Originally posted by Krusty
I agree with Karnak. Every source I've ever read has said the 210 was a flop. The wing was redesigned in the 410 to correct design flaws in the 210 design.
Perhaps you and Karnak should read some serious source on the 210/410, not just the William Green and co. stuff... ie. read Patrick/Mankau, by far the best source. Anyway, as for Karnak every single LW was a 'catasptrope' without exception, with such amount of bias I would not give much weight to his words. He is just playing his usual tunes.
FYI, the original 210A series (354 built, but only 183 was accepted) was indeed troublesome, but was called back, and redesigned, and rebuilt into Me 210A-1(lang) standard with lenghtened fuselage, and leading edge slats. Same airframe as the 410, but with the different engines (DB 601s). There were 182 of the early, troublesome Me 210A-1s accepted by the LW - followed by the 212 redesigned Me 210A-1(lang) which corrected these flaws; 169 of them were rebuilt A-1s. The 'long' 210As were followed by 272 210Ca-1s, 'corrected' airframe but with DB 605As.
So, basically, out of the 838 Me 210s built, only 354 were 'troublesome/catashropic(TM of Karnak)'.. ca 40%, but half of that 40% was re-built and corrected.
Many 210As were then re-engined with DB 603, and along with the newly produced planes, they become the Me 410 A and B, a total of 1010 Me 410s were accepted by the LW.
BTW, the 210/410 was no longer intended to the same multirole heavy fighter ('Zestorer') as the 110. The concept was changed, and the 210/410 was intended as a 'Kampfzestorer', a plane primarly for
fast bomber roles, but with mulitrole capabilities.
So, basically, the 110 was a fighter in the 1st place and a bomber only as 2nd, the 210/410 was a bomber in the first place that could also be employed as a heavy fighter. As in the latter role, with it`s heavy armament it was rather successfull and well suited against heavy bombers - that is, until escort fighters appeared which outmatched this larger plane.