For the Rommel partisans, a question:
I recall that during the time Rommel ran rampant, looking like a tactical genius, he was actually being guided by specific intelligence that revealed the Brit's plans in detail. These plans had been provided as a courtesy to the US miltary attache in Africa, who kindly forwarded them by radio in a code the germans had broken (rather than by diplomatic pouch).
Once this leak was ID'd and plugged, Rommel suddenly didnt look so invincable -- at least as I recall the timing.
He was a clearly an excellent commander who both gave and received loyalty from his troops. His attacks into France benefitted from the French army's lethargy and tactical mistakes; he effectively spanked the inexperienced US army in N Africa; his defense of Normandy was hindered by material and higher command.
Does he really deserve the best of all time moniker?