Originally posted by Ack-Ack
Over all the L is the better of the three. Having said that, I myself prefer the J as it was the historical ride of the 479th Fighter Group before the 8th AAF stuck its collective heads up their tulips and replaced them with the P-51D.
I'm also like Savage and use the J as my primary fighter and the L for attack sorties.
The G is just fun to fly.
ack-ack
The J just doesn't cut it as an attack ride. The rocket tubes are a drag, literally, and the lack of dive flaps makes it difficult to bomb from altitude at speed. It can be done, don't get me wrong, but I just don't do it.
I like the light feel of the J for fighter work, although I miss the fast roll rate at speed, and the dive flaps (I use them like a pilot from the 55th FG 8th AF told me too) of the L model. If you fight at medium or lower speeds, the lack of aileron boost doesn't hurt the J. And it has a light enough feel you don't notice the dive flaps not being there except in a terminal dive, and if you know how to handle it you can pull out anyway.
I am certain that the use of the J for an almost exclusively fighter role, and by the better P-38 sticks, skews the stats considerably.
Or maybe the reverse could be said, the average dump truck driver using the L model as an attack ride in the suicide mode skews the stats the other way.
As to the G model, I KNOW that most average or worse pilots take it up ONCE, and never again, due to the lack of WEP, roll rate at high speed, and the lack of dive flaps. But the good P-38 sticks will use it to beat average pilots in late war planes like a drum. I've SEEN good P-38 pilots soundly thrash late war planes in a G model, even when outnumbered and at a speed/alt/E disadvantage. They make the G look good. I should fly it more, it would likely help my skills improve.