Author Topic: Another registered sex offender abducts another child (Read 1073 times)

bj229r · « **Reply #15 on:** March 25, 2005, 08:31:25 PM »

The ACLU types stop such things as 'chemical neutering' via court actions every time. See, WE have commie-libs too

myelo · « **Reply #16 on:** March 25, 2005, 08:39:33 PM »

Quote

Originally posted by GtoRA2
Would you believe there is a group of people out there who think the whole idea of making these animals register is bad?

Maybe because registering them doesn't seem to be working?

vorticon · « **Reply #17 on:** March 25, 2005, 08:59:38 PM »

"
There's no rehabilitation nor cure for child rapists. Period."

agreed, just shoot em...messy like, no funeral.

for lesser offenses of pedophilia (proof the sick ****er has some self control)

keep a very close eye on em and make sure they live in adult only communities (****, just tattoo pedo in blue ink on their forhead...) and gscholz "chemical neutering" or just straight castration...

then again, its a ticking time bomb...labour camps 500 miles from nowhere should work with high risk people that cant be shot...

Airhead · « **Reply #18 on:** March 25, 2005, 09:07:30 PM »

Quote

Originally posted by GScholz
Sure there is ... it’s called “chemical neutering”. Very effective in removing all sexual desires. We lock them up, give them psychotherapy until they agree to take the drugs, release them. No repeat offenders so far.

Airhead, you may consider this an “antiAmerican rant” if you like you ignorant POS ***hole.

"chemical neutering" has been offered as an alternative punishment for serial sex offenders in America provided the offender has the option- as much as a child molester is loathsome I'm reluctant to resort to such barbaric tatics of around the clock interrorigations until the offender "agrees" to take the chemical casteration option.

Frankly I'm surprised teh hear Europe even has sex crimes- according to everything I read here Europe is a Shangri-La where there is no crime, no guns, no want for basic necessities and no predjicuce.

And no, your statement wasn't an anti American rant, your statement was an anti American dig like you are saying "heh heh, back where I live we deal with this problem better" like you are all superior to us...and that is what, reading between the lines, you- and your ilk- are saying "we are superior to you." And that is how every one of your posts are.

"We are better than you. We are morally superior to you."

It's how it reads to me, GS- it's the way you, and many others, come across, especially lately. You need to lay off the hate, quit the namecalling and remember we're all just folks.

Airhead · « **Reply #19 on:** March 25, 2005, 09:24:34 PM »

Quote

Originally posted by GScholz
What labour would they do 500 miles from nowhere?

Seriously though, we lock these guys up until they have served their sentence + what we call “security”. Basically they’re locked up in a ward until they are deemed rehabilitated and safe to release. For the real psycho rapist-murderers this means they’ll live out their lives in some psycho-ward.

Unfortunately our sentacing laws favor the recently convicted, so there's no indeterminate sentance provision for rehabilition- there is only a sentance of an amount of time, and that puts predators back on the streets. The argument was indeterminate sentances were considered "arbitrary" and "potentially discriminatory" and that effectively pushed rehabilitation out of the judicial system.

vorticon · « **Reply #20 on:** March 25, 2005, 09:37:44 PM »

Quote

Originally posted by GScholz
So you mean you don’t institutionalize mentally ill people that are a threat to themselves or others? I think you are mistaken. If you are not, then there’s you whole problem right there.

sure we do, problem is, these monsters end up in a prison for a set amount of time then let back on the streets, they dont get sent to the nuthouse...

Maverick · « **Reply #21 on:** March 25, 2005, 09:50:20 PM »

Vidkun,

Under American law, and many thanks to the ACLU, a person that is menatally ill MUST be declared a danger to themselves or others before they can be committed. A rather liberal (not political conotation here) bias towards the individual in question is rendered to determine if the individual is safe to release. Absent a court declaration with a determination of danger to self or others the person CANNOT be kept against their will.

An offender cannot be required to submit to castration, chemical or otherwise in this country. It is considered cruel and unusual punishment and unconstitutional.

Under this system once the sentence is served they must be released. It has been the experiance of the legal system in this country that pedophiles are among the worst of repeat offenders. However once served they cannot continue to be held they must be released and not reincarcerated until they offend again. Once released legally presumed innocent until proven guilty.

Airhead · « **Reply #22 on:** March 25, 2005, 09:55:55 PM »

Quote

Originally posted by GScholz
Well, then there’s you whole problem right there.

What, that we can't arbitrarily imprison people to inderterminate sentances?

I prefer our system- the only tweaking it needs is to adopt a zero tolorance stance and get pedophiles off the street.

As for the rest of your post, well- I know you want me, and my gate only swings out, if you know what I mean.

Maverick · « **Reply #23 on:** March 25, 2005, 10:01:14 PM »

Quote

Originally posted by GScholz
Well Benedict, there’s your problem right there (getting tired of repeating myself).

Pity you don't like the legal system or government we have here, but then again it's not your problem or concern. If it really bothers you feel free to refrain from the bbs. The door out is open.

JB73 · « **Reply #24 on:** March 25, 2005, 10:19:52 PM »

Quote

Originally posted by GScholz
So you mean you don’t institutionalize mentally ill people that are a threat to themselves or others? I think you are mistaken. If you are not, then there’s you whole problem right there.

GS sir i am truly sorry to get into a political dicission with you....

