Author Topic: The new cockpit framing  (Read 1687 times)

Offline TDeacon

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1553
The new cockpit framing
« Reply #30 on: April 20, 2005, 12:21:50 PM »

Offline Bodhi

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 8698
The new cockpit framing
« Reply #31 on: April 22, 2005, 02:02:18 AM »
Quote
Originally posted by Nath_____
That's awesome.  This will be the only air-worthy original Fw 190.  I wonder where it will be flown?


That is incorrect.

FHC has an original FW190A5 that is about ready to take to the air.
I regret doing business with TD Computer Systems.

Offline Crumpp

  • Parolee
  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3671
The new cockpit framing
« Reply #32 on: April 22, 2005, 06:40:21 AM »
Last I heard WNr 0 151 227 is not going to be restored with a BMW801 engine.  It will certainly look authentic from the outside though!

All the best,

Crumpp
« Last Edit: April 22, 2005, 06:50:07 AM by Crumpp »

Offline GScholz

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 8910
The new cockpit framing
« Reply #33 on: April 22, 2005, 06:55:44 AM »
Crumpp, does your foundation own Weiße Eins or are you restoring it for a Norwegian museum? I know we have a 190 in Texas for engine restoration (IIRC).
"With the first link, the chain is forged. The first speech censored, the first thought forbidden, the first freedom denied, chains us all irrevocably."

Offline Crumpp

  • Parolee
  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3671
The new cockpit framing
« Reply #34 on: April 22, 2005, 07:17:51 AM »
We own "Weisse Eins" and several other FW-190's.  "Black 3" is being restored for a Norwegian Museum.

All the best,

Crumpp

Offline GScholz

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 8910
The new cockpit framing
« Reply #35 on: April 22, 2005, 11:41:41 AM »
Thanks.
"With the first link, the chain is forged. The first speech censored, the first thought forbidden, the first freedom denied, chains us all irrevocably."

Offline Bodhi

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 8698
The new cockpit framing
« Reply #36 on: April 22, 2005, 12:05:00 PM »
crump, whats your email?
I regret doing business with TD Computer Systems.

Offline Crumpp

  • Parolee
  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3671
The new cockpit framing
« Reply #37 on: April 22, 2005, 03:08:07 PM »
email addy removed.
« Last Edit: April 22, 2005, 07:58:06 PM by Crumpp »

Offline DREDIOCK

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 17775
The new cockpit framing
« Reply #38 on: April 25, 2005, 08:32:14 AM »
I hereby dub the FW A8 unflyable in its current form.
And its not so much the side supports (which I still think are just a tad bit too thick) as much as it is the brace on top that kills the view. Unless something is right in front of you or right above you. you cant see watermelon no matter the head position.


Again I find it impossable to beleive that the visability was THAT bad.

The dementions may be accurate but I dont think the pilots perspective is.
Death is no easy answer
For those who wish to know
Ask those who have been before you
What fate the future holds
It ain't pretty

Offline GtoRA2

  • Persona Non Grata
  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 8339
The new cockpit framing
« Reply #39 on: April 25, 2005, 08:49:46 PM »
Cant you just move the head around on your own?

Offline DREDIOCK

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 17775
The new cockpit framing
« Reply #40 on: April 26, 2005, 08:18:43 AM »
Quote
Originally posted by GtoRA2
Cant you just move the head around on your own?


Yes but no matter what position you put the head the view doesnt improve at all
Death is no easy answer
For those who wish to know
Ask those who have been before you
What fate the future holds
It ain't pretty

Offline GtoRA2

  • Persona Non Grata
  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 8339
The new cockpit framing
« Reply #41 on: April 26, 2005, 11:07:24 AM »
Hmmm even if you move in closer to the site?

Offline MANDO

  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 549
The new cockpit framing
« Reply #42 on: April 26, 2005, 11:49:26 AM »
Quote
Originally posted by GtoRA2
Hmmm even if you move in closer to the site?


Are you systematically asking, or have you already tested that? Just try it, and then try to track an enemy that is at your hi 12, turning with you...

I vote for the previous canopy frontal framing or similar with the current cockpit (control panel) system. From outside, the plane would look just the same except closer than 50 yards (even at 50 yards it looks the same).

Of course, in combat if would look the same even at 1 yard, no one looks at the frontal framming of the enemy plane during a HO.

Offline DREDIOCK

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 17775
The new cockpit framing
« Reply #43 on: April 26, 2005, 07:45:39 PM »
Yes even with my head closer to the site.

I dont see what the inside frame has to do with the way the plane looks on the outside. Arent they two different peices of artwork?
Death is no easy answer
For those who wish to know
Ask those who have been before you
What fate the future holds
It ain't pretty

Offline TexMurphy

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1488
The new cockpit framing
« Reply #44 on: April 27, 2005, 02:53:10 AM »
Personally I dont agree that its gone from bad to worse.

The Ki84 framing is a little thick but ok, biggest problem I have with this cockpit is that the frameing looks totally 2D. The metal looks to be razor thin.

Cockpit Rating: Ok.

The P38s rock. They imho are spot on after the move of the armour glass of the G model.

Cockpit Rating: Good.

190s I have to agree here they HAVE too thick framing. So thick that it basicly makes it horribly bad.

Cockpit Rating: Bad.

Tex