Author Topic: I don't think this will be in "The Armed Citizen"  (Read 3077 times)

Offline Red Tail 444

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2497
      • http://www.redtail.org
I don't think this will be in "The Armed Citizen"
« Reply #45 on: March 14, 2005, 01:24:19 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by Creamo
No worse than strapping a loaded gun to a overweight grandma, and putting her next to violent rapists in a court house. Neither should be punished, but both cases should serve as a lesson to everyone else.


Grandma should be fired, as well as the shift supervisor who assigned her to escort that nut into court.

Offline Toad

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 18415
I don't think this will be in "The Armed Citizen"
« Reply #46 on: March 14, 2005, 01:35:55 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by Leslie
I feel bad disagreeing with you Toad about the British and all during the Revolutionary War.  But we didn't drive them out, they left to deal with other issues.  If they had wanted to, they would have won.  We wouldn't have had a chance. Les


We wouldn't have had a chance without the French fleet. With the French fleet, I think our chances were pretty good.
If ye love wealth better than liberty, the tranquility of servitude than the animated contest of freedom, go from us in peace. We ask not your counsels or arms. Crouch down and lick the hands which feed you. May your chains sit lightly upon you, and may posterity forget that you were our countrymen!

Offline beet1e

  • Persona Non Grata
  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 7848
I don't think this will be in "The Armed Citizen"
« Reply #47 on: March 14, 2005, 02:03:13 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by Heretik
I'd be intersted to see the statistics for total homicides and assaults (per capita) side by side.  Of course banning guns will reduce the number of gun murders, but what about total murders?  I'd like to see the figures for assaults as well, since attempted homicide with a gun is probably more likely to succeed, weighting the US murder column unfairly.
In 2003, there were 14,408 victims of homicide in the US. In Britain in the same year, it was approximately 800. I say approximately because the Home Office gives a figure for 2002/03, but that period included the hundreds of homicides committed by the serial killer Dr. Harold Shipman over a period spanning at least three decades.

So - there are about 18 times as many homicides in the US as in the UK, but allowing for the population discrepancy, the US homicide is about 3.6 times that of Britain, per capita. But... I doubt that we have thousands of accidental gun deaths, as in the US.

Ah, Mr Toad! An honest post from you at last! :D I see that you have gone through the five phases of death in recognising that the US does indeed have a problem viz. firearms and homicides/accidental gun killings. The five phases are Anger, Denial, Bargaining, Depression, Acceptance. You're at the Acceptance stage. Lazs too. You have both finally accepted that your system is different from ours. You have also accepted that a high mortality rate is an inevitable consequence of the American "Guns-4-All" policy protected by the 2nd Amendment.

I don't ask any more of you - as long as you are prepared to drop the silly "more guns = less crime" rhetoric, and accept that there will be many thousands of lives lost as a natural consequence of handing out guns like copies of "The Big Issue", we need argue no more.

I have never said that America should give up its guns - far too late to try that; a totally unworkable proposal.

But you only have to look at homicides, patterns of homicide, and accidental deaths to realise that there is a heavy price to be paid for your "freedoms".

And, in light of how things have turned out in America, the stance of many governments around the world with regard to prohibition of firearms makes total sense.

Offline GtoRA2

  • Persona Non Grata
  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 8339
I don't think this will be in "The Armed Citizen"
« Reply #48 on: March 14, 2005, 02:10:53 PM »
Guess Toad and Laz don't mind his "arguments" lol.


Clubing baby seals gets old eventualy though.
:D

Offline lazs2

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 24886
I don't think this will be in "The Armed Citizen"
« Reply #49 on: March 14, 2005, 02:12:15 PM »
beet... your own example shows that only 32 children between 1-4 were murdered by firearms... I believe the accident rate is about 60-70 per year...

In the U.S.  the more guns the less crime.  that is all there is to it.. communities that pass draconian tyranical gun laws have more crime... those that trust their citizens with concealled carry enjoy a drop in crime.  

and... if more guns do not equal less crime then why are you arming more and more of your police in entgland?

lazs

Offline Jackal1

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 9092
I don't think this will be in "The Armed Citizen"
« Reply #50 on: March 14, 2005, 02:32:51 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by beet1e
Actually, I don't think it would be that easy for a four year old to drown a two year old in a 5 gallon bucket. First, he'd have to plan it: get the bucket to a water supply, and turn it on. A four year old might have difficulty doing that. Then he would have to carry the bucket to where the two year old was. 5 gallons? That's nearly 19 litres and would therefore weigh about 19 Kg. Nope, sorry. I don't see a four year old going through with this.
 


Bwaahahhaaaa! I can`t believe even you tryed something as this that leaves the obvious flaw........well so obvious.
We`ll just call it a near miss on the Troll scale. :D
Democracy is two wolves deciding on what to eat. Freedom is a well armed sheep protesting the vote.
------------------------------------------------------------------

Offline Elfie

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 6142
I don't think this will be in "The Armed Citizen"
« Reply #51 on: March 14, 2005, 02:39:32 PM »
Quote
Furthermore, you talk about all the lives being saved by guns. If more guns made a safer society, the US would be the safest country on the planet.


What you consistently fail to realize Beet1e is that if all the guns were taken away from law abiding citizens today, America would see a huge increase in crime. Morton Grove, Illinois is a perfect example. Depending on the source, 1.5 - 3 MILLION times each and every year law abiding citizens use legally owned firearms to foil crimes. In the vast majority of those cases the weapon isn't even fired. The mere prescence of a firearm deters the criminal in most cases.

