Author Topic: Freakonomics  (Read 1669 times)

Offline midnight Target

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 15114
Freakonomics
« on: April 30, 2005, 06:42:25 PM »
Anyone read this yet? The most startling part of the book claims that the one event that had the greatest impact on reduced crime rates is..

Roe v Wade

Here is a review.

http://www.englishrules.com/archives/2005/freakonomics.php

Offline NUKE

  • Persona Non Grata
  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 8599
      • Arizona Greens
Re: Freakonomics
« Reply #1 on: April 30, 2005, 06:49:37 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by midnight Target
Anyone read this yet? The most startling part of the book claims that the one event that had the greatest impact on reduced crime rates is..


Yeah, if you are an idiot maybe you could view crime as related to abortion. I view abortion as a crime, so crime has only increased since R v W

Offline Holden McGroin

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 8591
Freakonomics
« Reply #2 on: April 30, 2005, 06:53:25 PM »
Makes you rethink capital punishment eh?
Holden McGroin LLC makes every effort to provide accurate and complete information. Since humor, irony, and keen insight may be foreign to some readers, no warranty, expressed or implied is offered. Re-writing this disclaimer cost me big bucks at the lawyer’s office!

Offline GRUNHERZ

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 13413
Freakonomics
« Reply #3 on: April 30, 2005, 07:08:04 PM »
That seal it! We should open as many abortion clinics as possible in high crime areas!

Offline NUKE

  • Persona Non Grata
  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 8599
      • Arizona Greens
Freakonomics
« Reply #4 on: April 30, 2005, 07:11:08 PM »
Personal attack
« Last Edit: May 02, 2005, 01:22:28 PM by Skuzzy »

Offline Tumor

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 4272
      • Wait For It
Freakonomics
« Reply #5 on: April 30, 2005, 07:28:16 PM »
Dead babies do not grow up to be criminals? :rolleyes:
"Dogfighting is useless"  :Erich Hartmann

Offline Holden McGroin

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 8591
Freakonomics
« Reply #6 on: April 30, 2005, 07:32:07 PM »
Yeah Tumor, the author's rationale is that unwanted children grow up in less than ideal circumstances and therefore tend toward criminal behavior.  

So when you kill 'em early, problem solved.
Holden McGroin LLC makes every effort to provide accurate and complete information. Since humor, irony, and keen insight may be foreign to some readers, no warranty, expressed or implied is offered. Re-writing this disclaimer cost me big bucks at the lawyer’s office!

Offline Sandman

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 17620
Freakonomics
« Reply #7 on: April 30, 2005, 09:21:01 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by Tumor
Dead babies do not grow up to be criminals? :rolleyes:


Dead unwanted babies do not grow up to be criminals.
sand

Offline NUKE

  • Persona Non Grata
  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 8599
      • Arizona Greens
Freakonomics
« Reply #8 on: April 30, 2005, 09:22:06 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by Sandman
Dead unwanted babies do not grow up to be criminals.


"unwanted" babies ?

Offline midnight Target

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 15114
Freakonomics
« Reply #9 on: April 30, 2005, 09:50:28 PM »
HArd to argue with the numbers, but it turns out .. Nuke, that the author might agree with you. This of course doesn't change the facts.

From an interview (Levitt is the author)
Quote
Levitt: I have gotten a whole lot of hate mail on the abortion issue (as much from the left as from the right, amazingly). What I try to tell anyone who will listen -- few people will listen when the subject is abortion -- is that our findings on abortion and crime have almost nothing to say about public policy on abortion. If abortion is murder as pro-life advocates say, then a few thousand less homicides is nothing compared to abortion itself. If a woman's right to choose is sacrosanct, then utilitarian arguments are inconsequential. Mainly, I think the results on abortion imply that we should do the best we can to try to make sure kids who are born are wanted and loved. And it turns out that is something just about everyone can agree on.

Offline Sandman

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 17620
Freakonomics
« Reply #10 on: April 30, 2005, 10:09:01 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by NUKE
"unwanted" babies ?


Believe it or not

really... it happens
sand

Offline Toad

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 18415
Freakonomics
« Reply #11 on: April 30, 2005, 10:09:36 PM »
If we killed everyone, there'd be no more crime!
If ye love wealth better than liberty, the tranquility of servitude than the animated contest of freedom, go from us in peace. We ask not your counsels or arms. Crouch down and lick the hands which feed you. May your chains sit lightly upon you, and may posterity forget that you were our countrymen!

Offline Gunslinger

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 10084
Freakonomics
« Reply #12 on: April 30, 2005, 10:44:31 PM »
Quote
Levitt: I have gotten a whole lot of hate mail on the abortion issue (as much from the left as from the right, amazingly). What I try to tell anyone who will listen -- few people will listen when the subject is abortion -- is that our findings on abortion and crime have almost nothing to say about public policy on abortion. If abortion is murder as pro-life advocates say, then a few thousand less homicides is nothing compared to abortion itself. If a woman's right to choose is sacrosanct, then utilitarian arguments are inconsequential. Mainly, I think the results on abortion imply that we should do the best we can to try to make sure kids who are born are wanted and loved. And it turns out that is something just about everyone can agree on.


woa that's way to much common sense for a political argument    ;)

Offline Tumor

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 4272
      • Wait For It
Freakonomics
« Reply #13 on: April 30, 2005, 10:58:04 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by Gunslinger
woa that's way to much common sense for a political argument    ;)


No no no!!  More dead ones means less you have to want!
"Dogfighting is useless"  :Erich Hartmann

Offline Seagoon

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2396
      • http://www.providencepca.com
Freakonomics
« Reply #14 on: April 30, 2005, 11:19:03 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by Sandman
Believe it or not

really... it happens


Just want to make sure I understand the underlying logic here.

They are better off dead than abandoned?  

Has anyone told the grown-up foundlings?

- SEAGOON

PS: Hey, wait a minute, why limit the benefits when we could eliminate crime entirely simply by killing everyone!
« Last Edit: April 30, 2005, 11:30:18 PM by Seagoon »
SEAGOON aka Pastor Andy Webb
"We have no government armed with power capable of contending with human passions unbridled by morality and religion... Our Constitution was made only for a moral and religious people. It is wholly inadequate to the government of any other." - John Adams