How About a Notch of High Speed Flaps For The 190's?

[SirLoin]

Stricty gameplay speaking...I'd like to see the FW's have a flap option at 200 mph.

Another notch at 160 and we'll take it from there.

[Nomak]

Originally posted by SirLoin
Stricty gameplay speaking...I'd like to see the FW's have a flap option at 200 mph.

Another notch at 160 and we'll take it from there.

LOL Mustang and 47N have em @ 400

[JB42]

See, were not even greedy about it

[SirLoin]

Imagine the attack potential for the FW a8/f ...

[Ack-Ack]

If HT will not get rid of the coddling Auto-retracting flaps in favor of a model that will model flap stress realistically, then I really don't think you'll have a snow ball's chance in Hell getting an extra flap setting a plane didn't have put into the game.



ack-ack

[1K3]

190s did have 1 notch high speed combat flaps and can be used below 300 mph. This's been showed on aircraft/vehicle thread.


Also it would be important to have AUTO EXTENDING FLAPs for N1K2-J. All N1K2-Js had this feature and a mercury thingy is used to sense if the Angle of attack is high. If angle of attack is high the the flaps automatically extend

[Krusty]

Originally posted by 1K3
Also it would be nice to have AUTO EXTENDING FLAPs for N1K2-J. All N1K2-Js had this feature and a mercury thingy is used to sense if the Angle of attack is high. If angle of attack is high the the flaps automatically extend

Have to disagree there. While they MAY have had some sort of mechanism in reality, I don't want the game flying my plane for me. I want to turn my flaps on when I want 'em, dagnabbit!!! I accept autoretract because it's the best solution for that problem, but I don't want autodeploy!! Too gamey.

[Wilbus]

1K3, do you have a link to that thread about 190 Flaps?

[Kweassa]

If HT will not get rid of the coddling Auto-retracting flaps in favor of a model that will model flap stress realistically, then I really don't think you'll have a snow ball's chance in Hell getting an extra flap setting a plane didn't have put into the game.

 Irrelvant issue.

 ... as usual.

[Scrap]

no

[Wilbus]

I found the thread my self

Yeah I'd like to see the combat/takeoff/first notch of flaps deploy acording to historical values. Crumpp seem to have found good documents of it.

I do not want it added if it is proven to be wrong. Want it realistic.

[Larry]

what thread is it wil?

[Larokkit]

why couldnt auto flaps be a choice like auto takeoff?

[Karnak]

Originally posted by Krusty
Have to disagree there. While they MAY have had some sort of mechanism in reality, I don't want the game flying my plane for me. I want to turn my flaps on when I want 'em, dagnabbit!!! I accept autoretract because it's the best solution for that problem, but I don't want autodeploy!! Too gamey.

Why is it "gamey" to model a system that all N1K2-J's had in reality and one that worked very well in reality?  There is no "MAY have had" about it.  They had it.  That is part of the N1K2-J's flight performance.  To not want it is to want a gamey modification.

Now, only N1Ks should have the auto-deployed flaps, so far as I know.  Certainly US aircraft did not have that mechanism.

[Donzo]

Originally posted by Krusty
Have to disagree there. While they MAY have had some sort of mechanism in reality, I don't want the game flying my plane for me. I want to turn my flaps on when I want 'em, dagnabbit!!! I accept autoretract because it's the best solution for that problem, but I don't want autodeploy!! Too gamey.

How is adding something into the game that actually happened in real life gamey?  That's like saying the ability to look left and right is gamey.