Originally posted by Steve
mistaken intentions? huh?
Yes, we should have waited to see if he indeed had a bomb(s) in the suitcases. We should have waited to see if he detonated them, it's the only way to be sure he was a bad guy.
Clarify... he was just standing there, and when some security people asked him what he was doing, he indicated that he didn't speak english, if I read correctly.
Are you suggesting that it is appropriate to tackle people for not speaking english? Or was there something else he did that was threatening? As far as I know, it's not illegal to have two suitcases. If it was, everyone in the aviation biz would have died of anxiety decades ago.
Explain again what specifically he did that made being tackled/arrested appropriate? The news seems to be a bit sparse on the subject.
What we know:
1. He had two suitcases.
2. He was standing in front of the capitol looking out at the view.
3. He didn't speak english.
I've been guilty of #1 and #2, and I'm not so great at #3 if you believe my report cards from school.
Everyone seems to have convicted him already without any evidence. Which of you thought the police officer in the $2 Best Buy case was an idiot when he incited '9/11' as part of why they hand-cuffed the innocent guy for 3 hours? Any overlap between you and those yelling for blood from what may just be a tourist?