You also fail to realize that when gun control laws are relaxed here in the US (one example is concealed  carry laws) crime goes DOWN. When laws are made more restrictive, crime goes UP. You also conviently ignore all crime except those commited with a gun. Crime is crime regardless of whether or not a gun is used.

Since I no longer wish to see YOUR silly rhetoric, I am putting you on my ignore list right after I click the submit button. You sir, have the distinct honor of being the sole person on my ignore list. Even zulu7 didnt get that honor :)
Corkyjr on country jumping:
In the end you should be thankful for those players like us who switch to try and help keep things even because our willingness to do so, helps a more selfish, I want it my way player, get to fly his latewar uber ride.

Offline rpm

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 15661
I don't think this will be in "The Armed Citizen"
« Reply #52 on: March 14, 2005, 02:58:17 PM »
Two words. Trigger lock.
My mind is a raging torrent, flooded with rivulets of thought cascading into a waterfall of creative alternatives.
Stay thirsty my friends.

Offline Curval

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 11572
      • http://n/a
I don't think this will be in "The Armed Citizen"
« Reply #53 on: March 14, 2005, 03:15:11 PM »
elfie,

I don't doubt what you say is true...in AMERICA.

Here, we have no, or very very very few incidents of, gun crimes.  

What would happen if guns were made legal and easily availiable here in your opinion?

Do you honestly think that there would be less crime overall?

Do you think that an increase in gun crime and gun related accidents and injuries would result also?

If so, is this a reasonable trade off?

Less robberies, more death?

Please try and think outside your normal way of thinking on this issue for just a couple of minutes and answer honestly.
Some will fall in love with life and drink it from a fountain that is pouring like an avalanche coming down the mountain

Offline Pongo

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 6701
I don't think this will be in "The Armed Citizen"
« Reply #54 on: March 14, 2005, 03:26:14 PM »
Americans once argued that making slavery illegal worked for Brits but wouldnt work for Americans.
We see here the kinds of arguments that were made.

Offline Elfie

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 6142
I don't think this will be in "The Armed Citizen"
« Reply #55 on: March 14, 2005, 03:33:54 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by Curval
elfie,

I don't doubt what you say is true...in AMERICA.

Here, we have no, or very very very few incidents of, gun crimes.  

What would happen if guns were made legal and easily availiable here in your opinion?

Do you honestly think that there would be less crime overall?

Do you think that an increase in gun crime and gun related accidents and injuries would result also?

If so, is this a reasonable trade off?

Less robberies, more death?

Please try and think outside your normal way of thinking on this issue for just a couple of minutes and answer honestly.


I honestly won't speak for your country Curval....the Bahamas...is that correct?
Corkyjr on country jumping:
In the end you should be thankful for those players like us who switch to try and help keep things even because our willingness to do so, helps a more selfish, I want it my way player, get to fly his latewar uber ride.

Offline Elfie

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 6142
I don't think this will be in "The Armed Citizen"
« Reply #56 on: March 14, 2005, 03:35:04 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by Pongo
Americans once argued that making slavery illegal worked for Brits but wouldnt work for Americans.
We see here the kinds of arguments that were made.


Pongo do you have a reference for that? Would be an interesting read imo.
Corkyjr on country jumping:
In the end you should be thankful for those players like us who switch to try and help keep things even because our willingness to do so, helps a more selfish, I want it my way player, get to fly his latewar uber ride.

Offline Toad

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 18415
I don't think this will be in "The Armed Citizen"
« Reply #57 on: March 14, 2005, 03:36:21 PM »
We had to fight a civil war to end slavery and the keeping of slaves wasn't in the Bill of Rights.
If ye love wealth better than liberty, the tranquility of servitude than the animated contest of freedom, go from us in peace. We ask not your counsels or arms. Crouch down and lick the hands which feed you. May your chains sit lightly upon you, and may posterity forget that you were our countrymen!

Offline Nashwan

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1864
I don't think this will be in "The Armed Citizen"
« Reply #58 on: March 14, 2005, 04:09:50 PM »
Quote
What you consistently fail to realize Beet1e is that if all the guns were taken away from law abiding citizens today, America would see a huge increase in crime. Morton Grove, Illinois is a perfect example. Depending on the source, 1.5 - 3 MILLION times each and every year law abiding citizens use legally owned firearms to foil crimes. In the vast majority of those cases the weapon isn't even fired. The mere prescence of a firearm deters the criminal in most cases.


I suspect that the mere presence of the person foils the vast majority of crimes.

I once "foiled" a burglary of my house by switching a light on and saying "oi", no gun needed.

Now if I'd had a gun, it would have gone down as "another crime stopped by an armed citizen".

Quote
You also fail to realize that when gun control laws are relaxed here in the US (one example is concealed carry laws) crime goes DOWN. When laws are made more restrictive, crime goes UP.


Is that true?

The Brady campaign make the claim on their website that crime has fallen less in those areas that have allowed easier concealed carry than those that haven't.

Toad did post some claim from a gun site, but it was more along the lines of "concealed carry areas have less crime", iirc.

That's not the same thing.

Quote
Crime is crime regardless of whether or not a gun is used.


I'd say crime committed with a gun would tend to be more serious.

Being punched and being shot are rarely comparable, for example.

Offline Holden McGroin

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 8591
I don't think this will be in "The Armed Citizen"
« Reply #59 on: March 14, 2005, 04:17:06 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by Nashwan
Being punched and being shot are rarely comparable, for example.


Is this considered a punch?

 

Holden McGroin LLC makes every effort to provide accurate and complete information. Since humor, irony, and keen insight may be foreign to some readers, no warranty, expressed or implied is offered. Re-writing this disclaimer cost me big bucks at the lawyer’s office!