Originally posted by NUKE
Every country in every war has held prisoners and can legally do so. There are no trials, they are unlawful combatants who have been captured in battle. They can legally be held for the duration of the war.
The only difference between lawful and unlawful combatants is that lawful combatants can aslo be held without a trial for the duration of the conflict, but they have to be treated according to the Geneva conventions.
Nothing at all out of the ordinary is going on here. I don't understand what the big deal is about holding captured combatants.
I have to agree, 100%.
The problem is not everyone treats legal combatants by the rules set by the Geneva Convention.
Gitmo is not only holding combatants, but terroists, or those with ties to terrist organizations.
Why is there an up roar about this when thugs attack, hijack and behead civilians just trying to do a job? That is NOT the way to fight for freedom in any form of the word.
There are too many eyes on the wrong target! Gitmo is a holding pen for a lot of brutal individuals who want nothing more than to force the whole world back into the dark ages. You can cry for them if they get their way, only you will have to have approval first.