Author Topic: The Continued Erosion of the 2nd Amendment (Read 895 times)

Chairboy · « **Reply #15 on:** May 09, 2005, 06:38:23 PM »

FT_Animal, why not apply that same standard to flying? Flyign a simulator is so 'pathedic' (as you put it) compared to the real thing, perhaps that should be outlawed as well?

john9001 · « **Reply #16 on:** May 09, 2005, 06:45:29 PM »

Quote

Originally posted by Torque
the arizona border would be a good place to set up remote firing stations, no?

now that would be good.

"hunting"? but you get no recoil, no noise, no smoke,and you don't get to gut the deer and drag it out of the woods, what fun is that?
i do most of my "hunting" at the super mkt....BAMM, i'll take that steak

Airhead · « **Reply #17 on:** May 09, 2005, 06:58:00 PM »

Quote

Originally posted by FT_Animal

If you can't get your butt out into the woods and do it yourself on the spot you have no justification to hunt at all. Hunting is about more then firing on an animal, it's called sporting.

I see this technology as finally giving disabled people, who otherwise can't get thier butts in the woods, a chance to enjoy hunting too.

What if we allowed this technology on pests like gophers instead of big game animals like bears? Would that be OK, or do you hate disabled people so much you don't want them shooting rodents even?

john9001 · « **Reply #18 on:** May 09, 2005, 07:10:46 PM »

Quote

Originally posted by Airhead
I see this technology as finally giving disabled people, who otherwise can't get thier butts in the woods, a chance to enjoy hunting too.

there is a reason they are called disabled.

Shamus · « **Reply #19 on:** May 09, 2005, 07:25:46 PM »

lol, I think I will hire some guy to go out and shoot a lion for me and send me a picture of "what I got" hehe

shamus

bustr · « **Reply #20 on:** May 09, 2005, 07:26:50 PM »

There are Hunting Orgs that will help a disabled person into the feild and hold the firearm if neccessary while the disabled person pulls a finger, bites a switch or wiggles a toe to toggel the trigger mechanism.

So Airhead are you attempting to label FT_Animal a spigot or sumptin with your impassioned emotional plea to the jury? I guess next every farmer in the U.S. will have to put in wheel chair access to their pastures and crop feilds so the disabled can have equal access to hunt........................t he "hate","bigot", or "racist" words, fantastic verbal switchs to control dialog and people. Like littel bags of burning stuff no one wants to get near or stomp on.......any kind of an answer is a lose lose for the target.

Airhead · « **Reply #21 on:** May 09, 2005, 07:37:40 PM »

bustr, once we legislate against segments of our population we suffer as a society. Nowhere in the 2nd amendment does it say "the right of the able bodied," it says "we the people."

Think about that.

Holden McGroin · « **Reply #22 on:** May 09, 2005, 08:04:05 PM »

The disabled can keep and bare arms. Nowhere in the constitution does it say they can hunt. Otherwise the Pacific Crest Trail wouldhave to be handicap accessable.

Sandman · « **Reply #23 on:** May 09, 2005, 09:15:05 PM »

Quote

Originally posted by Holden McGroin
I see no erosion in the 2nd amendment witgh this law however stupid it may be.

True enough, but it's a good hook.

I must say, Airhead makes a fine wingman.

Flit · « **Reply #24 on:** May 09, 2005, 09:15:44 PM »

Quote

Originally posted by Holden McGroin
The disabled can keep and bare arms. Nowhere in the constitution does it say they can hunt. Otherwise the Pacific Crest Trail wouldhave to be handicap accessable.

What he said:aok

Flit · « **Reply #25 on:** May 09, 2005, 09:17:14 PM »

Quote

Originally posted by Airhead
amazing that some of you here are appaled at this, yet you're all for drone aircraft killing terrorists.

This comment is so asinine, I can't believe I'm responding to it:confused:

FT_Animal · « **Reply #26 on:** May 09, 2005, 09:37:00 PM »

Quote

Originally posted by Chairboy
FT_Animal, why not apply that same standard to flying? Flyign a simulator is so 'pathedic' (as you put it) compared to the real thing, perhaps that should be outlawed as well?

Yup lotta thought behind that response. I can tell.

You actually want me to reply to this, or would you like to think about it for a while?

They are two entirely different spectrums. But I'll let you figure it out.

FT_Animal · « **Reply #27 on:** May 09, 2005, 09:40:00 PM »

Quote

Originally posted by Airhead
I see this technology as finally giving disabled people, who otherwise can't get thier butts in the woods, a chance to enjoy hunting too.

What if we allowed this technology on pests like gophers instead of big game animals like bears? Would that be OK, or do you hate disabled people so much you don't want them shooting rodents even?

LOL, pleaze, either you're trolling for as stupid a response as I just got, or you ned to get off the drugs.

Point to me where I mentioned ANYTHING about disabled, or hate for that matter. Don't stream words into my mouth, I'm not as stupid as you wish.

FT_Animal · « **Reply #28 on:** May 09, 2005, 09:46:59 PM »

Quote

Originally posted by Airhead
bustr, once we legislate against segments of our population we suffer as a society. Nowhere in the 2nd amendment does it say "the right of the able bodied," it says "we the people."

Think about that.

lululululul,.. blahlalalalalalala.

Do you think about what you type? Have you considered seeking help for your dementia>?

We suffer as a society for allowing crapola stuff like this to even be considered.

FT_Animal · « **Reply #29 on:** May 09, 2005, 09:54:23 PM »

Why not just mount a motion detector on it so it fires as soon as ANYTHING steps in front of it?

I don't know why I even bother responding to these post, other then for shere ammusement.

I've heard rotting fungus on the bottum of a bejo ditch burp more intelligence then some in this thread.

But hey who am I ?