Pongo pretty much said it all. And come to think of it, summed it up pretty nicely too.
Agent009, take the time to put your ego, etc aside and reread this.
(Pongo said) You throw out one lined hair brained concepts for german domination based on changed stratagy and then dont like it when people try to explain the real constraints that were in place for the Germans in ww2.
If you want positive discussion then put another 20 minutes into describing how your scenario is possible and what assumptions are inherant in your scenario and how those assumptions impact the scenario itself. (End quote)
This is the heart of the matter right here in a nutshell.
Yes we can discuss "what if" as regards to WWII. I've been thinking about the same thing in regards to Pearl Harbour for years.
Put you have to put everything into perspective. The Japanese can't take Pearl without robbing resources needed elsewhere.
Same holds for Germany. They had limited resources, and were surrounded by enemys.
Perhaps Hitler could have waited to attack Russia and worked on England instead. Fact remains he did NOT have the ships, the landing craft, the amphibious vehicles, or the WILL to do so.
Actually Hitler was lucky to have gotten Norway, England was just a bit slow reading the signs & reacting. A week difference could have seen major changes. England might have gained a stronger foothold, and put the majority of WWII battles being fought in Norway.
That was "Close" enough in terms of timing, and forces involved that it could have gone either way.
Germany did at one point have England on the ropes. The LW was attacking the Brit Airfields and Comand and control was loosing effectiveness rapidly. Then they shifted their attention to Radar & London, gave the RAF a chance to bounce back again.
Now THAT is a decision that could have changed the war.
Granted England suffered under the Blitz, but do you really think churchill would have surrendered?
"We will fight them on the beaches, etc"
But just to say "England surrendered" is unrealistic, and brings nothing to the table to discuss.