Author Topic: Shiavo case (Read 2748 times)

Nash · « **Reply #135 on:** March 21, 2005, 07:03:10 PM »

Quote

Originally posted by midnight Target
Give up Nash... this one's about as useless as trying to sell ice to Calgary.

Heh.

TweetyBird · « **Reply #136 on:** March 21, 2005, 07:04:05 PM »

How about this MT, we don't practice euthanasia in this country until we decide on a humane way of doing it. Is that so much to ask? Why should a chicken being slaughtered for KFC be treated more humanely than this woman?

Nash · « **Reply #137 on:** March 21, 2005, 07:05:28 PM »

The same people who are squawking about the "inhumane" removing of feeding tubes are the 'zact same folks who would never allow any kind of gentler method.

midnight Target · « **Reply #138 on:** March 21, 2005, 07:06:45 PM »

Hellya Tweets. It would be much more humane to inject her with whatever. We just lack the scrotalbearings to do it.

Airhead · « **Reply #139 on:** March 21, 2005, 07:07:20 PM »

Quote

Originally posted by Nash

She cannot come back because there is no back to come back to.

I cracked open a walnut one time that was all jacked up like that. I didn't eat it.

midnight Target · « **Reply #140 on:** March 21, 2005, 07:09:12 PM »

Quote

Originally posted by Airhead
I cracked open a walnut one time that was all jacked up like that. I didn't eat it.

lol.. ...spit coffee you bastard.

ChickenHawk · « **Reply #141 on:** March 21, 2005, 07:09:48 PM »

Quote

Originally posted by TweetyBird
Yea congress should spend more time getting murderers off of death row

So we are in agreement that this would not be an appropriate job for congress. It's just as inappropriate for them to try and circumvent the judicial branch in the Shiavo case.

TweetyBird · « **Reply #142 on:** March 21, 2005, 07:12:42 PM »

>>Hellya Tweets. It would be much more humane to inject her with whatever. We just lack the scrotalbearings to do it.

<<

Well great - we're all on the same page and agree this barbaric method should be halted immediately and work on a constitutional ammedment addresing humane euthanasia.

This woman should NOT be starved to death.

Nash · « **Reply #143 on:** March 21, 2005, 07:17:38 PM »

Why didn't the Congress spend their time last night making that law, instead of the one that intruded into a single case of it?

They don't give a rats arse about that. In fact the medical and insurance lobyists would be screamin' bloody murder and be yankin' back the campain donations faster than you could blink.

TweetyBird · « **Reply #144 on:** March 21, 2005, 07:22:07 PM »

>>They don't give a rats arse about that. In fact the medical and insurance lobyists would be screamin' bloody murder and be yankin' back the campain donations faster than you could blink.
<<

So we've stepped back from logic and going to go to psychic readings now? Maybe its YOU who don't give a rats bellybutton about life. Maybe they DO.

Nash · « **Reply #145 on:** March 21, 2005, 07:25:38 PM »

Right... What you're sayin' is "logic"?

It's been emotional hysteria.

You're gettin' played.

RedTop · « **Reply #146 on:** March 21, 2005, 07:30:52 PM »

No living will = error on the side of life.

I wouldn't want to live like that. My WHOLE family knows this. I have a living will. No DNR. No living on breathing machines. No living if I cant on my own basically.

It's a tough call. Hubby seems a bit nuts IMO. I just cant get behind letting her die (starving or any other way) if nothing is wrote.

Family is willing to help her , and stuff , so I would have to say let them decide. Her Hubby has obviously "Went on with life" and should leve her be.

I think there is more to what is in it for him than we know. Could be a big reason he wants her gone now. Maybe he has exhausted all he can out of it and wants the rest of what is behind the scenes to just go away.

I don't know really. I have tried to sort of watch what has been happening with it. Really a tough call.

TweetyBird · « **Reply #147 on:** March 21, 2005, 07:35:56 PM »

>>Right... What you're sayin' is "logic"?

It's been emotional hysteria.

You're gettin' played.

<<

No argument again eh Nash? But that wouldn't stop you eh? Just post and post and someone might think its a point.

You are the one claiming to know why conrgess has acted. I think you are wrong and ther is no possible way to inteligently claim its grandstanding. MOST people in this country respect life and *dont* believe doctors are infallible.

Nash · « **Reply #148 on:** March 21, 2005, 07:41:03 PM »

Oh, I've made arguments in this thread, Tweety. You don't like them I guess.

I posted a pic of what's left of Terri's brain, and your response is "All these people who so greatly respect the cerebral cortex would go nuts if someone stomped a chicken to death."

Wha?

And you want to compare her to puppies. I can respect people's point of view, but yer being such a chick about this. 'Nuff with you.

Raider179 · « **Reply #149 on:** March 21, 2005, 07:53:37 PM »

Quote

Originally posted by TweetyBird
All these people who so greatly respect the cerebral cortex would go nuts if someone stomped a chicken to death. Yet they see no problem starving a human to death. Just when you think we can get no nuttier, something shows we are a country of kneejerk, arogant morons.

yeah science breeds ignorance.... You make all these accusations about those of us who think she deserves the right to die it blows my mind where you are coming up with them. Probably rush limbaugh.

edited for bad wording...