Author Topic: Remove the canopy frames (Read 3492 times)

Sandman · « **on:** August 21, 2005, 01:42:11 PM »

Can't we just get rid of the canopy frames or make 'em transparent?

The current canopies look good but it's like having one eye and a post for a neck.

hitech · « **Reply #1 on:** August 22, 2005, 09:10:12 AM »

Do you know you can move your head and save positionss?

Sandman · « **Reply #2 on:** August 22, 2005, 11:56:36 PM »

straffo · « **Reply #3 on:** August 23, 2005, 02:39:41 AM »

You mean something à la Xtreme racing with semi transparent canopy frames ?

see : http://www.gamerankings.com/screens3/22256/2.jpg

Seeker · « **Reply #4 on:** August 23, 2005, 03:48:43 AM »

That's why they made Track IR.

Sandman · « **Reply #5 on:** August 23, 2005, 01:09:25 PM »

Quote

Originally posted by straffo
You mean something à la Xtreme racing with semi transparent canopy frames ?

see : http://www.gamerankings.com/screens3/22256/2.jpg

EXACTLY!

Siaf__csf · « **Reply #6 on:** August 23, 2005, 01:46:19 PM »

Sandman wait untill 3D headmounted displays come down in price, then you can move your vision around them just like in a real plane.

Sandman · « **Reply #7 on:** August 23, 2005, 09:57:36 PM »

Quote

Originally posted by Siaf__csf
Sandman wait untill 3D headmounted displays come down in price, then you can move your vision around them just like in a real plane.

We can only wish for the day when an online flight sim supports VR goggles.

Siaf__csf · « **Reply #8 on:** August 24, 2005, 01:53:53 AM »

If trackir works, shouldnt vr work too? All it does is combine trackir to a software based 3D display on the headset. AH is already 3D so it should be just a combination of two existing technologies - trackir and 3D display glasses.

Right?

I think the only thing setting us back is still the price. Shutter glasses are cheaper but cause headaches.

SkyWolf · « **Reply #9 on:** August 24, 2005, 07:12:30 AM »

Quote

Originally posted by Sandman
EXACTLY!

Dude... that's lame.

jpeg · « **Reply #10 on:** August 24, 2005, 10:00:51 AM »

Quote

Originally posted by SkyWolf
Dude... that's lame.

I have to agree, it's way too "arcadey"

Sandman · « **Reply #11 on:** August 24, 2005, 10:21:24 AM »

Quote

Originally posted by SkyWolf
Dude... that's lame.

So is monocular vision.

Kweassa · « **Reply #12 on:** August 25, 2005, 02:06:55 PM »

Quote

So is monocular vision.

Then between the two lamey stuff, I choose what we have now.

Sandman · « **Reply #13 on:** August 25, 2005, 02:38:34 PM »

How about a compromise and make it something that can be enabled or not by the user?

Alpo · « **Reply #14 on:** August 25, 2005, 03:15:12 PM »

Cool... can I get a plane like Wonder Woman flew? (the one in the comics... not the SILLY jet one)