« previous next »
Pages: [1] 2   Go Down

Author Topic: Finnish 109  (Read 1324 times)

Offline agent 009

  • Parolee
  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 368
Finnish 109
« on: April 28, 2005, 09:50:21 PM »
« Last Edit: April 28, 2005, 10:02:13 PM by agent 009 »
Logged

Offline Wmaker

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 5743
      • Lentolaivue 34 website
Finnish 109
« Reply #1 on: April 29, 2005, 04:03:37 AM »
Nothing to do with a knockoff, it's a completely independent design...only thing similar is the powerplant...
Logged
Wmaker
Lentolaivue 34

Thank you for the Brewster HTC!

Offline Charge

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3414
Finnish 109
« Reply #2 on: April 29, 2005, 06:21:27 AM »
It has a slight resemblance to LaGG-3, doesn't it?

-C+
Logged
"When you wish upon a falling star, your dreams can come true. Unless it's really a giant meteor hurtling to the earth which will destroy all life. Then you're pretty much screwed no matter what you wish for. Unless of course, it's death by meteorite."

Offline agent 009

  • Parolee
  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 368
Finnish 109
« Reply #3 on: April 29, 2005, 09:41:18 PM »
It has same scoops, same upsidown motor concept. same armament. So it is to a degree a knockoff, an upgrade perhaps a better word.
Logged

Offline GScholz

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 8910
Finnish 109
« Reply #4 on: April 30, 2005, 07:29:01 AM »
Quote
Originally posted by agent 009
It has same scoops, same upsidown motor concept. same armament. So it is to a degree a knockoff, an upgrade perhaps a better word.



So does this, but if you call it a 109 knock-off you might upset the Spit dweebs :D

Logged
"With the first link, the chain is forged. The first speech censored, the first thought forbidden, the first freedom denied, chains us all irrevocably."

Offline agent 009

  • Parolee
  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 368
Finnish 109
« Reply #5 on: April 30, 2005, 10:42:50 AM »
Um not exactly. not same scoops, no armament.
Logged

Offline GScholz

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 8910
Finnish 109
« Reply #6 on: April 30, 2005, 11:00:50 AM »
The Finnish fighter does NOT have the same oil cooler and radiator scoops as the 109. It has the same engine and prop. So in your mind the Spitfire is a knock-off of the Hurricane? Same engine and prop. Same armament.
Logged
"With the first link, the chain is forged. The first speech censored, the first thought forbidden, the first freedom denied, chains us all irrevocably."

Offline agent 009

  • Parolee
  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 368
Finnish 109
« Reply #7 on: April 30, 2005, 12:03:04 PM »
If you have a look at the photo of finnish plane you can see scoops are same placement & design as 109.
Logged

Offline spitfiremkv

  • Parolee
  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1135
Finnish 109
« Reply #8 on: April 30, 2005, 01:01:43 PM »
109 rocks.
3rd rate countries can't copy 109 well-see Hispanos, Avias variants of the 109.
so this finnish fighter prolly sucks bellybutton too.
Logged

Offline agent 009

  • Parolee
  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 368
Finnish 109
« Reply #9 on: April 30, 2005, 09:15:11 PM »
Actually no, it could outclimb & outmaeuver G-6. the ones made in Czeclosovakia & Spain did not have right props or motors, but the Finnish one did.
Logged

Offline spitfiremkv

  • Parolee
  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1135
Finnish 109
« Reply #10 on: April 30, 2005, 09:20:28 PM »
same engine and prop, but larger wing...
that wing had to be draggier and heavier than that of the 109.
they say it had the same speed as a G6, but I cal BS.


here's some links that actually work :)
http://frhewww.physik.uni-freiburg.de/~jaensch/109/wvl.htm
http://www.samoloty.ow.pl/str135.htm
« Last Edit: April 30, 2005, 09:23:20 PM by spitfiremkv »
Logged

Offline agent 009

  • Parolee
  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 368
Finnish 109
« Reply #11 on: April 30, 2005, 09:21:28 PM »
Spit had larger wing, & it was not heavier & draggier.
Logged

Offline spitfiremkv

  • Parolee
  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1135
Finnish 109
« Reply #12 on: April 30, 2005, 09:29:21 PM »
spit had an elliptical wing. that's different.

Also, I am a little confused. there's another Finnish fighter called Myrsky, has a radial engine but the landing gear arrangement looks a lot like that of the Pyörremyrsky, I wonder if the wing is the same.
Logged

Offline agent 009

  • Parolee
  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 368
Finnish 109
« Reply #13 on: April 30, 2005, 10:08:13 PM »
Still bigger.
Logged

Offline spitfiremkv

  • Parolee
  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1135
Finnish 109
« Reply #14 on: April 30, 2005, 10:09:58 PM »
but elliptical. that's the best wing, cause it has minimal induced drag.
Logged
Pages: [1] 2   Go Up
« previous next »