 125 grain federal HP they are gonna stop being mean to me.


Yeap. Matter of fact, isn't that round #1 on the one-shot-stop chart?

My thing is that I simply don't go places where I need to be armed anymore. I used to, but don't have the need or inclination to now. There's a lot to be said for simply choosing where you want to be. Point is, I rarely have the need lately to have the weapon in concealed carry.

I've been making do with a derringer for those times that I do want something on me, for exactly the reasons you point out.

Now, of course out on the road in traffic you never know what you may encounter, so I do carry the 1911 with a couple of extra magazines in a rug in the car. I'm sure you'd agree that application makes its size/weight less of a consideration. Whenever I feel the need to take it with me when I get out of the car, it fits nicely behind my hip in a belt carry, magazines in hip pocket.. Just the equipment I need and no more.

Thanks for the tip on this piece, I'll be looking and prolly in the market, it sounds great. If nothing else, I may select it as a replacement for what I require my wife to have in her purse whenever she leaves the house (currently a Detective Model .38 loaded with +P daisy cutters). She doesn't go bad places either, but unarmed obnoxious buttheads are everywhere and she doesn't enjoy the size and ability I do to allow her to intimidate them into leaving her alone. She needs a persuader :)

 
Quote
Originally posted by lazs2
snip
any kind of shooting is fun tho.

lazs


Word. We'd all be better off if more people realized that.

Its always nice to discover other well-focused enthusiasts. ~S~

culero
« Last Edit: March 13, 2005, 07:36:43 AM by culero »
“Before we're done with them, the Japanese language will be spoken only in Hell!” - Adm. William F. "Bull" Halsey

Offline culero

  • Persona Non Grata
  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2528
wow, never saw these before
« Reply #67 on: March 13, 2005, 07:47:31 AM »
http://www.crimsontrace.com/

When I Googled to look at that Smith, I found a forum post that mentioned these. Very neat idea.

You know anything you can tell me about them?

culero

PS - here's the post I referred to, the author seems to feel as you do regarding this weapon.
« Last Edit: March 13, 2005, 07:52:21 AM by culero »
“Before we're done with them, the Japanese language will be spoken only in Hell!” - Adm. William F. "Bull" Halsey

Offline lazs2

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 24886
gun safety
« Reply #68 on: March 13, 2005, 09:26:14 AM »
culero, the guy in the post pretty much said it but... I have no use for laser grip thingies on this tiny little gun nor do I have any use for 38 special loads in it... I have owned enough 38 special j frames in the past.

Mine.. I spent money on eagle secret service grips... well grip migt be too strong of a word here... My "grip" is one finger on my large hands.   The stock grips are some crappy sticky rubber that is all the rage for dampening recoil and making people into lousy shots...  They are useless.

What good is a shrouded, rounded pocket gun if the grips are like trying to get used chewing gum out of your pocket?  I got ebonywood SS griops for mine... slips in and out of the pocket easily.

The gun is unbelievably light.   It will sit in your front pocket without anyone knowing.   The gun looks and feels fake.  It also has a gritty feel to the action that is slightly unpleasant.   It won't wear in because I won't shoot it that much.  

Shooting it..  Nothing you have shot will prepare you for shooting 125 federal .357's in it.  The word recoil needs to be redefined... I t hurts to shoot it.   My brother shot it one time and asked if I could get my money back.  I have only fired 5 rounds in a row out of it one time.   It is a J frame smith tho and as such should shoot 4-5" groups at 25 yards like all the rest... I will steel myself and try.  muzzle blast is on the "end of the world" scale  at the range everyone stopped and watched after the first round...  smaller hands may be better tho with this gun.

Now... that brings me to the point... like you,I no longer go places that may be a danger... maybe.. who knows?  church may be a bad spot or the court these days... Mostly being around guns is habit and enjoyment...Kimber on the counter as we speak... taken from the nightstand.. I travel with the kimber in my bag.

If I ever again feel the need to carry all the time I will have the PD.   I have had a lot of guns and the PD is a no nonsenencense, powerful gun that is absolutely the best tool for not being seen to carry and not having an excuse to leave home and.... for stopping a close range dangerous situation.   I wouldn't want to get into a gunfight with it but..  It would do if I did my part.   Lots of bad guys have been outgunned by a J frame smith over the years.

