Author Topic: Zazen a frustrated NME  (Read 1567 times)

Offline JAWS2003

  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 361
Zazen a frustrated NME
« Reply #30 on: August 15, 2005, 11:41:31 AM »
At the moment of this happenings bishops were outnumbered two to one on the rook front.

Zazen's action denied the bish access to :
-one Aircraft Carrier
-one battle cruiser
-four destroyers
-bunch of maned guns of all caliber
-some hundred AI controlled AAA
-PT boats
-carrier fighters
--AND THE BLOODY LVT's with their ability to resuply a field

If AH cares about this game should kick this shameless, ignorant guy.:mad:
« Last Edit: August 15, 2005, 11:45:02 AM by JAWS2003 »

Offline killnu

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3056
Zazen a frustrated NME
« Reply #31 on: August 15, 2005, 11:45:41 AM »
"Zazen's action denied the bish access to :
-one Aircraft Carrier
-one battle cruiser
-four destroyers
-bunch of maned guns of all caliber
-some hundred AI controlled AAA
-PT boats
-carrier fighters
--AND THE BLOODY LVT's "

actually slick, he "denied" nothing to the bish, other than spawning the LVTs (with ability to resupply)on to beach...they could still spawn them, just had to drive some...they had the CV, cruiser, destroyers, all manned guns...etc....

he just denied them the exploit they were using, thats all.  and funny you left that off the list.
 
:aok
Karma, it follows you every where you go...

++The Blue Knights++

Offline Donzo

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2355
      • http://www.bops.us
Zazen a frustrated NME
« Reply #32 on: August 15, 2005, 11:55:01 AM »
Quote
Originally posted by Stang
The rooks had no chance to defend the port this way because the CV was away from it.  The bish did because it spawned there and was kept there for this purpose.  And on a final thought, whoever lead the bish mission to capture the port knew about the exploit and intended to use it to gain the foothold.


1. "The rooks had no chance to defend the port this way because the CV was away from it."
Hmmmm....I guess the Bish would have no way to defend the port until the CV was sunk either.  Happen to know the time between the port being taken and the cv being sunk?

2. "...whoever lead the bish mission to capture the port knew about the exploit and intended to use it to gain the foothold."
Foothold? Let's see, a port surrounded by NME bases.  Now is that a foothold?

No matter how you look at it two things are true:
1. Rooks not attacking P62 would have resulted in Bish not resupplying it.  Do you think we would have left the CV there if the port was not being attacked?  Did you think we would have used our mighty foothold by leaving the CV in port and launching a massive air raid from it?

2. Many Bish were tied up at P62.  Why not use that to your advantage and attack less defeneded bases?

Offline FALCONWING

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 943
Zazen a frustrated NME
« Reply #33 on: August 15, 2005, 11:56:23 AM »
Zazen has always been a classless wretch.  He gets on ch 200 every night and bashes bishops while he flies cherry picking sorties and avoids real fights.  So it is of no great suprise that he would purposefully cheat to hurt bishops despite the fact that at the time rooks had 200+ knights 180ish and bish were 100sh in numbers.

Here is the deal...the cv was of no use to the bish as an attack platform as long as the port was under attack.  If the bish were to have used the cv  then they would have lost it and the port..at best it was neutral and a type of gv warfare base which had the fun tanktown has.

There was no exploit..the old exploit was the ability to spawn in the water and drop supplies and have them take..that was fixed.

By keeping the cv close to port the bish could spawn on land and run them to the port.  There weas no auto supply being done.  the rook commanders had lacked the imagination to spawn their own hevy cannon lvt's to the port and prevent this from occurring.  They could have done this from the south and north airfields next to the base.  but this would have taken coordination and imagination...this was lacking...there were more rooks furballling then bringing ordinance...so be it.

I see the scorepotatos are defending this guy...it is always the way...

Zazen you make me laugh when you talk about "integrity of the game"  If there was one person who lacks integrity it would be you and stang.  Im sure many of us are poweful men in real life...we do not purposefully try to annoy or piss off people "just because we can"...every night i see the two of you using the "exploit" of a virtual world to be jerks.  this is a 2d version of a 3d world without any of the consequences of life.  I hope that high tec suprises me by taking action against you and that the moderators do more then just censor upset guys and actually move to make the game more enjoyable.  it would be nice to see ch200 become the and nice fight buffer it used to be in air warrior.  You two would be kicked out of a skating rink or bar if you behaved in there as you do here.
SECRET ANTI-BBS BULLY CLUB

Offline Donzo

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2355
      • http://www.bops.us
Zazen a frustrated NME
« Reply #34 on: August 15, 2005, 11:58:20 AM »
Quote
Originally posted by Zazen13
What it did that disrupted gameplay was allow a handfull of Bishop exploit bug abusers to unfairly tie up 50+ Rooks for 4+ hours that would have otherwise been beating the hell out of them elsewhere.


Why did 50+ rooks need to be tied up at P62?  Was it THAT important?  What exactly was the threat?

Offline SlapShot

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 9121
Zazen a frustrated NME
« Reply #35 on: August 15, 2005, 12:15:24 PM »
Zazen is now a "GOD" in my eyes ...

He pwned the pwners !!!

He out exploited the exploiters !!!

and he posted here for all to see.

And its just way too funny listening to the pwners and exploiters WHINE about Zazens actions.

For all you people calling this cheating ... get fediddlein' real.

Switching sides is not cheating nor is taking control of a CV after the switch ... exploiting a bug on a map ... well thats for HT to decide.

I'd bet dollars to donuts that the map glitch gets fixed asap (just like the Trinity P47 glitch) ... but not allowing one to switch sides and control a CV ... won't see the light of day.
SlapShot - Blue Knights

Guppy: "The only risk we take is the fight, and since no one really dies, the reward is the fight."