B-29 Super Fortress

[stealth]

o well B29 or not still be fun to fly in the game more people would play to

[Nemisis]

Random question: has anyone seen a marked improvment of this kids grammar  ?

[Drewster327]

I really do think we need B-29's, they are such a huge part of American History, not just because of the atomic bombs, but because they helped tremendously in the Pacific theater. I've toured FIFI the last B29 myself, and I really would love to fly it in the game.

[stroker71]

Ya, how can you people keep missing it?? I use it to blow up 3-4 large airfields in 1 run! 

Yeah I fly so high and fast no one can get an Icon on the B29.  You just need to fly around at 35k more offen I can't tell ya the perk price for them but it don't show up on the list till you have enough perks to fly it. So keep racking up those perks...you'll get there!

DuHasst

[Skulls22]

How fast can it go? (in the game)

[Nemisis]

Yeah I fly so high and fast no one can get an Icon on the B29.  You just need to fly around at 35k more offen I can't tell ya the perk price for them but it don't show up on the list till you have enough perks to fly it. So keep racking up those perks...you'll get there!

DuHasst

You have more problems with killing the 262, 163 and, to a lesser extent, the Ar234 than you would the B-29: fast, can't ususally catch one flying level.

There are fighters that can catch it, so that isn't the issue. The real problem is the the bombload and armament coulped WITH the speed. If all we were asking for was a faster lanc, I doubt there would be such a huge issue about it. But basicly what they want is a faster Ki67 carrying 20k of bombs.

[Spikes]

and, to a lesser extent, the Ar234

Wanna test that theory?

[Denholm]

*cough* He 111 *cough*

The following indigestion is supported by the committee for enhanced German arsenals.

[guncrasher]

The following indigestion is supported by the committee for enhanced German arsenals.

you mean the a26  .  sorry guys his choking deprived him of air for a few minutes and got confused  .

semp

[Denholm]

Certainly you are aware human brains and mouths have a very close and distinct connection? In fact, medical research has proven our thoughts to be directly linked to our actions... If he was even remotely thinking about the A-26, it would have been mentioned upon the surfacing side-effects of his indigestion. Since it was not, this can only mean one thing... He truly was thinking about how a squadron of He-111s are easily overwhelmed by a single A-26.

The previous message was not approved by the committee for enhanced German arsenals.

[Templar]

Since this is a blow off thread anyway..... +1 for the B-52!!!!!! Conventional armament only, no nukes.   

[1carbine]

Whats wrong with the B-29 why wouldn't you want it? NO NUKES !

[Duckdown]

  I also think if it was a plane or what ever in WWII it should be in here along with dams to blow up train bridges to hit and many other things to bring to life what men really had to do back then.
might care to stop the silly dar-bar as they call it and try better some how to keep hacks out and make it so all side are kept even and not supper scope on tanks and so many other hack and stuff i see each day!
But as Stealth has ask for and so do I and over two hundred others but just don't know how to ask for it the B-29 should be part of Our history in here of this game.
Thank you Duckdown the duck with teeth
P.S. would like to not just have out troops logo on our planes and tanks but also our own as long as the site team seems to find it is OK and not rude nor vine?

[gyrene81]

Whats wrong with the B-29 why wouldn't you want it? NO NUKES !

Why would anyone want another U.S. very late war bomber when there are so many other useful planes that could be added?

[oakranger]

Why would anyone want another U.S. very late war bomber when there are so many other useful planes that could be added?

How can it be a very late bomber when it was put into action in May 1944, 1 1/4 years early before Japs quit?