"mentally ill" yes,

"sex offenders" no

the MF liberals say "they have rights" as any other human and what not. it is a bunch of sympathizing BULL S###

these bastards are NEVER rehabiliated in prision (bacically a house to hone criminal skills in the US, overpopulated by over 3 times in most cases)

we have a thing callen "NIMBY" here (Not In My Back Yard)

sadly i have yet to meet a conservative who says "dont build a prision here!!"

it is always the liberal "my community must be safe" ******* that stop prision developments.

yesterday we had 3 guys here in wisconsin try and break out of prision.... 1 a double murderer, one passed bad checkes, one assulted someone.

see somethign wrong with that picture? someone who passed bad checks is housed in a room with a double murderer.

there needs to be "isolation" prisions, for serious offenders, like murdereres, rapists, child molesters and the like. they TOOK AWAY the rights of the person the commited the crime against, they shoudl have NO RIGHTS!

oops ACLU did i say that? <<<<<<>>>>>>>>> you ACLU, go ahead and support flag burners / rapists / child molesters who kill the babies, and murdereres... they OBVIOUSLY deserve cable TV, and their onw phone, when hard working people i know dont have either of them.

bottom line, there are people in this world who DONT get "rightes" sadly it will NEVER be that way with the bleeding heart liberals: "give them a chance" whining MO FO's

i only hope everyone who voted for kerry has their child raped and murdered by a local registered sex offender, maybe THEN they'll see where that baby BS liberal agenda will get them

Airhead · « **Reply #25 on:** March 25, 2005, 10:21:10 PM »

Quote

Originally posted by GScholz
So you’d rather give them life in prison without a chance of parole then give them an “indeterminate sentence” with the possibility of conditional release? I think I know what the defendant would want.

In the case of pedophiles then HELL yea, I'd rather have them warehoused for life without possibility of parole at the first offense.

And I don't care what the convicted (you said defendant) wants. We don't serve tea and crumpets at a sentacing. We handcuff them and haul them off to prison.

Airhead · « **Reply #26 on:** March 25, 2005, 10:35:13 PM »

Quote

Originally posted by JB73
GS sir i am truly sorry to get into a political dicission wiht you....

"mentally ill" yes,

"sex offenders" no

the MF liberals say "they have rights" as any other human and what not. it is a bunch of sympathizing BU##S###

these bastards are NEVER rehabiliated in prision (bacically a house to hone criminal skills in the US, overpopulated by over 3 times in most cases)

we have a thing callen "NIMBY" here (Not In My Back Yard)

sadly i have yet to meet a conservative who says "dont build a prision here!!"

it is always the liberal "my community must be safe" ******* that stop prision developments.

yesterday we had 3 guys here in wisconsin try and break out of prision.... 1 a double murderer, one passed bad checkes, one assulted someone.

see somethign wrong with that picture? someone who passed bad checks is housed in a room with a double murderer.

there needs to be "isolation" prisions, for serious offenders, like murdereres, rapists, child molesters and the like. they TOOK AWAY the rights of the person the commited the crime against, they shoudl have NO RIGHTS!

i only hope everyone who voted for kerry has their child raped and murdered, maybe THEN they'll see where that baby BS liberal agenda will get them

bottom line, there are people in this world who DONT get "rightes" sadly it will NEVER be that way with the bleeding heart liberals: "give them a chance" whining mot*** fu*****

i only hope everyone who voted for kerry has their child raped and murdered, maybe THEN they'll see where that baby BS liberal agenda will get them

Now this is my favorite part....

"i only hope everyone who voted for kerry has their child raped and murdered, maybe THEN they'll see where that baby BS liberal agenda will get them"

Especially in a thread about- Ta Da- child rape.

Welp, thank you for your sentiments JB. I hope thay can balance your meds but dude, I don't think there's a cure for JB Flu. You need to eat poison so it doesn't spread.

JB73 · « **Reply #27 on:** March 25, 2005, 10:43:39 PM »

sir, but i can not help the feeling of hate i have for these bastards...

but i think you missed my point.

in america they are not "mentally ill" and not put into a rehab facility. (though we agree to disagree here, "rehab" will simpally NTO work for them anyway)

they are plain old criminals, and the ACLU will not let us punish them according to their crimes.

anyone for that matter, all prisioners in the US are given free cable TV, phones, salaries for work done, and everything some NON convict citizens do not have. the ACLU and other originizatons demand it, and the government folds under pressure to it.

the republican party has been faithfully "hard on crime" up to our president who was governer of a state with the most exicutions of all states. too bad a president is only a figure head, and can not impliment country wide policies regarding these matters.

hel here in wisconsin jefery dahlmer (ate 18 people and had sex with the bodies) was not "insaine" and went to regular prision. thankfully he got lynched and is dead dead dead.

to bad for the parents of these 2 little girls in the past month.... if only there was a way to keep these monsters off the street.

one can dream can;t he?

Maverick · « **Reply #28 on:** March 25, 2005, 10:48:37 PM »

Quote

Originally posted by GScholz
No Benedict, it is not my problem and I don’t really care what you do. I do however like to debate the issue. If you don’t like that then feel free to refrain from the BBS. The door out is open.

Problem is, you don't debate. You ridicule, pontificate and berate. That is not a debate. Postulating an alternative or even a simple discussion asking questions is an arguement or discourse if you like. You don't do that, that is why you get the responses here that you see. It tends to make anything you say sound jaded and therefore inconsequential.

JB73 · « **Reply #29 on:** March 25, 2005, 10:49:33 PM »

oh so airhead (fitting name) you support the release of molesters who have "paid their debt"?

oh wait, you think they should rot huh? let's see what the political party you agree too says about this....

you vote people into office who demand these monsters be set free and be given a chance in the local community, yet condem the actions of the monster who was let loose in your community.

talk about ******* hypocrate.

look into a mirror, ill bet you see a black void where your soul used to be.