Author Topic: The Great Debate (imo)  (Read 1583 times)

Offline 1K3

  • Parolee
  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3449
The Great Debate (imo)
« on: June 30, 2005, 11:05:21 PM »
Is the costomizable 1st person view mode too gamey?

Offline BigR

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 950
The Great Debate (imo)
« Reply #1 on: June 30, 2005, 11:15:40 PM »
i dont think its gamey at all because in real life you would be able to move your head in all sorts of angles without even thinking about it.

(Just noticed you are from vegas...which part? If you dont mind me asking)

Offline Raptor

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 7577
The Great Debate (imo)
« Reply #2 on: June 30, 2005, 11:19:21 PM »
I've not even seen this debate before... so why is it the great debate?

Offline 1K3

  • Parolee
  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3449
The Great Debate (imo)
« Reply #3 on: June 30, 2005, 11:23:13 PM »
Silverado Ranch... South of LV

LV reminds me of how Los Angeles/Hollywood area (where i used to live a yr ago) looked like 10 yrs ago.

(what part of LV youi live in?)
« Last Edit: June 30, 2005, 11:30:30 PM by 1K3 »

Offline Kweassa

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 6425
The Great Debate (imo)
« Reply #4 on: July 01, 2005, 12:33:10 AM »
The 6views is a bit lenient tho.

 It shouldn't be as goddanged restricted as IL2/FB, but it shouldn't offer a "panoramic" six view either.

 Here's a mock-up on 6-views I did some time ago:




6-view, IL-2 style. Too restricted.



6-view, AH style. Flexible and reasonable, but very lenient



My take on "Realistic" 6-view.

Offline BigR

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 950
The Great Debate (imo)
« Reply #5 on: July 01, 2005, 01:57:18 AM »
ah i live near Buffalo and Lake Mead in the summerlin area...yes vegas is growing at an alarming rate, and it drives me insane. I need out of this place lol.

Offline Tilt

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 7358
      • FullTilt
The Great Debate (imo)
« Reply #6 on: July 01, 2005, 07:10:04 AM »
I think the problem is to recreate the peripheral zone............

I am not sure what angle of view we get but for sure its at least 90 degrees where as peripheral does take in as much as 130 IIRC.

Yet we see all of the 90 as if focused upon it..............


I think full vector Track IR is / could be the defining approach if not a VR helmet
Ludere Vincere

Offline BlauK

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 5091
      • http://www.virtualpilots.fi/LLv34/
The Great Debate (imo)
« Reply #7 on: July 02, 2005, 04:22:14 AM »
I happen to work with some sight related issues :)

The whole view of 2 eyes covers about  180 degs horizontally and 130 degs vertically. The focused sight covers only about 1,5-2,5 degs (foveal zone, used for reading etc.) but there is also a parafoveal zone of appx. 5 degs whic has some 50% of the accuracy of the foveal zone. Eyes move constantly from one point to another to be able to construct the view we think we see. The peripheral view is good for noticing movement which can then draw the attention and make someone move their eyeys there to check the cause of movement.

Most flight sim games have a max view of about 90 degs and of one eye only. We are practically half-blind in all these games :)


  BlauKreuz - Lentolaivue 34      


Offline Morpheus

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 10227
Re: The Great Debate (imo)
« Reply #8 on: July 02, 2005, 09:40:20 AM »
Quote
Originally posted by 1K3
Is the costomizable 1st person view mode too gamey?


Drugs are bad.
If you don't receive Jesus Christ, you don't receive the gift of righteousness.

Be A WARRIOR NOT A WORRIER!

Offline Jackal1

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 9092
Re: Re: The Great Debate (imo)
« Reply #9 on: July 02, 2005, 09:48:23 AM »
Quote
Originally posted by Morpheus
Drugs are bad.


  Oh, I don`t know about that. One time I picked up a really good batch of..........
............................ errrrrrr.........ummmmmmm.... ....

yea, yea. Drugs are bad.
Democracy is two wolves deciding on what to eat. Freedom is a well armed sheep protesting the vote.
------------------------------------------------------------------

Offline BTW

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1107
The Great Debate (imo)
« Reply #10 on: July 02, 2005, 10:18:59 AM »
God forbid a game be gamey:rolleyes:

Offline Kweassa

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 6425
The Great Debate (imo)
« Reply #11 on: July 02, 2005, 10:27:56 AM »
Well, it could use some improvement BTW :)
 
 Having no six view at all, like how IL2/FB done it, is clearly an overkill. Makes no sense at all. However, the good thing about Il2/FB was that the pilot is forced to check left rear and right rear sides individually - unlike AH where a single 6 view virtually gives out a panoramic view of the 5, 6, 7 O'c at the same time. (the so-called "Linda Blair" view..)

 It does help in increasing the intensity of combat maneuvering, and gives the gamers a taste of why having somebody behind your six was such a bad thing to happen.

Offline Octavius

  • Skinner Team
  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 6651
The Great Debate (imo)
« Reply #12 on: July 02, 2005, 01:36:57 PM »
The AH internal view system is huge.  I love it.  I've been spoiled with its flexibility; and because of that, I can't find peace in many other sims.

gamey?  I can't believe this topic needs to be discussed :)
octavius
Fat Drunk BasTards (forum)

"bastard coated bastards with bastard filling?  delicious!"
Guest of the ++Blue Knights++[/size]

Offline Jackal1

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 9092
The Great Debate (imo)
« Reply #13 on: July 02, 2005, 02:36:59 PM »
The view system is great. No need for a change.
Next subject.
Democracy is two wolves deciding on what to eat. Freedom is a well armed sheep protesting the vote.
------------------------------------------------------------------

Offline Kweassa

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 6425
The Great Debate (imo)
« Reply #14 on: July 02, 2005, 03:03:05 PM »
"Great", as in "comfortable".

 But that's not always good enough :)