Originally posted by Ack-Ack
Don't confuse climb rate with vertical performance. Just because a plane can climb better than another, doesn't quite equate also being better in the vertical. The Spitfire 14 bleeds E quicker than the P-38 in the vertical and the only hope the Spit 14 has if they want to play the vertical game is to make sure they had a significan E advantage to begin with to negate the P-38 better vertical performance.
ack-ack
I have tested every fighter in the game for both power-off and power-on zoom climb.
It appears that HTC has indeed modeled mass into the equation. Power-off zoom climb always goes to the heavier aircraft. Power-on zooms demonstrate that mass often offsets a power disadvantage.
A Spit14 will not zoom higher than a P-38 if they start Co-E. Neither will a 109G-10. In fact, the La-7 falls behind all three.
Three of the better zoom climbers are the Tempest, F4U-4 and P-47D-40. All are relative heavy weights with enormous power.
Another trainer and I were furballing with he in a Ki-84 and me in a P-38G. Approximately Co-E, he went pure vertical. I followed and not only didn't lose ground, but zoomed right on by.
In a steady state climb, the Ki-84 wins easily. Not so in a pure vertical zoom, where the P-38s mass more than offsets the Ki-84's superior climb rate. If you are Co-E with your adversary, simply zoom climbing is not a good solution to your problem.
My regards,
Widewing