It just seemed like a good idea and better for about everything than my PPK or Makarov so far as defense goes.  They even make a nifty little "jet" speedloader that springs in five new rounds in the blink of an eye..  Like you would ever need that.

lazs

Offline Masherbrum

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 22416
gun safety
« Reply #69 on: March 13, 2005, 10:36:50 AM »
Quote
Originally posted by EN4CER
You have to be kidding / exaggerating right? If your not than I have to give your local municipality credit for hiring the handicapped. I'm not gonna say the length of time that has passed since the last range accident here because I don't want to jinx it but it was before I was hired.


I'm not kidding.

Karaya
FSO Squad 412th FNVG
http://worldfamousfridaynighters.com/
Co-Founder of DFC

Offline beet1e

  • Persona Non Grata
  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 7848
gun safety
« Reply #70 on: March 18, 2005, 02:45:47 AM »
ROFL!

Saw this video which was in another thread which pointed to this one.

I nearly did the same thing on my day out with Lazs! Well not really. I had to ask lazs how to hold the gun when pulling that slide back, ie finger outside the trigger guard, but OK to hold fingers on the outside of the guard itself. I pointed it down at the ground at a 45 angle when I did.


BUT......................

Having seen the video, I'd say it was a deliberate act - especially when he said "OK, fetch me the other gun"! That got the class rattled and brought home the gravity of the situation.

Of course, I'm not suggesting that a live round was used. But would it not have been possible to use some sort of blank round? The sound of the gun going off was nowhere near as loud as Lazs's hand held cannon.

It reminded me of a film I saw about SAS selection jungle training in Sarawak/Borneo. The trainer asked one of the recruits to bring a box that had been found over to where the rest of the group was standing. As the recruit picked it up, it burst into flames. It had been rigged as an incendiary device. The trainer's point was "NEVER pick anything up in the jungle"

Offline Siaf__csf

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2213
gun safety
« Reply #71 on: March 18, 2005, 03:48:13 AM »
Quote
Of course, I'm not suggesting that a live round was used. But would it not have been possible to use some sort of blank round? The sound of the gun going off was nowhere near as loud as Lazs's hand held cannon.


Modern recording technology can only produce a dynamic range of 120db. Compressed way way less. Less than less played through computer speakers. :)

Offline lazs2

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 24886
gun safety
« Reply #72 on: March 18, 2005, 09:26:50 AM »
beet... through the electronic muffs you and tomato were wearing the sound of my "cannons" was about like that of a TV gun... they muffle loud noise and enhance quiet ones.   I try to teach basic gun safety and have fun at the same time when taking new people out.   That is why I didn't shoot much and watched you guys.

If you recall... you wanted to take off the muffs and hear what the 44 mag sounded like without ear protection and I wouldn't let you.   I would advise against anyone shooting (especially powerful handguns) without ear protection.

jb88 did and now... he is not only gay but can't hear a word I say.

lazs

Offline culero

  • Persona Non Grata
  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2528
gun safety
« Reply #73 on: March 19, 2005, 09:16:44 PM »
lazs, rgr all, I totally agree with the philosophic points you expressed, the points about grips and utility, and am receptive to your preference for this particular weapon for the purpose you cite.

I actually meant to ask if you had any experience or knowledge regarding the performance of that grip-contained laser, I'd never seen them before and am intrigued.

Others, listen and heed what lazs is saying about hearing protection. Shooting any handgun without protection is a risk of hearing damage/loss. Shooting a .44MAG without hearing protection is a sure-fire recipe :)

culero (stuff 'em or muff 'em is my motto)
“Before we're done with them, the Japanese language will be spoken only in Hell!” - Adm. William F. "Bull" Halsey

Offline Lizking

  • Parolee
  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2502
gun safety
« Reply #74 on: March 19, 2005, 09:24:13 PM »
My BIL is DEA, and I wouldn't trust him with a BBgun, but the government gives him a  44' pursuit boat and highpowered weapons .